Skip to content

Evaluating the Efficacy of Intranasal Oxytocin Among Individuals With Persistent Pain

Evaluating the Efficacy of Intranasal Oxytocin Among Individuals With Persistent Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02888574
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-09-05
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Pelvic Pain

Brief summary

This study is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-participants crossover investigation of the effect of intranasal oxytocin on pain and function among women with chronic pelvic pain.

Detailed description

1. Rationale: Oxytocin (OT) is a neuropeptide produced in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus. There exists at least three plausible mechanisms through which OT may decrease pain sensitivity. In brief, the first mechanism involves spinal signaling. A direct hypothalamo-spinal projection originating from the paraventricular nucleus transports OT, to the dorsal horn (Lamina-I, II, and IV), an area containing OT receptors that influence glutamate and GABA cellular signaling. The second mechanism involves an indirect pathway via the endogenous opioids. Evidence suggests that OT binds to opioid receptors and may also stimulate endogenous opioid release in the brain. Finally, OT may decrease pain by improving mood, decreasing anxiety, and mitigating the stress response. Thirty-three animal investigations have assessed OT-pain relationships with 29 reporting that exogenous administration and higher endogenous levels decreased pain. There is a lack of clarity of an OT-pain association in the human literature due to a paucity of methodologically rigorous trials. Thus far, OT administration has been reported to lower pain sensitivity among patients experiencing chronic back pain, headache, constipation, and colon pain. To date, no research has evaluated the association between intranasal OT and chronic pelvic pain. The association between OT and pain may be different in women with pelvic pain relative to other chronic pain conditions because of a potential peripheral OT-pain pathway. There is an abundance of OT receptors in the uterus, and OT is a potent uterogenic agent that is clinically used in large doses to stimulate uterine contractions and induce labor. While OT does not cross the blood-brain-barrier, the central administration of intranasal OT increases central and blood-plasma OT concentrations. Thus, intranasal OT administration may be associated with pain through central and peripheral pathways; however uterine contractions with 24IU doses of intranasal OT occur in only 1 in every 100-1000 people. 2. Research questions and objectives: This research is a pilot study of the efficacy of intranasal OT at improving pain and function among women with chronic pelvic pain of primarily musculoskeletal origin. 3. Design: This study will utilize a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subjects crossover design. Participants will complete 6-weeks of testing consisting of two 2-week intranasal administrations separated by a 2-week washout period

Interventions

DRUGIntranasal Oxytocin

Intranasal oxytocin (Syntocinon; Novartis, Switzerland)

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo nasal spray

Sponsors

University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-menopausal women with chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain (i.e., pain exceeding 6-months in duration that is located primarily in the pelvic region and reproducible on palpation to the muscles spanning the pelvic floor) will be eligible to participate if they: 1) have regular menstrual periods (monthly within a 21-35 day range); 2) using a permanent or barrier form of contraception; 3) can commit not to change their medication during the 6-weeks of this study; and 4) have a moderate amount of pain at baseline (i.e., a pain score of 4-7 out of 10 on a numeric rating scale). A baseline pain score of 4-7 out of 10 was selected to prevent floor and ceiling effects and ensure that participants have room to change throughout the course of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Muscle pain as a result of systemic disease, scoring positive on a urine pregnancy test, concurrent use of another nasal spray, nasal pathology (e.g., ears, nose, and throat diagnosis), diabetes insipidus, previous or concurrent use of narcotics delivered intranasally (e.g., cocaine), are contemplating pregnancy, or who have sacroiliac instability as defined by the European Guidelines. Women will also be excluded with they have a primary diagnosis of endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, interstitial cystitis, functional bowel disorder, fibromyalgia or neuropathic pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported pain14-daysThe Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-report positive and negative affect14-daysPositive and Negative Affect Scale
Self-report depressed mood, anxious mood, and stress14-dayDepression Anxiety Stress Scale
Self-report sleep14-dayMedical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026