Skip to content

Effect of Low-Level Laser on Pain and Healing of Donor Site Following Free Gingival Graft

The Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Patient's Pain and Healing of Palatal Donor Site Following Free Gingival Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02896283
Enrollment
12
Registered
2016-09-12
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2016-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

wound healing, low-level laser therapy, gingival recession

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized split-mouth design clinical trial is to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of diode laser in the healing of donor site of palate in free gingival graft.

Detailed description

Free gingival graft is the most predictable and successful method for increasing the width of keratinized tissue around teeth/dental implants and vestibular deepening. However, patient discomfort during the healing time is a major disadvantage of this procedure. Several methods have been introduced to accelerate the healing time and reduction of patient's pain during first days after surgery. Low-level lasers have shown promising results in biostimulation of cell growth and differentiation in cultures. However, there are lack of well designed double blind placebo controlled randomized controlled clinical studies evaluating the effects of Low-level laser therapy in acceleration of wound healing and pain relief of patients undergoing free gingival grafts.

Interventions

RADIATIONLow-level laser therapy

Low-level laser therapy with the following parameters: Wavelength:660 nanometer, power: 200 mW, continuous mode, tme of irradiation: 32 seconds

RADIATIONTurned-off laser

Laser device is turned-off. All parameters are like experimental group, however the laser in turned-off.

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* lack of keratinized tissue around teeth (bilateral)

Exclusion criteria

* patients with systemic diseases * non-cooperative patients * smokers * poor oral hygiene * root surface restorations or active caries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
degree of epithelializationAt day 73% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was applied to the wound by a sterile gause to see the bubbling * Complete epithelialization: bubble was not seen * Partial epithelialization: bubbles were seen in lesser than half of donor site * No epithelialization: bubble were seen in more than half of donor site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scoreat day 1ask from patient about numbers of tablet consumption,record VAS analysis
Clinical healingat day 1Photographs were taken from donor and recipient sites. Three expert blinded periodontist photographs photographs based on shade,morphology and texture at two sessions by 48 hours interval.

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026