Skip to content

A Study Treating Participants With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment

STRIKE - Treating Patients With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis to Target - a 1 Year Randomized Controlled Study Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02897115
Acronym
STRIKE
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-09-13
Start date
2016-09-12
Completion date
2017-12-21
Last updated
2019-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Keywords

Axial Spondyloarthritis, Humira

Brief summary

A study comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) intense treatment approach with routine treatment (Standard of Care \[SOC\]) in reducing disease activity in participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Administered every other week by subcutaneous injection for up to 48 weeks, depending on participants' disease activity.

ASAS recommended NSAID doses to treat axial spondyloarthritis.

Sponsors

IST GmbH, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hannover Medical School
CollaboratorOTHER
Improvement by Movement GmbH, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed written informed consent before start of study-related assessments or procedures * Diagnosis of axSpA (either ankylosing spondylitis or non-radiographic axSpA) and fulfilling the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA * Participants aged ≥ 18 years * Disease duration \< 5 years * Participants must have a Baseline disease activity as defined by an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 or a Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4 * NSAID-naive or not treated with the maximal recommended NSAID dose during the last 2 weeks prior to the Baseline visit * Participants must never have failed a NSAID taken at maximal recommended dose for 2 weeks or more.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for NSAIDs or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker according to local labeling * If entering the study on concomitant NSAIDs, participants taking the maximal recommended dose during the last 2 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit or have failed or developed intolerance to a NSAID taken at maximal recommended dose for 2 weeks or more at any time * Prior exposure to any anti-TNF therapy; any biologic therapy with a potential therapeutic impact on SpA, or participant has been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to the Baseline visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 32Week 32ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein \[CRP\] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS \< 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): PresenteeismBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): AbsenteeismBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity ImpairmentBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline, week 32, and week 52Erythrocyte sedimentation rate measures the rate of fall (sedimentation) of erythrocytes (red blood cells) in a sample of blood that has been placed into a tall, thin, vertical tube as an indirect measure of the degree of inflammation present in the body.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity ImpairmentBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)Baseline, week 32, and week 52The ASAS HI measures functioning and health across 17 aspects of health in patients with AS, including pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self care, and community life. The ASAS HI consists of 17 questions, each answered by the participant as agree (1) or disagree (0). The responses to the 17 dichotomous items are summed up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 17, with a lower score indicating a better and a higher score indicating an inferior health status.
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity IndexBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 ResponseBaseline, week 32, and week 52The BASDAI assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate less disease activity. A BASDAI 50 response is defined as improvement of 50% or more from baseline in BASDAI score.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Baseline, week 32, and week 52The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a validated index to determine the degree of functional limitation in patients with AS. BASFI consists of 10 questions assessing participants' ability to perform activities, on a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (easy to perform an activity) to 10 (impossible to perform an activity). The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)Baseline, week 32, and week 52ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. Change from baseline in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major ImprovementBaseline, week 32, and week 52ASDAS Major Improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -2.0. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with major improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important ImprovementBaseline, week 32, and week 52ASDAS clinically important improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -1.1. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with clinically important improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52Week 52ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS \< 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, week 32, and week 52CRP is an acute phase reactant is a blood test marker for inflammation in the body. CRP levels rise in response to inflammation.
Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior UveitisUp to Week 52Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireBaseline, week 32, and week 52The EQ-5D-3L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status (utility). The 5 items in the EQ-5D-3L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 3 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating some/moderate problems, 3: indicating extreme problems). A single preference-weighted health utility index score was calculated by applying country-specific weights, with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health).
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease ActivityWeek 32 and week 52ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS moderate disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease ActivityWeek 32 and week 52ASDAS high disease activity is defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to \< 3.5. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to \< 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported.
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease ActivityWeek 32 and week 52ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with very high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS \> 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 ResponseBaseline, week 32, and week 52ASAS20 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 20% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 1 unit (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 1 unit) in the potential remaining domain: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 ResponseBaseline, week 32, and week 52ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 40% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration in the potential remaining domain: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)Baseline, week 32, and week 52The linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin) is a composite score based on 5 direct measurements of spinal mobility: lateral lumbar flexion, tragus-to-wall distance, lumbar flexion, intermalleolar distance, and cervical rotation angle. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more limited mobility.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 32 and week 52ASAS partial remission is defined as an absolute score of ≤ 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale for each of the four following domains: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Change From Baseline in Active Inflammation of the Sacroiliac Joints and SpineBaseline and week 52Active inflammation of the sacroiliac (SI) joints as well as the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Images were scored by a central reader according to the Berlin MRI Score on a grading scale from 0 to 3, where Grade 0 indicates no active inflammation and Grade 3 indicates \> 66% inflammation of the sacroiliac joints or \> 50% active inflammation in the spine.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (severe disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (very severe disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of PainBaseline, week 32, and week 52The Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed on a NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as it could be).
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint CountBaseline, week 32, and week 52An assessment of 66 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The swollen joint count is the number of joints assessed as swollen (0 to 66).
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint CountBaseline, week 32, and week 52An assessment of 68 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The tender joint count is the number of joints assessed as tender (0 to 68).
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)Baseline, week 32, and week 52The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at 13 entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone). All sites were scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (from 0 to 13).
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis CountBaseline, week 32, and week 52Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as 0 for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis count, ranging from 0 to 20, is the total number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 32 and week 52ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS low disease activity (defined as ASDAS \< 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study planned to enroll approximately 240 participants at 30 sites in Germany. Due to slow enrollment the study was terminated prematurely; at the time the decision to close the study was made 22 subjects were enrolled at 9 sites in Germany.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treat-to-Target (T2T)
Participants initially received treatment with any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, if the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was ≥ 2.1 or treatment with NSAID 1 was not tolerated, treatment was changed to a second NSAID at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. If ASDAS was ≥ 2.1 after 4 weeks of NSAID 2, participants were switched to receive a combination of NSAID and adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 48 weeks.
14
Standard of Care (SOC)
Participants received treatment as prescribed by their physician according to the local standard of care.
8
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyEarly termination of study by sponsor118

