Skip to content

Study to Assess the Efficacy of Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Multicentre Randomized Double Blind, Crossover, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Liraglutide on Lung Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (LIRALUNG Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02889510
Enrollment
76
Registered
2016-09-05
Start date
2016-10-04
Completion date
2019-12-16
Last updated
2021-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

diabetes, liraglutide, lung function

Brief summary

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is related to reduced pulmonary function. As experimental studies with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) have shown an increase in pulmonary surfactant secretion, and the GLP-1 receptor has been found in significant amounts in the lung, it could be hypothesized that the treatment with liraglutide (a GL-1 agonist) will improve this reduced pulmonary function

Detailed description

There is growing evidence to suggest an association between type 2 diabetes and impaired pulmonary function. In this regard, several cross-sectional studies have appeared showing decreased indices of forced expiration, lung volume and diffusion capacity as the main lung dysfunctions detected in type 2 diabetic populations. In fact, diabetes is frequently co-morbid with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study showed a faster pulmonary function decline in type 2 diabetic patients than in other participants. This is important because the reduction of FEV1 has been demonstrated an independent cause of mortality in diabetic patients. Interestingly, lung function measures start to decrease several years before the diagnosis of diabetes. In this regard an investigation found that insulin resistance is an independent determinant of pulmonary function in non-diabetic morbidly obese women. In addition, the results suggest that the metabolic pathways related to insulin resistance are crucial in initiating lung abnormalities in type 2 diabetic patients. The reasons for the association between respiratory disease and diabetes are unclear. However, the relationship between type 2 diabetes and muscle strength, the impairment in lung elastic properties, and the presence of a low-grade chronic inflammation state are involved. In supporting these findings, thickening of the alveolar epithelia and pulmonary capillary basal lamina, fibrosis, centrilobular emphysema, and pulmonary microangiopathy have been detected in autopsies of diabetic patients. In addition, defects in the bronchiolar surfactant layer, which is involved in maintaining airway stability and diameter, may also be considered a contributing factor to the impairment of airway calibre regulation in diabetic patients. When the alveolocapillary barrier is damaged, surfactant proteins leak into the bloodstream. A recent population-based random sample study has described how increased circulating levels of surfactant protein A, the major surfactant-associated protein, were associated with altered glucose tolerance and insulin resistance. Therefore, surfactant defects in diabetic individuals may also lead to an increase in airway resistance and to a reduction in ventilatory patterns as observed in our studies. In addition, as experimental studies have shown that glucagon-like peptide 1 plays a role in the stimulation of surfactant production, its underlying deficit in type 2 diabetes could also enhance the airway resistance observed in these patients. However, the beneficial effects on pulmonary function using incretin-based therapies remain to be elucidated. Clinical trial study hypothesis is that treatment with an incretin mimetic such as liraglutide may ameliorate lung function parameters in type 2 diabetics patients, independently of weight reduction. This hypothesis is based on the following factors: 1. \- There is growing evidence to suggest an association between type 2 diabetes and impaired pulmonary function. 2. \- In patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is severely reduced or absent, contributing to the reduced lung function parameters observed in type 2 diabetic patients. 3. \- GLP-1 stimulates surfactant production in in vitro studies and, in consequence, the increase in surfactant production induced by liraglutide could be the main factor involved in the respiratory improvement.

Interventions

DRUGliraglutide

7-week subcutaneous liraglutide once daily

DRUGplacebo

7-week subcutaneous placebo once daily

Sponsors

Dynamic Solutions
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Lecube, Albert, M.D.
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent. * Subjects between 40 and 65 years old. Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with more than 5 years of evolution of disease. * Metformin (alone or in combination with sulfonylurea and / or insulin and / or thiazolidinediones) at a stable dose for at least the past 3 months. * HbA1c ≥ 7,0 y ≤ 9,0 %. * BMI between 30 and 40 kg / m2. * No pulmonary disease (COPD, asthma, fibrosis, etc) known. * Baseline FEV1 decline of equal or greater than 10% in the percentage of the theoretical value. * Chest radiography without significant changes in the lung parenchyma

