Skip to content

Patient Controlled Intrathecal Analgesia With Bupivacaine for Chronic Low Back Pain

Randomized, Double Blind, Cross Over Study Comparing Effectiveness of Traditional Opioids Versus Opioids in Admixture With Bupivacaine Upon Self-administration of Boluses Via a Personal Therapy Manager (PTM) in Intrathecal Pumps

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02886286
Enrollment
17
Registered
2016-09-01
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breakthrough Pain, Chronic Pain, Pain, Intractable

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the local anesthetic bupivacaine delivered intrathecally in small doses via PTM self-administered boluses significantly improves the breakthrough pain and functional status of patients with chronic intractable pain who are managed with an intrathecal drug delivery system.

Detailed description

Methodology /Technical Approach: Seventeen patients who are already using SynchroMed II pump containing an admixture of bupivacaine and an opioid and using PTM doses will receive Solution A during the first week of the study and will be crossed over to Solution B during the second week of the study. Solution A and Solution B would consist of either the patient's usual intrathecal opioid with bupivacaine at the same concentrations or the usual patient's intrathecal opioid at the same concentration but without bupivacaine. Only the Investigational Pharmacy at University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) would be aware of the contents of Solution A and Solution B. Patients and study personnel in the Pain Medicine Division would be blinded to the solution content. The sequence of pump refills will be as follows: * Week I: Patients will have the intrathecal pumps refilled with 10 milliliters of a Solution A or B, after removal of residual volume of baseline solution. * Week II: IT pump will be filled with 10 ml of Solution A or B (whichever solution subject did not receive Week 1), after removal of residual volume from Week I. Both patients and the evaluating physician will be blinded. In order to accomplish this, only the central compounding (investigational) pharmacy at UHCMC would make two solutions labeled: A or B respectively. Study subjects will be randomized and randomization order will be held at the pharmacy that will supply the medication. Patients will be kept on each solution for one week. Data will be collected daily Primary outcome measures will include 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both immediately before and within 30 minutes after a PTM bolus. Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Only 5 recording per day on days 3-7 and 10-14 will be available on the diary-thus patients would record pain scores only before and after the first 5 PTM boluses. Only the scores before and after the first 3 successful PTM boluses would be considered. Successful PTM activations would be determined by review of the patient PTM diary and the internal log from the intrathecal drug delivery system. Each recording on the PTM diary would be time matched to the successful PTM activation code in the internal log. This will obviate any potential mis-administered bolus whereby the patient does not activate the bolus device appropriately. Secondary outcome measures will include average NRS pain scores for the week, functional capacity as evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, Global Impression of Change and painDETECT. Other relevant data such as number of boluses used and paresthetic sensation post bolus (if felt)/patient guess of blinding arm would be recorded.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain

DRUGOpioid

Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
31 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age more than 30 years implanted with an intrathecal drug delivery device. * Intrathecal pump patients on stable dose for the last 3 months. * Using on average more than 2 and less than 10 PTM doses per day * Intrathecal medication admixture consisting of bupivacaine and another opioid (fentanyl or hydromorphone or morphine)

Exclusion criteria

* Using 10 or more PTM bolus doses per day or 2 or less PTM bolus doses per day * Pending litigation or worker compensation claim * Any recent (less than 3 month) procedures in spine (surgeries) or catheter adjustments. * Recent pump dose adjustment within the past 3 months * Pumps with medications other than bupivacaine/opioid combination. * Pregnant or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolusPatients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reportedOswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage. Interpretation of percentage scores: 0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reportedPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment 1. = very much improved 2. = much improved 3. = minimally improved 4. = no change 5. = worse 6. = much worse 7. = very much worse
Change From Baseline in painDETECTDay 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reportedpainDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reportedAverage Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain
Change From Baseline in Treatment SatisfactionDay 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reportedA 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bupivacaine + Opioid
Intrathecal solution has bupivacaine with an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine). Patients will administer PTM bolus of bupivacaine with opioid. The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be \>2 and \<10. The bupivacaine dosage would range between 0.4 and 1.5 mg per bolus. The opioid dose will vary depending on the concentration of the opioid in the solution. Bupivacaine: Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain Opioid: Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain
8
Opioid
Intrathecal solution has only an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine) and no bupivacaine. Patients will administer PTM bolus of opioid without bupivacaine. This opioid bolus dose would be the same as they would have received prior to enrolling in the study (with bupivacaine). The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be \>2 and \<10. Opioid: Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain
8
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studypump motor stall01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpioidTotalBupivacaine + Opioid
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous63.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
63.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93
63.125 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.96
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants16 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 163 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)

Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Time frame: Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
OpioidChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)1.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)

Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
OpioidChange From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)-0.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage. Interpretation of percentage scores: 0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms

Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
OpioidChange From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)2.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in painDETECT

painDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.

Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in painDETECT0.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
OpioidChange From Baseline in painDETECT0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment 1. = very much improved 2. = much improved 3. = minimally improved 4. = no change 5. = worse 6. = much worse 7. = very much worse

Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-0.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
OpioidChange From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)1.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction

A 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction.

Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Population: All participants who received each intervention were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine + OpioidChange From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
OpioidChange From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026