Skip to content

Evaluating the Relationship Between Environmental Risk Factors in Housing Types and Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City

Evaluating the Relationship Between Environmental Risk Factors in Housing Types and Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02898129
Enrollment
1500
Registered
2016-09-13
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2017-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Respiratory Diseases

Keywords

chronic respiratory diseases, housing, lung function test

Brief summary

The research question is Are the different types of house in Ho Chi Minh city equally contributing to chronic respiratory diseases?. According to this question, a cross-sectional and explorative study was set up to explore the differences in the environmental characteristics and prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases among common housing types in Ho Chi Minh city. Preliminary work was performed in 100 houses (20 houses per type, included tube houses, rental houses, rural houses, slum and apartment) from November 2013 to June 2015. It included measures by environmental devices, questionnaires and indoor activities diaries. This study will aim to collect information about the prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) inside those house types to understand more about role of house types in developing CRDs. The objective is: 1. to evaluate the relationships between the type of house and lung function of inhabitants in each housing type. 2. to evaluate the effects of environmental risk factors in each house type on prevalence of CRDs

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaire

Basic lung function test performed with a micro-spirometer, without broncho dilatator

Sponsors

Brugmann University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Everybody

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to answer the questionnaire or give informed consent * Have a contra-indication for lung function test (acute myocardial infarction less that 1 month ago, pain related to spirometry, dementia/confused)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FEV1/FVC5 minutesBasic lung function test, without broncho dilatation (micro-spirometer). All lung function related outcomes are performed during the same test. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second. FVC: Forced vital capacity.
FVC5 minutesBasic lung function test, without broncho dilatation (micro-spirometer). All lung function related outcomes are performed during the same test.FVC: Forced vital capacity.
VC5 minutesBasic lung function test, without broncho dilatation (micro-spirometer). All lung function related outcomes performed during the same test. VC: Vital capacity
FEF 25-75%5 minutesBasic lung function test, without broncho dilatation (micro-spirometer).All lung function related outcomes are performed during the same test. FEF: Forced expiratory flow
Socio-demographic statusaround 10 minutesSocio-demographic data, assessed by a home made questionnaire
Health statusaround 10 minutesHealth status (symptomatology) data, assessed by a home made questionnaire
Indoor air exposure timearound 10 minutesIndoor air exposure (time spent indoor within housing types, with associated air characteristics) data, assessed by a home made questionnaire

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026