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreat-to-Target (T2T)Standard of Care (SOC)Total
Age, Continuous37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 812 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 81 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 32

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein \[CRP\] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS \< 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Week 32

Population: Participants with available data at week 32

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 3280.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Active Inflammation of the Sacroiliac Joints and Spine

Active inflammation of the sacroiliac (SI) joints as well as the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Images were scored by a central reader according to the Berlin MRI Score on a grading scale from 0 to 3, where Grade 0 indicates no active inflammation and Grade 3 indicates \> 66% inflammation of the sacroiliac joints or \> 50% active inflammation in the spine.

Time frame: Baseline and week 52

Population: The study terminated early due to slow enrollment and no data were collected.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. Change from baseline in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)Week 32-1.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.833
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)Week 52-0.654 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)

The ASAS HI measures functioning and health across 17 aspects of health in patients with AS, including pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self care, and community life. The ASAS HI consists of 17 questions, each answered by the participant as agree (1) or disagree (0). The responses to the 17 dichotomous items are summed up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 17, with a lower score indicating a better and a higher score indicating an inferior health status.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)Week 32-4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)Week 52-3.00 score on a scale
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)Week 323.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a validated index to determine the degree of functional limitation in patients with AS. BASFI consists of 10 questions assessing participants' ability to perform activities, on a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (easy to perform an activity) to 10 (impossible to perform an activity). The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 52-1.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.849
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 32-2.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)Week 32-1.50 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP is an acute phase reactant is a blood test marker for inflammation in the body. CRP levels rise in response to inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Week 32-4.47 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.38
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Week 52-3.47 mg/LStandard Deviation 6
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Week 32-1.00 mg/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Count

Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as 0 for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis count, ranging from 0 to 20, is the total number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Dactylitis CountWeek 520.0000 digits with dactylitisStandard Deviation 0
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Dactylitis CountWeek 320.0000 digits with dactylitisStandard Deviation 0
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Dactylitis CountWeek 320.0000 digits with dactylitis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire

The EQ-5D-3L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status (utility). The 5 items in the EQ-5D-3L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 3 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating some/moderate problems, 3: indicating extreme problems). A single preference-weighted health utility index score was calculated by applying country-specific weights, with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireWeek 320.446 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.181
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireWeek 520.255 units on a scale
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireWeek 32-0.287 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)

The linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin) is a composite score based on 5 direct measurements of spinal mobility: lateral lumbar flexion, tragus-to-wall distance, lumbar flexion, intermalleolar distance, and cervical rotation angle. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more limited mobility.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)Week 32-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.632
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)Week 52-1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.944
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)Week 32-1.10 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)

