Skip to content

Canadian Humira Post Marketing Observational Epidemiological Study : Assessing Humira Real-life Effectiveness and Impact on HS Burden of Illness

Canadian Humira Post Marketing Observational Epidemiological Study : Assessing Humira Real-life Effectiveness and Impact on Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Burden of Illness and Health Care Resources Utilization

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02896920
Acronym
SOLACE
Enrollment
165
Registered
2016-09-12
Start date
2016-09-20
Completion date
2019-04-29
Last updated
2020-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

Keywords

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS), Humira®, Canada

Brief summary

This study assesses Humira's® real-life effectiveness in the management of dermatological manifestations of moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has a clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe HS according to the treating physician judgment * Need a change in ongoing therapy for any reason, but not limited to inadequate response, intolerance, sub-optimal compliance, or patient preference. Patient will be approached to participate in the study after a decision to change patient's therapy for Humira® is made by the treating physician. * Has provided written informed consent (Patient Authorization) for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Is participating in a clinical interventional study * Was treated with Humira®, or any other biologic agents for HS prior to baseline visit * Has any other active skin disease or condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, prohibits the patient from participating in the study or obscures the assessment of the treatment of HS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants achieving clinical response using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure (HiSCR) at week 24At Week 24The HiSCR measure is defined as at least a 50% reduction in the Abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The HADS questionnaire includes 14 questions that evaluate the level of anxiety and depression an HS patient may experience associated with HS. A lower score indicates less severity.
Change from Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The IIEF contains 15 questions that were assigned in 5 domains of male sexuality: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction.
Change from Baseline in Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) associated with HSFrom Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52This will be assessed using a descriptive questionnaire that aimed at measuring the patient's health care resource utilization and economic impact of HS.
Change from Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of HS (HS-PtGA)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The HSPtGA consists in one question that evaluates how one patient ranked the severity of HS at the time of the routine visit.
Proportion of participants achieving clinical response using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure (HiSCR) at week 52At Week 52The HiSCR measure is defined as at least a 50% reduction in the Abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Change from Baseline in Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52This is a comprehensive system for measuring health status and health-related quality of life and for producing utility scores.
Proportion of participants who experience flareUp to Week 52It is defined as at least 25% increase in AN counts with a minimum increase of 2 relative to baseline
Proportion of participants who experience worsening of HS by >= 1 Hurley Stage in >= 1 affected anatomic regionUp to Week 52This will be done by evaluating the Hurley Stage using the following description: Stage I: Abscess formation, single or multiple, without sinus tracts and cicatrization (scarring). Stage II: One or more widely separated recurrent abscesses with tract formation and cicatrization (scars). Stage III: Multiple interconnected tracts and abscesses across the entire area, with diffuse or near diffuse involvement.
Change from Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Assessment (HSSA)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The HSSA questionnaire includes 9 questions that evaluate the symptoms an HS participant may experience associated with HS.
Change from Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Impact Assessment (HSIA)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The HSIA questionnaire includes 18 questions that evaluate the impacts an HS participant may experience associated with HS.
Change from Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem V2.0 (WPAI: SHP)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The WPAI: SHP evaluates four areas: percent work time missed due to HS, percent impairment while working due to HS, percent overall work impairment due to HS, and percent activity impairment due to HS.
Number of days where participants experience HS flare-upUp to Week 52It is calculated from the day when flare is observed to the day prior to the observation that flare is no longer present. Of note, there could be multiple periods that flares are observed, in which case, the total days from the multiple periods will be used.
Change from Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)From Week 0 (baseline) to Week 52The FSFI questionnaire contains 19 questions that describe the female sexual function in 6 domains. The domains are: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain, which can both be evaluated individually and in their entirety.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026