Skip to content

MOTIVATional intErviewing to Improve Self-care in Heart Failure Patients

MOTIVATional intErviewing to Improve Self-care in Heart Failure Patients (MOTIVATE-HF): Study Protocol of a Three-arm Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02894502
Acronym
MOTIVATE-HF
Enrollment
510
Registered
2016-09-09
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2021-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Self-care, Motivational interviewing, Heart failure, Caregivers

Brief summary

The aims of this study will be to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) to improve self-care in heart failure (HF) patients and caregiver contributions to HF self-care. Also this study will evaluate the effect of MI on the following secondary outcomes: In HF patients: HF somatic symptom perception, generic and specific quality of life, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, mutuality with caregiver, hospitalizations, use of emergency services, and mortality; In caregivers: generic quality of life, anxiety and depression, mutuality with patient, preparedness, social support and sleep quality.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational interviewing

The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines.

Sponsors

Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of HF (for patient), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II- IV (for patient), Inadequate self-care assessed with the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (for patient), Being the informal caregiver of the patients (for caregiver).

Exclusion criteria

Severe cognitive impairment evaluated with the Six-item screener (for patient), Acute coronary syndrome during the last three months (for patient), Living in a residential settings (e.g., nursing home) (for patient), Patients not willing to participate in the study (for caregiver).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-care Maintenance in Patients3 months from the interventionSelf-care in HF patients will be measured with the Self-Care of HF Index V.6.2. Since this instrument has three separate scales, we considered as a primary outcome the score of the Self-care Maintenance scale. The Self-Care Maintenance scale has a score between 0 and 100 with higher score meaning better self-care. Self-Care Maintenance is considered adequate when the score is at least 70.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Caregiver Generic Physical and Mental Quality of Life3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionPatient and caregiver generic physical and mental quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
Patient and Caregiver Anxiety and Depression3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionPatient and caregiver anxiety and depression will be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Patient HF Specific Quality of Life3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionPatient HF specific quality of life will be evaluated with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Patient and Caregiver Quality of Nocturnal Sleep3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionWe will use the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Patient and Caregiver Mutuality3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionWe will use the Mutuality Scale
Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionBurden of HF symptoms will be measured with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS). The HFSPS has a range score between 0 and 90; the higher the score, the higher the burden of symptoms caused by heart failure.
Caregiver Perceived Social Support3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionWe will use the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale
Patient Hospitalizations3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionThe number of patient hospitalizations will be measured asking the caregiver how many time the patient was hospitalized from at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Use of Emergency Services3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionHow many times the patient has used the emergency services will be evaluated by asking the caregiver how many time the patient used after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Death3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionDeath rates will be evaluated in the three arms of the study by caregiver interview at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Caregiver Preparedness3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the interventionCaregiver Preparedness will be evaluated with the Caregiver Preparedness Scale

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients
In this arm the interventions will be delivered only to patients Motivational interviewing: The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines.
155
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers
In this arm the interventions will be delivered both to patients and caregivers Motivational interviewing: The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines.
177
Control Group
This Group will receive the usual care
178
Total510

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
BaselineDeath319
BaselineWithdrawal by Subject243136
First Follow upDeath223
First Follow upWithdrawal by Subject322937
Second Follow upDeath231
Second Follow upWithdrawal by Subject131513
Third Follow upDeath110
Third Follow upWithdrawal by Subject563

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControl GroupMotivational Interviewing Only for PatientsMotivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
381 Participants130 Participants119 Participants132 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
127 Participants47 Participants35 Participants45 Participants
Age, Continuous72.37 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28
72.45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.66
72.19 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
72.45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale30.87 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.46
31.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.95
30.55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
30.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.25
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
510 Participants178 Participants155 Participants177 Participants
Self-Care of Heart Failure Index45.55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.39
44.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.61
45.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23
45.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.35
Sex: Female, Male
Female
214 Participants69 Participants75 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
296 Participants109 Participants80 Participants107 Participants
SF-12 (Physical Component Summary)35.46 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
35.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
36.01 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35
35.01 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 1557 / 17713 / 178
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Self-care Maintenance in Patients

Self-care in HF patients will be measured with the Self-Care of HF Index V.6.2. Since this instrument has three separate scales, we considered as a primary outcome the score of the Self-care Maintenance scale. The Self-Care Maintenance scale has a score between 0 and 100 with higher score meaning better self-care. Self-Care Maintenance is considered adequate when the score is at least 70.

Time frame: 3 months from the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsSelf-care Maintenance in Patients52.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.67
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversSelf-care Maintenance in Patients54.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36
Control GroupSelf-care Maintenance in Patients49.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.49
Secondary

Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients

Burden of HF symptoms will be measured with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS). The HFSPS has a range score between 0 and 90; the higher the score, the higher the burden of symptoms caused by heart failure.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Population: Patients with heart failure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsBurden of HF Symptoms in Patients24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversBurden of HF Symptoms in Patients17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Control GroupBurden of HF Symptoms in Patients22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Secondary

Caregiver Perceived Social Support

We will use the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Caregiver Preparedness

Caregiver Preparedness will be evaluated with the Caregiver Preparedness Scale

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Death

Death rates will be evaluated in the three arms of the study by caregiver interview at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Population: The above participants were those who were randomized initially in the three arms.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath3 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed128 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath3 month follow-upNumber of Deaths3 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath3 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study24 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath6 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed94 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath6 month follow-upNumber of Deaths5 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath6 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study56 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath9 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed79 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath9 month follow-upNumber of Deaths7 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath9 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study69 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath12 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed73 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath12 month follow-upNumber of Deaths8 Participants
Motivational Interviewing Only for PatientsDeath12 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study74 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath12 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study81 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath3 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed145 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath9 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed96 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath9 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study75 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath3 month follow-upNumber of Deaths1 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath6 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study60 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath12 month follow-upNumber of Deaths7 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath3 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study31 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath9 month follow-upNumber of Deaths6 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath6 month follow-upNumber of Deaths3 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath6 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed114 Participants
Motivational Interviewing to Patients and CaregiversDeath12 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed89 Participants
Control GroupDeath6 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed93 Participants
Control GroupDeath6 month follow-upNumber of Deaths12 Participants
Control GroupDeath12 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed76 Participants
Control GroupDeath6 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study73 Participants
Control GroupDeath9 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed79 Participants
Control GroupDeath9 month follow-upNumber of Deaths13 Participants
Control GroupDeath12 month follow-upNumber of Deaths13 Participants
Control GroupDeath3 month follow-upOverall Number of Participants Analyzed133 Participants
Control GroupDeath3 month follow-upNumber of Deaths9 Participants
Control GroupDeath9 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study86 Participants
Control GroupDeath3 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study36 Participants
Control GroupDeath12 month follow-upNumber of refusals to continue the study89 Participants
Secondary

Patient and Caregiver Anxiety and Depression

Patient and caregiver anxiety and depression will be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Patient and Caregiver Generic Physical and Mental Quality of Life

Patient and caregiver generic physical and mental quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form 12 (SF-12).

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Patient and Caregiver Mutuality

We will use the Mutuality Scale

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Patient and Caregiver Quality of Nocturnal Sleep

We will use the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Patient HF Specific Quality of Life

Patient HF specific quality of life will be evaluated with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Patient Hospitalizations

The number of patient hospitalizations will be measured asking the caregiver how many time the patient was hospitalized from at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Secondary

Use of Emergency Services

How many times the patient has used the emergency services will be evaluated by asking the caregiver how many time the patient used after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026