Skip to content

Proficiency-Based Progression Training for Clinical Communication

The Effect of a Proficiency Based Progression Training Programme for Clinical Communication on ISBAR Performance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02886754
Enrollment
77
Registered
2016-09-01
Start date
2016-09-14
Completion date
2016-09-16
Last updated
2017-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Communication, Deteriorating Patient, ISBAR, Non Technical Skills, Performance, Proficiency-Based Progression, Simulation

Keywords

Clinical Communication, ISBAR, Simulation, Performance, Non technical skills, Proficiency

Brief summary

Importance: Clinical communication is an important source of medical error and preventable adverse events. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation training for ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication in the deteriorating patient. Setting: The study will be conducted in University College Cork, Ireland. Participants: Third year undergraduate nursing and fifth year medical students, who are scheduled to undertake ISBAR training as part of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) programme. Intervention: Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory: HSE group (the national e-learning programme only); S group (national e- learning plus simulation training) and PBP group (national e-learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation). Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

Detailed description

The first successful simulation validation study used a proficiency-based progression methodology. Since then the approach has been successfully deployed to produce superior technical skills but has not yet been validated for non-technical (communication) skills. The ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) has been selected as the standardised tool for clinical communication in relation to an acutely deteriorating patient in many healthcare organisations worldwide, including Ireland. The aim of this study is to explore whether proficiency-based progression (PBP) could be applied to simulation-based training for ISBAR performance to produce a superior skill set. The study will compare performance outcomes of students, who receive the national e-learning programme only with those who receive it in combination with either standard simulation or proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation. Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three training groups within their professional cohort (medicine or nursing) before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory: 1. Online learning only (HSE) -the national e-learning programme only 2. Standard simulation (S) -online learning plus simulation training 3. Proficiency based progression (PBP) -online learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation. Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient. All participants will be required to demonstrate a certificate of successful completion on the national e-learning programme within the previous 4 weeks as well as supplying baseline demographic information before undertaking the training. Performance metrics have previously been identified, operationally defined and agreed upon at a modified Delphi panel meeting consisting of medical and nursing experts for a series of paper-based simulation cases and a standardised high fidelity simulation case used as the assessment case. The proficiency benchmark for each case has been set based on the performance of experienced nursing and medical personnel on each case as a series of steps, errors and critical errors. Outcome assessment will be scored by reviewing recordings of ISBAR performance by each participant on the standardised case in the high fidelity laboratory.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProficiency-based progression

Use of validated metrics and performance benchmarks to simulation training

BEHAVIORALNational e-learning programme only

National e-learning programme (COMPASS)

Paper based simulation cases

Sponsors

University College Cork
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and outcome assessors were unaware of which intervention group subjects were allocated

Intervention model description

The study design is a parallel group, double-blind, randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Third year undergraduate nursing students Fifth year medical students

Exclusion criteria

Lack of consent Failure to successfully complete the National e-learning NEWS programme

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of those reaching the benchmark on the assessment case6 monthsIndependent review by two blinded assessors of recorded ISBAR phone call conducted in the high fidelity simulation setting

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of completed steps6 monthsNumber of successfully completed steps as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of total errors6 monthsNumber of total errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
Number of errors/critical errors6 monthsNumber of errors/critical errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026