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Treatment with inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 glitazones and / or * SGLT2 inhibitors. * Active and former smokers for less than five years ago smoking. * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. * Respiratory sleep disorders that require treatment with continuous positive pressure in the airway. * Asthma treatment with bronchodilators. * Previous bariatric surgery. * Cardiovascular disease, heart failure and / or stroke. * Pathology of the chest wall. * Serum creatinine\> 1.7 mg / dl. * Abnormal results in liver function test (Alanine transaminase/ Aspartate Aminotransferase greater than twice the upper limit of normal). * History of acute or chronic pancreatitis. * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer or Multiple * Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN ) type 2. * Active neoplasms or neoplastic patients considered disease-free history from less than 5 years ago. * Women of childbearing age who are pregnant (positive pregnancy test within 14 days before the start of treatment) or intend to get pregnant. * Lactating women. * Women of childbearing potential not using adequate contraception (such as oral contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier method of birth control along with spermicide or surgical sterilization) or unwilling to use during the study (as required by local laws or practices).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D Protein7 weeksChanges from baseline in serum levels of surfactant A and D protein. Values for surfactant A or D protein after 7 treatment weeks (liraglutide or placebo) are registered.
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Maximum Mid-expiratory Flow (FEF25-75)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced vital capacity (FVC). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Total Lung Capacity (TLC)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Total lung capacity (TLC).
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Functional Capacity (RFC)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Residual functional capacity (RFC) are registered. However, this parameter was not determined in patients due to an error in the programm used.
Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Volume (RV)7 weeksChanges from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by residual volume (RV).

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

It is a cross-over study so patients are in both arms if they complete all the study. The order of the treatment received depends on the group assigned: A= treatment with subcutaneus liraglutide for 7 weeks once daily followed by treatment with subcutaneus placebo for 7 weeks B= treatment with subcutaneus placebo for 7 weeks once daily followed by treatment with subcutaneus liraglutide for 7 weeks 76 participants were enrolled in the study but only 72 started the treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants in the study.
76
Total76

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
70 Participants
Age, Continuous58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
34.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Placebo first,then liraglutide
35 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Fasting plasma glucose
Liraglutide first, then placebo
11.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Fasting plasma glucose
Placebo first, then liraglutide
10.9 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
FEV1/FVC
Liraglutide first, then placebo
81.6 %
FEV1/FVC
Placebo first, then liraglutide
82.3 %
Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
81.1 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
77.8 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
81.9 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.8
Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
79.6 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
67.2 mmol/mol
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
63.7 mmol/mol
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
79.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.2
Maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
70.1 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.9
Never smokers38 Participants
Non obstructive ventilatory defect (VD)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
27 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.5
Non obstructive ventilatory defect (VD)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
25 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.4
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Liraglutide first, then placebo
80.7 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.2
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Placebo first, then liraglutide
80.7 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arab
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
73 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants
Surfactant A protein
Liraglutide first, then placebo
35.6 ng/ml
Surfactant A protein
Placebo first, then liraglutide
34.2 ng/ml
Surfactant D protein
Liraglutide first, then placebo
196.5 ng/ml
Surfactant D protein
Placebo first, then liraglutide
184.2 ng/ml
Systolic blood pressure
Liraglutide first, then placebo
146.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
Systolic blood pressure
Placebo first,then liraglutide
145.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 700 / 70
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 7013 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 701 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beggining and at the end of the period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)4.1 % (FEV1)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)4.3 % (FEV1)
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D Protein

Changes from baseline in serum levels of surfactant A and D protein. Values for surfactant A or D protein after 7 treatment weeks (liraglutide or placebo) are registered.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 48 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 48 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D ProteinA protein40.9 ng/ml
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D ProteinD protein169.6 ng/ml
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D ProteinA protein41.3 ng/ml
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Serum Levels of Surfactant A and D ProteinD protein201.5 ng/ml
Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC)-2.1 % (FEV1/FVC)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC)1.7 % (FEV1/FVC)
Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by forced vital capacity (FVC). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 50 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)5.4 % (FVC)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)0.2 % (FVC)
Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Maximum Mid-expiratory Flow (FEF25-75)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75). Mean difference between 7 weeks after treatment visit and baseline visit is registered.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 46 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 46 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Maximum Mid-expiratory Flow (FEF25-75)8.0 % (FEF25-75)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Maximum Mid-expiratory Flow (FEF25-75)12.5 % (FEF25-75)
Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Functional Capacity (RFC)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Residual functional capacity (RFC) are registered. However, this parameter was not determined in patients due to an error in the programm used.

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: This parameter was not determined in patients due to an error in the programm used.

Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Volume (RV)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by residual volume (RV).

Time frame: 7 weeks

Population: 59 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of liraglutide treatment (A group + B group) but only 12 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.~61 patients ended the period of 7 weeks of placebo treatment (A group + B group) but only 12 have this parameter determined both at the beginning and end of the period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Volume (RV)3.2 % (RV)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Residual Volume (RV)-1.1 % (RV)
Secondary

Changes From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Total Lung Capacity (TLC)

Changes from baseline on measurements of respiratory function defined by Total lung capacity (TLC).

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Total Lung Capacity (TLC)-2.6 % (TLCO)
PlaceboChanges From Baseline on Measurements of Respiratory Function Defined by Total Lung Capacity (TLC)-3.1 % (TLCO)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026