Skip to content

Tolerance and Efficiency of Paracetamol Subcutaneous Injection

Tolerance and Efficiency of Paracetamol bu Subcutaneous Releasing in Patients Hospitalized Into Palliative Care

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02884609
Acronym
TEPASC
Enrollment
160
Registered
2016-08-31
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerance and the efficiency of subcutaneous administration of Paracetamol for patients in palliative care.

Detailed description

Subcutaneous administration is the most commonly used way for palliative care and geriatric service. A lot of drugs are recommended with subcutaneous administration, but their use is performed out of the Marketing Authorization, and fewer data exist about this practice in literature. Paracetamol is a grade 1 analgesic not currently recommended for subcutaneous injection, because of the lack of validated references. However this kind of administration is usually performed for Paracetamol in the French palliative care services related with its advantages for patients, as analgesic or antipyretic. The assumption of the study is that the use of paracetamol subcutaneously is possible with a good tolerance for hospitalized patients in palliative care service.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* older than 18 years old * indication of paracetamol by subcutaneous injection, as an analgesic or an antipyretic

Exclusion criteria

* opposition to gather data patient * subcutaneous administration of paracetamol during the last week before the inclusion of the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of the severe or not adverse effects on the injection site8 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
as antipyretic, a feedback of tympanic temperature below 38°C during the two hours after injection8 days
as analgesic, the decrease of pain (decrease of 30 in the numerical scale score, or a Algo+ scale score lower than 2/5)8 days

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026