Skip to content

Metronomic Versus Conventional Chemotherapy in as Maintenance Treatment in mCRC

Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy Versus Conventional Chemotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02893540
Enrollment
250
Registered
2016-09-08
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2016-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

The optimum regimen of maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unknown. This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy.

Detailed description

In this Prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial, the investigators will recruit 250 mCRC patients who have finished 18 to 24 weeks first-line chemotherapy and disease evaluation is SD, PR or CR. Then, the patients will be randomised into two group. The experimental group, capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy versus capecitabine conventional chemotherapy as control group. These treatment regimens will be continued until progression, death, or an unacceptable adverse event. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and toxic effects.

Interventions

DRUGCapecitabine

we are going to compare two maintenance treatment models with capecitabine in this study

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained); * Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible); * Unidimensionally measurable disease (\> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or \> 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation; * In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment; * Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases; * Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS14 monthsfrom randomizing to progression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OS20 monthsfrom signing informed consent form to death
QOL20 monthsQLQ-C30

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHAO LI, MD,Ph.D
drlihao@163.com86-15000929050
Backup ContactJUN ZHANG, MD,Ph.D
junzhang@188.com86-18917762326

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026