Skip to content

Assessing the Impact of a Call Center Providing Standardized Pediatric Advice (PLATEL-EVAL)

Cluster-randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Impact of a Call Center Providing Standardized Pediatric Advices Based on the Number of Unscheduled and Medically Unjustified Consultations

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02885896
Acronym
PLATEL-EVAL
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-09-01
Start date
2021-10-31
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency Pediatric Care

Keywords

Call center, nurses, pediatrics, standardized messages, family counseling

Brief summary

In order to show that tailored pediatric counselling by telephone can reduce the number of unscheduled and medically unjustified physicians visits in emergency structures, a randomized controlled study is conducted. It compares the proportion of cases which used the emergency services or unscheduled consultation according to whether they received (or not) nurses' telephone advices from the platform. Indeed, our hypothesis is that the presence of nurses responding at the Reception and Control Calls Center inside the Emergency Medical Services (in french : Service d'Aide Médicale d'Urgence SAMU) - whose role is to deliver appropriate advice to people calling for benign pathologies they see as urgent and to answer questions following specific recommendations - will reduce the number of unplanned and medically unjustified consultations in medical emergency structures. This platform was set-up in order to show it may be a solution in response to the growing demand for pediatric care from the population, helping to reduce overcrowding in emergency care facilities. Indeed, promoting home care or only if necessary scheduled consultation reinforces the conduct to have when facing a pathology from their child. It will also help by reducing unjustified use of emergency structures, improving not only the users' reception conditions who actually require support in these structures with less waiting time, but also the working conditions for employees who perform there.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The inclusion criteria are different depending on the subject concerned, for reasons related to risk factors of pediatric diseases. They are audited by the regulator doctor (who has a fact sheet) and are controlled by the nurse of the platform. * For fever theme, a call is eligible if the child is older than 3 months and under 6 years old, and has had a fever for less than 48 hours. * For the theme diarrhea, a call is eligible if the child in question is aged from 12 months to 3 years, and has had diarrhea. Fever and vomiting are not

Exclusion criteria

. * For the theme breathing difficulty, a call is eligible if the child in question is aged from 3 months to 3 years, has experienced discomfort breathing and has shown no fever. Stuffy nose, runny nose and cough are not

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of unscheduled consultationsup to 7 days after inclusionThe main objective of the study is to compare the number of unscheduled consultations within 7 days following inclusion, i.e. the call at Centre15 (reception and regulation calls center) between the sample with access to telephone advice and the one who received the usual care (control group) . Our assumption is that the number of appeals for emergency medical services will be lower in the group that received advice from the platform than in the control group.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026