Seizures
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to prove that intramuscular midazolam is more effective than buccal midazolam in cessation of seizure activity with comparable side effects.
Detailed description
Both buccal and intramuscular midazolam have been used to control seizures with variable succuss rates and side effects. In this study the investigators are going to assign patient randomly to receive either buccal or intramuscular midazolam. Then will compare both efficacy and side effect in both groups.
Interventions
Study subject will receive Buccal midazolam, Intramuscular placebo.
Study subject will receive Intramuscular midazolam,Buccal placebo
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Children 6 month to 14 years who will be presented to the pediatric emergency or attended by emergency medical service who have active seizure and had no intravenous access would be eligible for the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Cardiac arrest * Head trauma * Drowning * Congenital heart disease * Inborn errors of metabolism * Electrolyte imbalance (hypocalcaemia, hyponatremia and hypoglycemia) * Hemodynamic instability * Allergy to benzodiazepines * Focal seizures with preserved level of consciousness
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cessation of seizure activity five minutes after treatment with study medication. | five minutes | Cessation of abnormal motor activity with regaining of consciousness. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Major side effects. | 2 hours after cessation of seizures. |
| Duration of seizure. | 5 minutes |
| Recurrence of seizure activity within one hour after treatment with study medication. | one hour |
Countries
Qatar