The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at 13 entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone). All sites were scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (from 0 to 13).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)Week 520.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)Week 32-0.800 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)Week 320.0000 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (very severe disease activity).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 32-2.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 52-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.61
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 324.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain

The Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed on a NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as it could be).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of PainWeek 32-1.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.28
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of PainWeek 52-0.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of PainWeek 323.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (severe disease activity).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 32-4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 52-2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 321.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count

An assessment of 66 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The swollen joint count is the number of joints assessed as swollen (0 to 66).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint CountWeek 320.0000 swollen jointsStandard Deviation 0
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint CountWeek 520.333 swollen jointsStandard Deviation 0.577
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint CountWeek 320.0000 swollen joints
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count

An assessment of 68 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The tender joint count is the number of joints assessed as tender (0 to 68).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Tender Joint CountWeek 32-3.40 tender jointsStandard Deviation 5.98
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Tender Joint CountWeek 52-6.33 tender jointsStandard Deviation 6.66
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Tender Joint CountWeek 321.00 tender joints
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity IndexWeek 52-1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity IndexWeek 32-3.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity IndexWeek 323.20 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate measures the rate of fall (sedimentation) of erythrocytes (red blood cells) in a sample of blood that has been placed into a tall, thin, vertical tube as an indirect measure of the degree of inflammation present in the body.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 32-2.60 mm/hourStandard Deviation 3.05
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 52-4.00 mm/hourStandard Deviation 3.46
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 320.0000 mm/hour
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Absenteeism

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants who were employed and with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): AbsenteeismWeek 52-100.0 percent impairment
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): AbsenteeismWeek 32-100.0 percent impairment
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): AbsenteeismWeek 3225.0 percent impairment
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Presenteeism

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants who were employed and with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): PresenteeismWeek 32-23.3 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 55.1
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): PresenteeismWeek 3220.0 percent impairment
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity Impairment

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity ImpairmentWeek 32-36.0 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 15.2
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity ImpairmentWeek 52-30.0 percent impairment
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity ImpairmentWeek 3230.0 percent impairment
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity Impairment

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants who were employed and with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity ImpairmentWeek 32-90.0 percent impairment
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity ImpairmentWeek 52-80.0 percent impairment
Standard of Care (SOC)Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity ImpairmentWeek 3227.5 percent impairment
Secondary

Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior Uveitis

Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior Uveitis0 Participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior Uveitis0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 Response

The BASDAI assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate less disease activity. A BASDAI 50 response is defined as improvement of 50% or more from baseline in BASDAI score.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 ResponseWeek 5233.3 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 ResponseWeek 3260.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 ResponseWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 Response

ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 40% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration in the potential remaining domain: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 ResponseWeek 3220.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 ResponseWeek 5250.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 ResponseWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response

ASAS20 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 20% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 1 unit (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 1 unit) in the potential remaining domain: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 ResponseWeek 3240.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 ResponseWeek 5250.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 ResponseWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial Remission

ASAS partial remission is defined as an absolute score of ≤ 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale for each of the four following domains: * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe); * Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe); * Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible); * Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).

Time frame: Week 32 and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 5250.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important Improvement

ASDAS clinically important improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -1.1. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with clinically important improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important ImprovementWeek 3260.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important ImprovementWeek 5233.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major Improvement

ASDAS Major Improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -2.0. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with major improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at baseline and each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major ImprovementWeek 3220.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major ImprovementWeek 5233.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease Activity

ASDAS high disease activity is defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to \< 3.5. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to \< 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Week 32 and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease ActivityWeek 3220.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease ActivityWeek 5233.3 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease ActivityWeek 32100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS \< 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Participants with available data at week 52

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 5233.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS low disease activity (defined as ASDAS \< 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Week 32 and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 3280.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 5266.7 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease ActivityWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease Activity

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with ASDAS moderate disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.

Time frame: Week 32 and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease ActivityWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease ActivityWeek 5233.3 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease ActivityWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease Activity

ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: \< 1.3 for inactive disease; ≥ 1.3 to \< 2.1 for moderate disease activity; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for high disease activity and \> 3.5 for very high disease activity. The percentage of participants with very high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS \> 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported

Time frame: Week 32 and week 52

Population: Participants with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease ActivityWeek 520.0 percentage of participants
Treat-to-Target (T2T)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease ActivityWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease ActivityWeek 320.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026