Skip to content

Dorsal Versus Volar Approach for CapFlex-PIP© Implantation

Dorsal Versus Volar Approach for CapFlex-PIP© Implantation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02886078
Enrollment
3
Registered
2016-09-01
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The primary objective is to investigate the active extension six months after implantation of the CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty, comparing the dorsal with the volar approach. This is a randomized controlled trial including 70 patients with PIP OA indicated for CapFlex arthroplasty.

Detailed description

The CapFlex-PIP© implant is a modular gliding surface proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint prosthesis. For implantation, there are two approaches available: The dorsal central split approach according to Swanson and the volar approach described by Simmen. Our experiences and data from our prospective registry indicate, that the active extension of the PIP joint is better after the dorsal approach, but sometimes related with hyperextension of the PIP joint and secondary swan-neck deformity. Extension is supposed to be better after the volar approach, but associated with active and passive extension lag. Evidence of theses experiences will assist the surgeon in the preoperative planning to select the appropriate approach according to the patient's needs. The primary objective is to investigate the active extension six months after implantation of the CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty, comparing the dorsal with the volar approach. This is a randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDorsal approach CapFlex arthroplasty

Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the dorsal approach.

PROCEDUREVolar approach CapFlex arthroplasty

Arthroplasty of the PIP joint with the CapFlex implant. Surgery will be done with the volar approach.

Sponsors

Miriam Marks
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty * Patient aged 18 years and over * Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion criteria

* Revision surgery * CapFlex-PIP© arthroplasty at the thumb IP joint * Major surgery at the same finger (e.g. DIP arthrodesis) * Ulnar/radial deviation of the PIP joint \> 15° * Patients in which a reconstruction of the collateral ligaments has to be performed * General medical contraindication to surgery * German language barrier to complete the questionnaires * Any disease process that would preclude accurate evaluation (e.g. neuromuscular, psychiatric or metabolic disorder) * Pregnancy * Surgery not planned by Dr. Herren, Dr. Schindele or Dr. Bodmer * Legal incompetence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Active extension of the PIP joint measured with a goniometer6 months after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective function using the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (briefMHQ)6 months after surgery

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026