Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided Caudal or Interlaminar Corticosteroid Epidural Injection for Sciatica

Ultrasound-guided Caudal or Interlaminar Injection? A Comparative Study of Epidural Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Disk Herniation-related Sciatica

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02897336
Acronym
HiatUS
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-09-13
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatica

Brief summary

An open-label randomized trial to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided caudal and interlaminar corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation-related sciatica.

Detailed description

An open-label randomized trial conducted in one centre to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided caudal and interlaminar corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation-related sciatica. 30 male and female patients will be included in each group. The primary outcome measure will be a 30% decrease in lower limbs pain as assessed by a visual analog scale.

Interventions

ultrasound-guided caudal epidural corticosteroid injection

PROCEDUREinterlaminar

interlaminar epidural corticosteroid injection

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* radicular pain (sciatica or cruralgia) for more than 2 weeks * failure of analgesics and NSAIDs * without neurological deficiency (motor weakness lower or equal to 3/5) * a lumbar disk herniation on MRI or CT dating less than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* history of lumbar surgery * history of epidural injection during the last 3 months * radicular pain not due to disk herniation * a contraindication to epidural injection (infection, diabetes) * history of allergic reaction to corticosteroid * patient under legal guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
lower limbs painday 15a 30% decrease in lower limbs pain using a visual analog scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A decrease of radicular pain with a pain numerical scale lower or equal to 3/10day 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6pain numerical scale lower or equal to 3/10
neurological deficiency assessed by neurological examinationday 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6motor weakness or sensitive deficiency in lower limbs
drugsday 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6decrease in analgesic treatment
Oswestry questionnaireday 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6low back pain disability assessment using Oswestry questionnaire
resumption of workday 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6deadline of resumption of work
number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0day 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6adverse events assessed by CTCAE v4.0
medical outcomeday 15 - month 1 - month 3 - month 6Medical Outcome study Short Form (SF-36)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026