Postoperative Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following orthopedic surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with a continuous peripheral nerve block, which involves the percutaneous insertion of a catheter adjacent to the peripheral nerve(s) supplying a surgical site. Local anesthetic is introduced via the catheter. However, there are major problems with continuous nerve blocks that have dramatically limited their use outside academic centers. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) or nerve modulation is an alternative method of pain control involving the insertion of an electrical lead through an introducing needle-obviating an open surgical incision for placement-followed by the introduction of electric current to produce analgesia. This modality has been used to treat chronic pain, but it has not been evaluated with a randomized, controlled study when applied to acute pain management (post-surgical analgesia). This temporary therapy has multiple theoretical benefits over existing analgesics, such as a lack of systemic side effects (e.g., nausea, respiratory depression), an absence of induced muscle weakness, and a reduced risk of adverse events (e.g. infection). The purpose of the proposed randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, feasibility study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS and, if so, to help power a subsequent definitive randomized, controlled trial.
Detailed description
Written, informed consent will be obtained using an IRB-approved ICF prior to any study procedures. Lead insertion may occur up to 2 weeks prior to surgery within the CTRI, or the morning of surgery in the regional anesthesia induction area (it just depends on subject and surgeon preference, as well as logistical issues such as the time of the surgery and availability of the investigators). Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer. Preoperative lead insertion (approximately 1-3 hours). A percutaneous, helically-coiled, insulated electrical lead will be inserted via an introducer needle at least 2 cm proximal or distal to the perineural catheter location along the target nerve using real-time ultrasound guidance: Surgical Procedure Location: Perineural Catheter Location, Electrical Lead Location Shoulder: Interscalene, Interscalene or supraclavicular or suprascapular At or distal to the elbow: Infraclavicular, Interscalene, supraclavicular or terminal nerve(s) Foot or ankle: Popliteal-sciatic \[adductor canal optional\], Subgluteal-sciatic \[femoral optional\] \<or vice vera\> Knee or distal thigh: Adductor canal \[popliteal-sciatic optional\], Femoral \[subgluteal-sciatic optional\] It will be optional for a conducting probe to be used prior to lead insertion-this allows identification of the optimal lead tip location relative to the target nerve by passing electrical current via the insulated probe. The desired end point is a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve reported by the subject. If used, the probe will be completely withdrawn following target location identification, and a lead subsequently inserted to the target location. Following needle removal, the percutaneous helical lead will have electric current passed using the SPRINT (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, OH) pulse generator to ensure accurate placement (a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve). It will be replaced, if necessary. Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer during the delivery of electrical current. The pulse generator will then be removed and the lead affixed to the skin using an occlusive dressing. With the subject's permission the investigators may photograph or videotape the procedures described above for educational, training, or publication purposes. The photos or video will focus only on the lead insertion site and affected limb. Ultrasound images from the procedure may also be collected. Every effort will be made to protect the subject's privacy and the photos or video will not include the subject's face or any other personal identifiers such as birthmarks. Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Following successful lead insertion, a perineural catheter may be inserted, if the patient desires a catheter (with normal saline injection and not local anesthetic via the inserting needle). This will be used to deliver perineural local anesthetic as a rescue analgesic method postoperatively in case the SPRINT system provides inadequate analgesia. Randomization. Within the recovery room, the surgeon often performs a standard neurologic examination (variable depending on the surgeon and surgical procedure), after which time the subject will have baseline end points measured, including a pain score at the surgical site using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), pain score (NRS) within the target nerve distribution, and sensory deficits (measured with alcohol pads and von Frey filaments compared to the contralateral limb within the cutaneous distribution of the target nerve). For their first pulse generator-Stimulator A-subjects will be randomized to one of two treatments-current or sham-using computer generated lists and opaque, sealed envelopes. The stimulator will then be attached to the lead and switched on (sham stimulator produces no current). The end points will be measured per the table below. Subsequently, the stimulator will be replaced by the alternative (current or sham)-Stimulator B. The subject will have the end points measured and the stimulator replaced with a unit set to deliver active current for the remainder of study participation (Stimulator C). Operating and recovery room pharmacologic analgesic requirements will be recorded. Of note, if a lead fails to provide paresthesias within the target nerve distribution with either Stimulator A or B (adjustment of stimulator settings allowed), the lead may be replaced at the discretion of the subject and investigators. End point collection (first day within the recovery room; approximately 30 minutes): Baseline, then stimulator A is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator B is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator C is activated (always real) Minute 5 and 30 within the recovery room Daily x 14 days Months 1 and 3 Endpoints will include the numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) at the surgical site at rest and with movement, the lead-related NRS (pain at lead site), muscle strength, sensory deficits, and the question adequate analgesia? as a nominal response of yes or no. Of note, the data derived from the chronic pain literature suggests that there is a carry over effect following stimulation: analgesia is provided even after the cessation of electrical current. It remains unknown if this is true following surgery in the acute postoperative pain period. For subjects randomized to active current from Stimulator A, the data collected for Stimulator B placebo treatment may be lowered due to the carry over effect. Therefore, this data will not be compared with the baseline or Stimulator A outcome measures. However, it is valuable data to possibly detect and quantify the carry-over effect of the initial stimulation. At any time, subjects may choose to have their perineural catheter bolused with local anesthetic and a perineural local anesthetic infusion begun (if they desired a catheter with subsequent insertion). Therefore, subjects will not risk receiving inferior analgesia by participating in this study. However, subjects also have the option of leaving their infusion pump off and using neuromodulation as their primary analgesic if the latter proves adequate-the decision is completely each subject's and may be made any time prior to perineural catheter removal. Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Pain scores (resting and dynamic worst and average) will be collected daily for two weeks, along with oral analgesic requirements, perineural local anesthetic use, and sensory/motor deficits (all specific to the previous 24 hours). Perineural catheters will be removed at home upon subject request, after 3 days, or upon local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, whichever comes first (standard-of-care). The electrical leads will be removed upon subject request, or after 30 days, whichever comes first. The leads will be removed at home by subjects or their caretakers (standard-of-care for perineural catheter withdrawal) or by investigators, depending on both investigator and subject preference. If removed by subjects or their caretakers, a picture of the extracted lead tip must be texted/emailed to investigators, or the physical lead returned to investigators for inspection. Subjects will be contacted no less than every 5 days following the initial 2-week period until their lead is removed; and, will then be contacted 1 and 3 months postoperatively and the end points again verbally collected.
Interventions
Active electrical stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room
Sham (placebo) stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Treatment group assignments were unmasked after the leads were removed 2 weeks after surgery.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Undergoing orthopedic surgical procedure that frequently results in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain * At least 18 years of age * Able to understand and willing to take part in study and adhere to all study requirements
Exclusion criteria
* Postoperative analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block in the surgical extremity * Chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use \> 4 weeks) * Known neuro-muscular deficit of the target nerve(s) * Anticipated MRI within the following 2 weeks * Compromised immune system based on medical history (e.g., immunosuppressive therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, sepsis, infection), or other conditions that places the subject at increased risk in the opinion of the investigator * Implanted spinal cord stimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, or other implantable neurostimulator whose stimulus current pathway may overlap * History of bleeding disorder * Antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapies other than aspirin * Allergy to all local anesthetic agents such as lidocaine or previous reaction to anesthesia * Allergy to skin-contact materials (occlusive dressings, bandages, tape etc.) * Any other condition that may interfere with ability to participate in a clinical trial (e.g., anatomy that may interfere with lead placement) as determined by the Investigators * Incarceration * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] | 5 and 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated | Pain is evaluated on a Numeric Rating Scale: 0-10 scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the pain score 5 and then 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated on the Numeric Rating Scale divided by the baseline pain score measured on the same scale. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Worst Pain at Rest | Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days | Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here). |
| Average Pain at Rest | Daily for days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days | Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here). |
| Percentage of Baseline Muscle Strength | Two minutes following stimulation initiation following lead insertion | Strength is evaluated using an isometric force electromechanical dynamometer to measure the force produced during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction during plantar flexion. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the force produced after the stimulator is activated divided by the baseline force prior to stimulation initiation. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design. |
| Average Pain During Movement | Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, and then at 30 and 90 days | Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here). |
| Opioid Consumption | Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, and then at 30 and 90 days | Oxycodone consumption (oxycodone is a synthetic opioid). Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here). |
| Worst Pain During Movement | Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days | Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
This was a feasibility study and we prospectively chose a convenience sample. We decided that we had enough data from this phase after enrolling 7 subjects for the sciatic leads and therefore closed enrollment and the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Then Sham Then Active electrical current will be introduced to the insulated percutaneous lead(s) for 5 minutes, then sham for 5 minutes, then active current for 2-4 weeks | 4 |
| Sham Then Active Electrical Current sham will be given for 5 minutes followed by active current for 2-4 weeks | 3 |
| Total | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Active Then Sham Then Active | Sham Then Active Electrical Current | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 | 48.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8 | 55 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 |
| Body Mass Index | 25.0 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 | 30.4 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 | 27.3 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 |
| Height | 163.8 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 | 175.3 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8 | 168.7 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | โ | โ | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 4 participants | 3 participants | 7 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain]
Pain is evaluated on a Numeric Rating Scale: 0-10 scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the pain score 5 and then 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated on the Numeric Rating Scale divided by the baseline pain score measured on the same scale. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design.
