Skip to content

A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02886715
Enrollment
1110
Registered
2016-09-01
Start date
2016-09-21
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2018-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Brief summary

A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Interventions

Tazarotene Cream 0.1% applied to cover the affected areas of the face once daily for 84 +/- 4 days.

Tazorac® applied to cover the affected areas of the face once daily for 84 +/- 4 days.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (vehicle of the test product) applied to cover the affected areas of the face once daily for 84 +/- 4 days.

Sponsors

Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy male or non-pregnant female aged ≥ 12 and ≤ 40 years with a clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris. * Must have a minimum of ≥ 25 non-inflammatory lesions and ≥ 20 inflammatory lesions and ≤ 2 nodulocystic lesions at baseline on the face. * Must have a definite clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris severity grade 2, 3, or 4 as per the Investigator's Global Assessment.

Exclusion criteria

* Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant during study participation. * Have a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to tazarotene, retinoids and/or any of the study medication ingredients. * Presence of any skin condition that would interfere with the diagnosis or assessment of acne vulgaris.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Inflammatory Lesion CountsWeek 12Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the inflammatory (papules and pustules) lesion counts
Change in Non-inflammatory Lesion CountsWeek 12Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesion counts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response of SuccessWeek 12The proportion of subjects with a clinical response of success at week 12, success defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment score that is at least two grades less than the baseline assessment

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

At Baseline Visit eligible subjects were randomized to the Test, Reference or Placebo product in a 2:2:1 ratio using an interactive response technology (IRT) system

Pre-assignment details

1154 subjects were screened for study participation, 1110 subjects were randomized and included in the statistical analyses. 25 investigative sites randomized subjects into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Test
Tazarotene Cream 0.1% (Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.)
442
Reference
TAZORAC® (tazarotene) Cream, 0.1% (Allergan, Inc.)
445
Placebo
Placebo (Vehicle of test product) (Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.)
223
Total1,110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event420
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy021
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up292610
Overall Studymissing722
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Drug020
Overall StudyPregnancy111
Overall StudyProtocol Violation321
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20185

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTestReferencePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous22.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
22.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
22.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
22.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
265 Participants252 Participants130 Participants647 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
177 Participants193 Participants93 Participants463 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
236 Participants215 Participants96 Participants547 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
206 Participants230 Participants127 Participants563 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4420 / 4450 / 223
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 44257 / 44512 / 223
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 4420 / 4450 / 223

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts

Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the inflammatory (papules and pustules) lesion counts

Time frame: Week 12

Population: mITT for superiority versus placebo, PP for equivalence versus Reference

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TestChange in Inflammatory Lesion Counts-58.44 percent changeStandard Error 1.33
ReferenceChange in Inflammatory Lesion Counts-60.07 percent changeStandard Error 1.32
PlaceboChange in Inflammatory Lesion Counts-53.28 percent changeStandard Error 1.81
90% CI: [94.39, 103.31]ANOVA
p-value: 0.018595% CI: [-9.46, -0.87]ANOVA
Primary

Change in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts

Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesion counts

Time frame: Week 12

Population: mITT for superiority versus placebo, PP for equivalence versus Reference

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TestChange in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts-50.11 percent changeStandard Error 1.27
ReferenceChange in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts-51.99 percent changeStandard Error 1.26
PlaceboChange in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts-45.72 percent changeStandard Error 1.73
90% CI: [93.42, 103.61]ANOVA
p-value: 0.035495% CI: [-8.48, -0.3]ANOVA
Secondary

Clinical Response of Success

The proportion of subjects with a clinical response of success at week 12, success defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment score that is at least two grades less than the baseline assessment

Time frame: Week 12

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TestClinical Response of Success20.0 percentage of participants
ReferenceClinical Response of Success23.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Response of Success15.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026