Skip to content

Tolerability of Using a Post-Treatment Topical Adjuvant Combination Following Fractional Radiofrequency Ablation

Clinical Evaluation of the Tolerability of Using a Post Treatment Topical Adjuvant Combination Following Fractional Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Venus Viva

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02896569
Enrollment
49
Registered
2016-09-12
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2017-02-27
Last updated
2020-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Disorders

Keywords

resurfacing, ablation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of the application of a combination of a serum containing human bone marrow stem cell derived growth factor (SCR Complex) and cytokines and a botanical lipid-based occlusive (Bio Cel) immediately following fractional radiofrequency treatment using the Venus Viva versus standard of care.

Detailed description

Randomized, open-label, multi-centre study to evaluate the tolerability of the application of a combination of a serum containing human bone marrow stem cell derived growth factor and cytokines (SCR Complex™) and a botanical lipid based occlusive (Bio Cel™) following facial fractional RF treatments using the Venus Viva™ SR system. Each subject will receive 2 treatments separated by a 3-week interval. Subjects will complete a VAS and Tolerability Scale immediately following each treatment. Telephone follow-up calls by the site will ask the subject to respond to the Self-Report Adverse Event Questionnaire 24 and 72 hours after the first treatment and 24 hours after the second treatment. Subjects will complete a Home Tolerability Scale 24 and 72 hours after the first treatment and 24 hours after the second treatment. Subjects will return for the final FU visit and be asked to respond to the Self-Report Adverse Event Questionnaire and complete the Home Tolerability Scale for 72 hours. The investigator will also evaluate the subject's improvement using the GAIS at this visit.

Interventions

OTHERTopical combination therapy

Sponsors

Venus Concept
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing a dermatological procedure requiring ablation and resurfacing of the facial skin utilizing the Venus Viva™ SR system. * Women of child-bearing age are required to be using a reliable method of birth control prior to enrollment and throughout their participation in the study. * Able to tolerate the treatment as determined by a test spot application(s).

Exclusion criteria

* Superficial metal or other implants in the treatment area * Tattoos, permanent makeup, scars or piercings in the treatment area. * Any active condition in the treatment area, such as sores, psoriasis, eczema and rash. * Any surgical procedure in the treatment area within the last three months or before complete healing. * Receiving therapies or medication that may interfere with the study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post Treatment24hr post treatment oneTolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post Treatment72 hrs post treatment oneTolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post Treatment24hr post treatment twoTolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post Treatment72hr post treatment twoTolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scalechange in appearance of wrinkles from baseline and at end of study, average of 24 daysInvestigator assessment of improvement in wrinkles and elastosis where Class I indicates fine wrinkles, Class II indicates fine to moderate depth wrinkles with a moderate number of lines and Class III indicates fine to deep wrinkles, numerous lines with or without redundant skin folds with a score of 1 - 3 (Mild) indicates fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines, a score of 4 - 6 (Moderate) indicates distinct papular elastosis (\[indvidual papules with yellow translucency under direct lighting\] and dyschromia and a score of 7 - 9 (Severe) indicates multipapular and confluent elastosis \[thickened yellow and pallid\] approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis. A lower class and a lower score means a better outcome. Subjects were divided into 3 categories - No change in FWES score, change in FWES score by one and non-evaluable.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scalechange in skin appearance between baseline and at end of study, average of 24 daysInvestigator assessment of aesthetic improvement where 1 shows exceptional improvement, 2 shows very improved, 3 shows improvement, 4 shows unchanged and 5 indicates that the subject appearance has worsened. A low score means a better outome. Subjects were categorized to either GAIS improved or GAIS no change.
Visual Analog Scaleimmediately following radio-frequency treatment10 cm Subject discomfort scale where 10 cm indicates 'Pain as bad as it can be' and 0 cm indicates there is no pain at all associated with the application of the treatment. Zero pain means a better outcome. Subjects were categorized as to having no pain (0 - 0.4cm), mild pain (0.5 - 4.4cm), moderate pain (4.5 - 7.4cm) and severe pain (7.5 - 10cm).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Topical Combination Therapy
Application of human bone marrow stem cell derived growth factor and cytokines serum followed by a botanical lipid-based occlusive immediately post-radio-frequency treatment of the face Topical combination therapy
25
Standard of Care
No topical therapies for 24 hours post-radio-frequency treatment of the face
24
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTopical Combination TherapyStandard of CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants24 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Tolerability of Initial Treatment
Initial Treatment - Having no opinion
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Tolerability of Initial Treatment
Initial treatment - Intolerable
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Tolerability of Initial Treatment
Initial Treatment - Tolerable
11 Participants16 Participants27 Participants
Tolerability of Initial Treatment
Initial treatment - Very intolerable
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Tolerability of Initial Treatment
Initial treatment - Very Tolerable
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post Treatment

Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.

