Skip to content

Formal vs. Home-Based Physical Therapy After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Formal vs. Home-Based Physical Therapy After Unicompartmental Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02883998
Enrollment
52
Registered
2016-08-30
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

home-based physical therapy, outpatient physical therapy, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, PT (Physical Therapy), osteoarthritis

Brief summary

To determine whether home-based physical therapy (HBPT) is not clinically inferior to formal outpatient physical therapy (OPT) after hospital discharge of patients undergoing a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Detailed description

Given that current practice trends are requiring treatments to be both clinically and cost effective, research has begun to focus on evaluating the effect of specific interventions. Many surgeon and patients have believed formal OPT is necessary to optimize functional outcomes following orthopaedic procedures. However, the literature has begun to call into question the need for OPT following total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy, and rotator cuff repair. A randomized controlled trial was done to compare face-to-face rehabilitation with in-home telerehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty. Utilizing the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as the primary outcome, the authors demonstrated noninferiority of telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face rehabilitation. Other secondary outcomes of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion, and isometric strength did not exhibit a difference between the treatment groups. (see citation below) Based on these findings, it appears that the high cost of formal OPT doesn't translate into a meaningful improvement of functional outcome. Because patient's undergoing UKA have a higher pre-operative functional status than patients having a TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty), it is reasonable to think that patients following a UKA are better equipped to succeed with HBPT. As a result, the hypothesis of the current study is that HBPT will prove to be non-inferior to formal OPT in the setting of UKA.

Interventions

OTHEROutpatient Physical Therapy

traditional outpatient physical therapy which occurs at a physical therapy office

OTHERHome Base Physical Therapy

Patients will be provided a packet of exercises via a website which allows access to instructional physical therapy videos specifically designated for UKA patients and equipment to perform the home based physical therapy

Sponsors

Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
CollaboratorOTHER
Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Require inpatient physical therapy beyond post-operative day one * \< 18 years old * Decline to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in Knee Society Scoreat 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery
Change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Indexat 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery
Change from baseline in Knee range of motionat 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComplicationsWill be assessed at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgeryDeep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolus Return to the OR within 30 days Re-admission within 30 days Superficial infection Deep infection Periprosthetic fracture Knee stiffness (defined as \< 90 degrees flexion at 3 weeks post-operative or \< 110 degrees flexion at 6 weeks post-operative)
Cost comparisonWill be assessed at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026