Skip to content

Analysis of a Virtual Reality Task in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Analysis of Interaction of Different Devices in a Virtual Reality Task in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02891434
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-09-07
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, motor learning, motor abilities

Brief summary

The task consists in reach as much bubbles as they can, the bubbles appear on the screen of the computer and should be reached in 10 seconds. To accomplish that, three different devices will be used: (1) Kinect for Windows Microsoft - which consists of a sensor that captures body movements (including upper limbs). And (2) the Leap Motion (LMCH, Leap Motion, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA), and (3) Touch Screen. To describe motor impairments was used the Motor Function Measure Scale; Scale Vignos and Scale Egen Klassifikation;

Detailed description

To evaluate the performance of interaction devices was used a computer game proposed by the Department of Information Systems, University of São Paulo. Chosen due to its low cognitive demands, ease and adaptability for use in people with DMD. The program, offers a task designed to measure various neuropsychological aspects of planning, execution, spatial organization, which involves the operation of the intention to move to achieve a virtual object and the planning of this action. Considering different interfaces, opted for three interfaces. Two of theme without physical contact, represented by (1) Kinect for Windows Microsoft - which consists of a sensor that captures body movements (including upper limbs). And (2) the Leap Motion (LMCH, Leap Motion, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) - virtual interface by means of a sensor, in which there is also no need to touch or physical contact , but its catchment area is focused only on hands and fingers. In addition, an interface that required physical contact -Touch Screen - a sensitive monitor to touch the computer screen itself. The use of interfaces with and without physical contact are interesting to identify the functionality of the devices. Therefore, the game presented 126 bubbles arranged in rows and columns . The goal was that the participant could achieve (changing color) the largest number of bubbles during 10 seconds, thereby defining a range zone for the specified time. After defining the scope zone, the therapist established a red target bubble, which was chosen in the center of bottom of range line. The participant should play this target bubble using one of the devices, Touch Screen, Kinect and Leap Motion. After touch of target bubble, the game had another red bubble in a random position, within range of area. After reaching the random bubble, the bubble target was displayed again, and so on. The game features red bubbles within the range area, and sometimes out of range, thus creating a higher degree of difficulty and to encourage participants to challenge their limits. The Participants were divided into groups which performed the tasks with different interaction devices, more virtual feature (not touch the computer using Kinect or leap motion) or real (to touch the computer screen).

Interventions

Participants performed acquisition and retention on TouchScreen, transfer 1 on Kinect and transfer 2 on LeapMotion.

Participants performed acquisition and retention on Kinect, transfer 1 on TouchScreen and transfer 2 on LeapMotion.

Participants performed acquisition and retention on LeapMotion, transfer 1 on TouchScreen and transfer 2 on Kinect.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
9 Years to 34 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of DMD.

Exclusion criteria

* presence disorders in cognitive function that would prevent comprehension of the experimental instruction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor performance improvement in a virtual Timing Coincident task, with better performance on the LeapMotion compared to TouchScreen and Kinect.3 monthsAnalysis of the motor performance using a virtual Coincident timing task in different devices to compare wether a task with or without contact promote better performance for people with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026