Time frame: 24hr post treatment one

Population: Not all subjects only responded to telephone request for tolerability at 24 hours

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Tolerable7 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Very Tolerable15 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Very Tolerable18 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Tolerable3 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 24 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Primary

Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post Treatment

Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.

Time frame: 72 hrs post treatment one

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr - Tolerable3 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr - Very Tolerable17 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr - Very Tolerable17 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr - Tolerable0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post TreatmentTx 1 at 72 hr InTolerable1 Participants
Primary

Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post Treatment

Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.

Time frame: 24hr post treatment two

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr - Tolerable3 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr - Very Tolerable18 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr - Very Tolerable14 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr - Tolerable4 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 24 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Primary

Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post Treatment

Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.

Time frame: 72hr post treatment two

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr - Very Tolerable19 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Topical Combination TherapySubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr - Tolerable2 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr Very Intolerable0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr - Very Tolerable17 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr - Tolerable1 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr Having No Opinion0 Participants
Standard of CareSubject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post TreatmentTx 2 at 72 hr InTolerable0 Participants
Secondary

Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale

Investigator assessment of improvement in wrinkles and elastosis where Class I indicates fine wrinkles, Class II indicates fine to moderate depth wrinkles with a moderate number of lines and Class III indicates fine to deep wrinkles, numerous lines with or without redundant skin folds with a score of 1 - 3 (Mild) indicates fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines, a score of 4 - 6 (Moderate) indicates distinct papular elastosis (\[indvidual papules with yellow translucency under direct lighting\] and dyschromia and a score of 7 - 9 (Severe) indicates multipapular and confluent elastosis \[thickened yellow and pallid\] approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis. A lower class and a lower score means a better outcome. Subjects were divided into 3 categories - No change in FWES score, change in FWES score by one and non-evaluable.

Time frame: change in appearance of wrinkles from baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapyFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleNo change in FWES score23 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleFWES score increased by one2 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleNon-evaluable0 Participants
Standard of CareFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleNon-evaluable1 Participants
Standard of CareFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleNo change in FWES score23 Participants
Standard of CareFitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis ScaleFWES score increased by one0 Participants
Secondary

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

Investigator assessment of aesthetic improvement where 1 shows exceptional improvement, 2 shows very improved, 3 shows improvement, 4 shows unchanged and 5 indicates that the subject appearance has worsened. A low score means a better outome. Subjects were categorized to either GAIS improved or GAIS no change.

Time frame: change in skin appearance between baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapyGlobal Aesthetic Improvement ScaleGAIS Improved12 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyGlobal Aesthetic Improvement ScaleGAIS No Change8 Participants
Standard of CareGlobal Aesthetic Improvement ScaleGAIS Improved14 Participants
Standard of CareGlobal Aesthetic Improvement ScaleGAIS No Change9 Participants
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale

10 cm Subject discomfort scale where 10 cm indicates 'Pain as bad as it can be' and 0 cm indicates there is no pain at all associated with the application of the treatment. Zero pain means a better outcome. Subjects were categorized as to having no pain (0 - 0.4cm), mild pain (0.5 - 4.4cm), moderate pain (4.5 - 7.4cm) and severe pain (7.5 - 10cm).

Time frame: immediately following radio-frequency treatment

Population: Not all subjects reported VAS for each treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Severe Pain (7.5 - 10 cm)1 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Severe Pain (7.5 - 10 cm)2 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Mild Pain (0.5 - 4.4 cm)16 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2No pain (0 - 0.4cm)2 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1No pain (0 - 0.4cm)1 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Mild Pain (0.5 - 4.4 cm)11 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Moderate Pain (4.5 - 7.4 cm)6 Participants
Topical Combination TherapyVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Moderate Pain (4.5 - 7.4 cm)7 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Moderate Pain (4.5 - 7.4 cm)7 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Severe Pain (7.5 - 10 cm)2 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1No pain (0 - 0.4cm)1 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Mild Pain (0.5 - 4.4 cm)13 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Moderate Pain (4.5 - 7.4 cm)8 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 1Severe Pain (7.5 - 10 cm)2 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2No pain (0 - 0.4cm)0 Participants
Standard of CareVisual Analog ScaleTreatment 2Mild Pain (0.5 - 4.4 cm)9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026