Heart Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Self-care, Motivational interviewing, Heart failure, Caregivers
Brief summary
The aims of this study will be to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) to improve self-care in heart failure (HF) patients and caregiver contributions to HF self-care. Also this study will evaluate the effect of MI on the following secondary outcomes: In HF patients: HF somatic symptom perception, generic and specific quality of life, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, mutuality with caregiver, hospitalizations, use of emergency services, and mortality; In caregivers: generic quality of life, anxiety and depression, mutuality with patient, preparedness, social support and sleep quality.
Interventions
The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Diagnosis of HF (for patient), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II- IV (for patient), Inadequate self-care assessed with the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (for patient), Being the informal caregiver of the patients (for caregiver).
Exclusion criteria
Severe cognitive impairment evaluated with the Six-item screener (for patient), Acute coronary syndrome during the last three months (for patient), Living in a residential settings (e.g., nursing home) (for patient), Patients not willing to participate in the study (for caregiver).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-care Maintenance in Patients | 3 months from the intervention | Self-care in HF patients will be measured with the Self-Care of HF Index V.6.2. Since this instrument has three separate scales, we considered as a primary outcome the score of the Self-care Maintenance scale. The Self-Care Maintenance scale has a score between 0 and 100 with higher score meaning better self-care. Self-Care Maintenance is considered adequate when the score is at least 70. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and Caregiver Generic Physical and Mental Quality of Life | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Patient and caregiver generic physical and mental quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form 12 (SF-12). |
| Patient and Caregiver Anxiety and Depression | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Patient and caregiver anxiety and depression will be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale |
| Patient HF Specific Quality of Life | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Patient HF specific quality of life will be evaluated with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire |
| Patient and Caregiver Quality of Nocturnal Sleep | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | We will use the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index |
| Patient and Caregiver Mutuality | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | We will use the Mutuality Scale |
| Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Burden of HF symptoms will be measured with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS). The HFSPS has a range score between 0 and 90; the higher the score, the higher the burden of symptoms caused by heart failure. |
| Caregiver Perceived Social Support | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | We will use the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale |
| Patient Hospitalizations | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | The number of patient hospitalizations will be measured asking the caregiver how many time the patient was hospitalized from at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention. |
| Use of Emergency Services | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | How many times the patient has used the emergency services will be evaluated by asking the caregiver how many time the patient used after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention. |
| Death | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Death rates will be evaluated in the three arms of the study by caregiver interview at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention. |
| Caregiver Preparedness | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention | Caregiver Preparedness will be evaluated with the Caregiver Preparedness Scale |
Countries
Italy
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients In this arm the interventions will be delivered only to patients
Motivational interviewing: The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines. | 155 |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers In this arm the interventions will be delivered both to patients and caregivers
Motivational interviewing: The intervention will consist of a brief session of motivational interviewing (MI) performed by a trained nurse. During MI, the interventionist will address one or two aspects of self-care that the participants want to address. After this first intervention, the same interventionist will contact the participant by telephone to improve the first intervention and provide further support as needed. These telephone contact will be done three times at two week intervals following the first intervention (for a total of two months). Patients and caregivers that receive the intervention also will be given informational material on HF management that is consistent with international guidelines. | 177 |
| Control Group This Group will receive the usual care | 178 |
| Total | 510 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Death | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Baseline | Withdrawal by Subject | 24 | 31 | 36 |
| First Follow up | Death | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| First Follow up | Withdrawal by Subject | 32 | 29 | 37 |
| Second Follow up | Death | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Second Follow up | Withdrawal by Subject | 13 | 15 | 13 |
| Third Follow up | Death | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Third Follow up | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 6 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Control Group | Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 381 Participants | 130 Participants | 119 Participants | 132 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 127 Participants | 47 Participants | 35 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 72.37 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28 | 72.45 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.66 | 72.19 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29 | 72.45 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79 |
| Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale | 30.87 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.46 | 31.83 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.95 | 30.55 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2 | 30.18 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.25 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 510 Participants | 178 Participants | 155 Participants | 177 Participants |
| Self-Care of Heart Failure Index | 45.55 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.39 | 44.98 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.61 | 45.72 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23 | 45.98 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.35 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 214 Participants | 69 Participants | 75 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 296 Participants | 109 Participants | 80 Participants | 107 Participants |
| SF-12 (Physical Component Summary) | 35.46 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57 | 35.42 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 | 36.01 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35 | 35.01 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 8 / 155 | 7 / 177 | 13 / 178 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Self-care Maintenance in Patients
Self-care in HF patients will be measured with the Self-Care of HF Index V.6.2. Since this instrument has three separate scales, we considered as a primary outcome the score of the Self-care Maintenance scale. The Self-Care Maintenance scale has a score between 0 and 100 with higher score meaning better self-care. Self-Care Maintenance is considered adequate when the score is at least 70.
Time frame: 3 months from the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Self-care Maintenance in Patients | 52.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.67 |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Self-care Maintenance in Patients | 54.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.36 |
| Control Group | Self-care Maintenance in Patients | 49.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.49 |
Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients
Burden of HF symptoms will be measured with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS). The HFSPS has a range score between 0 and 90; the higher the score, the higher the burden of symptoms caused by heart failure.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Population: Patients with heart failure
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients | 24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients | 17.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Control Group | Burden of HF Symptoms in Patients | 22.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
Caregiver Perceived Social Support
We will use the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Caregiver Preparedness
Caregiver Preparedness will be evaluated with the Caregiver Preparedness Scale
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Death
Death rates will be evaluated in the three arms of the study by caregiver interview at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Population: The above participants were those who were randomized initially in the three arms.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 3 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 128 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 3 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 24 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 6 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 94 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 5 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 56 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 9 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 79 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 7 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 69 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 12 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 73 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 8 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing Only for Patients | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 74 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 81 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 3 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 145 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 9 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 96 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 75 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 1 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 60 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 7 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 31 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 6 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 3 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 6 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 114 Participants |
| Motivational Interviewing to Patients and Caregivers | Death | 12 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 89 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 6 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 93 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 12 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 12 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 76 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 6 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 73 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 9 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 79 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 13 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 13 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 3 month follow-up | Overall Number of Participants Analyzed | 133 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of Deaths | 9 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 9 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 86 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 3 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 36 Participants |
| Control Group | Death | 12 month follow-up | Number of refusals to continue the study | 89 Participants |
Patient and Caregiver Anxiety and Depression
Patient and caregiver anxiety and depression will be evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Patient and Caregiver Generic Physical and Mental Quality of Life
Patient and caregiver generic physical and mental quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Patient and Caregiver Mutuality
We will use the Mutuality Scale
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Patient and Caregiver Quality of Nocturnal Sleep
We will use the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Patient HF Specific Quality of Life
Patient HF specific quality of life will be evaluated with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Patient Hospitalizations
The number of patient hospitalizations will be measured asking the caregiver how many time the patient was hospitalized from at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention
Use of Emergency Services
How many times the patient has used the emergency services will be evaluated by asking the caregiver how many time the patient used after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the intervention