Skip to content

Fracture Healing Assessed by HR-pQCT After Administration of Calcium and Vitamin D

Assessment of Fracture Healing by High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) and Bone Strength Analysis in Standard Care and After Immediate Administration of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02889237
Enrollment
52
Registered
2016-09-05
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2020-06-18
Last updated
2021-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Fracture

Keywords

Fracture healing, Calcium supplementation, Vitamin D supplementation, HR-pQCT

Brief summary

This study is designed as a single-blind RCT in 80 postmenopausal women to compare the effect of immediate administration of daily calcium supplementation (1000 mg calcium) or two daily dosages of calcium + vitamin D (1000 mg calcium + 880 IU vitamin D or 1000 mg calcium + 1760 IU vitamin D) to standard care (administration of vitamin D3 12 weeks after fracture) in terms of calculated bone strength based on analysis of cortical and trabecular bone parameters using HR-pQCT, fracture healing and functional outcome.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium

Immediate administration of daily calcium supplementation for 12 weeks

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium + low dose vitamin D

Immediate administration of daily calcium and low dose vitamin D (1 sachet CaD 1000/880) supplementation for 12 weeks

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium + high dose vitamin D

Immediate administration of daily calcium and high dose vitamin D (2 sachets CaD 500/880) supplementation for 12 weeks

Sponsors

VieCuri Medical Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal women older than 50 years who present themselves in clinic with a distal radius fracture due to a trauma. * Patients with a stable distal radius fracture treated by cast immobilization. * Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the scheduled biochemical and radiographic evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation. * Patients who signed the Ethics Committee approved specific Informed Consent Form prior to inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent surgery of the wrist or radius on a previous occasion on the same side or who need surgery this time. * Patients with active or suspected infection such as pneumonia or complicated urinary tract infection in the last 3 months. * Patients with malignancy or a pathological fracture in the last 12 months. * Patients with a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit, e.g. Parkinson's disease, which would limit the ability to assess the performance during the healing period. * Patients with known systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration, such as: hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease with eGFR\<30 ml/min, sarcoidosis, hypercalcemia, * Patients with an active inflammatory disease during the last year such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematous, inflammatory bowel disease, e.g. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. * The use of glucocorticoids during the last 12 months. * Patients with an allergy to calcium, calcium carbonate, cholecalciferol, aspartame, citric-acid, lactose, dimethicone, methylcellulose, sorbic acid, macrogole, polyvidone, mannitol, orange flavour, natriumsaccharine, starch or sucrose. * Patients, who as judged by the principal Investigator, are mentally incompetent or are unlikely to be compliant with the follow-up evaluation schedule. * Patients with other severe concurrent joint involvements that can affect their outcome. * Patients who are already selected for another trial concerning distal radius fractures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone strength1 yearBone strength parameters will be assessed by HRpQCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture healing1 year
Functional outcome assessed by PRWE1 yearFunctional outcome is assessed using Patient-Related Wrist Examination (PRWE) questionnaire
Functional outcome assessed by QuickDASH1 yearFunctional outcome is assessed using QuickDASH questionnaires
Functional outcome assessed using VAS for pain score1 yearFunctional outcome is assessed using VAS for pain score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Functional outcome assessed using range of motion1 yearFunctional outcome is assessed by measuremt of range of motion of the fractured wrist

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026