Time frame: 5 and 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] | 5 Minutes after baseline just before 1st intervention | 64 percentage of baseline |
| Electrical Current | Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] | 10 minutes after baseline (which was just before 1st intervention) | 55 percentage of baseline |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] | 10 minutes after baseline (which was just before 1st intervention) | 69 percentage of baseline |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] | 5 Minutes after baseline just before 1st intervention | 100 percentage of baseline |
Average Pain at Rest
Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here).
Time frame: Daily for days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 1 following intervention | 0.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 2 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 3 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 4 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 5 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 6 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 7 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 8 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 9 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 10 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 11 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 12 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 13 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 14 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain at Rest | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 1 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 9 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 2 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 13 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 3 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 10 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 4 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 5 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 11 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 6 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 14 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 7 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 12 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain at Rest | Day 8 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
Average Pain During Movement
Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here).
Time frame: Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, and then at 30 and 90 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 1 following intervention | 1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 2 following intervention | 2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 3 following intervention | 2.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 4 following intervention | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 5 following intervention | 1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 6 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 7 following intervention | 1.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 8 following intervention | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 9 following intervention | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 10 following intervention | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 11 following intervention | 1.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 12 following intervention | 2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 13 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 14 following intervention | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Average Pain During Movement | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 1 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 9 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 2 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 13 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 3 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 10 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 4 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 5 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 11 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 6 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 14 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 7 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 12 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Average Pain During Movement | Day 8 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
Opioid Consumption
Oxycodone consumption (oxycodone is a synthetic opioid). Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here).
Time frame: Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, and then at 30 and 90 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 1 following intervention | 3.3 mg | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 2 following intervention | 10 mg | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 3 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 4 following intervention | 1.7 mg | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 5 following intervention | 6.7 mg | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 6 following intervention | 5 mg | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 7 following intervention | 15 mg | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 8 following intervention | 15 mg | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 9 following intervention | 8.3 mg | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 10 following intervention | 6.7 mg | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 11 following intervention | 8.3 mg | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 12 following intervention | 10 mg | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 13 following intervention | 8.3 mg | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 14 following intervention | 8.3 mg | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 30 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Opioid Consumption | Day 90 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 90 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 1 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 9 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 2 following intervention | 18.3 mg | Standard Deviation 27.5 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 13 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 3 following intervention | 13.3 mg | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 10 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 4 following intervention | 5.0 mg | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 30 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 5 following intervention | 3.3 mg | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 11 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 6 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 14 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 7 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 12 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Opioid Consumption | Day 8 following intervention | 0 mg | Standard Deviation 0 |
Percentage of Baseline Muscle Strength
Strength is evaluated using an isometric force electromechanical dynamometer to measure the force produced during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction during plantar flexion. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the force produced after the stimulator is activated divided by the baseline force prior to stimulation initiation. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design.
Time frame: Two minutes following stimulation initiation following lead insertion
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Percentage of Baseline Muscle Strength | 1.0 percentage of baseline muscle strength | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Placebo | Percentage of Baseline Muscle Strength | -2.3 percentage of baseline muscle strength | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
Worst Pain at Rest
Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here).
Time frame: Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 1 following intervention | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 2 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 3 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 4 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 5 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 6 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 7 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 8 following intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 9 following intervention | 2.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 10 following intervention | 2.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 11 following intervention | 3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 12 following intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 13 following intervention | 2.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 14 following intervention | 2.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 1 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 9 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 2 following intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 13 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 3 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 10 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 4 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 5 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 11 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 6 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 14 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 7 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 12 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain at Rest | Day 8 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
Worst Pain During Movement
Pain level evaluated with a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Both treatment groups are receiving active stimulation from 10 minutes following baseline until the leads are removed 2-4 weeks following baseline. However, we do not know if the order of the first 10 minutes of treatment (either sham then stimulation or stimulation then sham) affects subsequent effects. Therefore, these two treatment groups must remain separate for the remainder of the study period (even though both treatment groups are receiving the same intervention on each of the days described here).
Time frame: Daily for Days 1-14 following surgery, then at 30 and 90 days
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 1 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 2 following intervention | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 3 following intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 4 following intervention | 2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 5 following intervention | 2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 6 following intervention | 2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 7 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 8 following intervention | 3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 9 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 10 following intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 11 following intervention | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 12 following intervention | 3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 13 following intervention | 3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 14 following intervention | 3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Electrical Current | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 90 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 1 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 9 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 2 following intervention | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 13 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 3 following intervention | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 10 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 4 following intervention | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 30 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 5 following intervention | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 11 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 6 following intervention | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 14 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 7 following intervention | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 12 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Worst Pain During Movement | Day 8 following intervention | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |