Skip to content

Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Atezolizumab Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Stage II-III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel, With or Without Atezolizumab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02883062
Enrollment
67
Registered
2016-08-30
Start date
2017-08-02
Completion date
2026-09-11
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive Breast Carcinoma, Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies how well carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab before surgery works in treating patients with newly diagnosed, stage II-III triple negative breast cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as atezolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To test the hypothesis that the combination of chemotherapy and atezolizumab will increase tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) percentage compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. II. To test the hypothesis that the combination of chemotherapy and atezolizumab will increase the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the safety of the treatment combination of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate potential biomarkers of response to chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC. II. To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab on the immune response in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC. III. To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab on neoantigen-specific T cell responses in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC. IV. To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab on long-term clinical endpoints such as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive carboplatin intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and paclitaxel IV over 1 hour once weekly (QW). Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive atezolizumab IV over 30-60 minutes and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes Q3W, and paclitaxel IV over 1 hour QW. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In both arms, within 3-6 weeks, patients undergo mastectomy or lumpectomy. Patients also undergo the collection of blood samples throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 months and 1 year.

Interventions

DRUGAtezolizumab

Given IV

PROCEDUREBiospecimen Collection

Undergo collection of blood samples

DRUGCarboplatin

Given IV

PROCEDURELumpectomy

Undergo lumpectomy

PROCEDUREMastectomy

Undergo mastectomy

DRUGPaclitaxel

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have histologically confirmed new diagnosis of breast cancer * Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) \< Allred score of 3 or =\< 5% positive staining cells in the invasive component of the tumor (provided the patient is being treated as triple negative breast cancer) * Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining 0 or 1+ according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines * Clinical stage T2-T4c, any N, M0 primary tumor by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition clinical staging * Eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy * No prior therapy for this disease * Age \>= 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 2 (Karnofsky \>= 60%) * Leukocytes \>= 2,500/mcL * Absolute neutrophil count \>= 1,500/mcL * Platelets \>= 150,000/mcL * Hemoglobin \>= 10 g/dL * Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) (however, patients with known Gilbert disease who have serum bilirubin level =\< 3 x ULN may be enrolled) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\]) =\< 3 x ULN * Alkaline phosphatase =\< 2.5 x ULN * Creatinine clearance \>= 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 by Cockcroft-Gault * International normalized ratio (INR) =\< 1.5 x ULN (this applies only to patients who do not receive therapeutic anticoagulation; patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, such as low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin, should be on a stable dose) * Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPPT) =\< 1.5 x ULN (this applies only to patients who do not receive therapeutic anticoagulation; patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, such as low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin, should be on a stable dose) * Administration of atezolizumab may have an adverse effect on pregnancy and poses a risk to the human fetus, including embryo-lethality; women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for 180 days after the last dose of paclitaxel; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Known metastatic disease * Invasive cancer in the contralateral breast * Patients with a previous history of non-breast malignancy are eligible only if they meet the following criteria for a cancer survivor: (1), and (2) * Has undergone potentially curative therapy for all prior malignancies * Has been considered disease-free for at least 1 year (with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix) * Patients with prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or prior solid organ transplantation * Treatment with any other investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1 * Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications (including, but not limited to, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor \[anti-TNF\] agents) within 2 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1 * Patients who have received acute, low dose, systemic immunosuppressant medications (e.g., a one-time dose of dexamethasone for nausea) may be enrolled * The use of inhaled corticosteroids and mineralocorticoids (e.g., fludrocortisone) for patients with orthostatic hypotension or adrenocortical insufficiency is allowed * Patients taking bisphosphonate therapy for symptomatic hypercalcemia; use of bisphosphonate therapy for other reasons (e.g., osteoporosis) is allowed * Known hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary cell products or other recombinant human antibodies * History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to other agents used in study * Known clinically significant liver disease, including active viral, alcoholic, or other hepatitis; cirrhosis; fatty liver; and inherited liver disease * Patients with past or resolved hepatitis B infection (defined as having a negative hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] test and a positive anti-HBc \[antibody to hepatitis B core antigen\] antibody test) are eligible * Patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is negative for HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) * History or risk of autoimmune disease, including, but not limited to, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, vascular thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid syndrome, Wegener's granulomatosis, Sjogren's syndrome, Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune thyroid disease, vasculitis, or glomerulonephritis * Patients with a history of autoimmune hypothyroidism on a stable dose of thyroid replacement hormone may be eligible * Patients with controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus on a stable insulin regimen may be eligible * Patients with eczema, psoriasis, lichen simplex chronicus of vitiligo with dermatologic manifestations only (e.g., patients with psoriatic arthritis would be excluded) are permitted provided that they meet the following conditions: * Patients with psoriasis must have a baseline ophthalmologic exam to rule out ocular manifestations * Rash must cover less than 10% of body surface area (BSA) * Disease is well controlled at baseline and only requiring low potency topical steroids (e.g., hydrocortisone 2.5%, hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1%, fluocinolone 0.01%, desonide 0.05%, alclometasone dipropionate 0.05%) * No acute exacerbations of underlying condition within the last 12 months (not requiring psoralen plus ultraviolet A radiation \[PUVA\], methotrexate, retinoids, biologic agents, oral calcineurin inhibitors; high potency or oral steroids) * History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonitis (including drug induced), organizing pneumonia (i.e., bronchiolitis obliterans, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, etc.), or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest computed tomography (CT) scan; history of radiation pneumonitis in the radiation field (fibrosis) is permitted * Patients with active tuberculosis (TB) are excluded * Severe infections within 4 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1, including, but not limited to, hospitalization for complications of infection, bacteremia, or severe pneumonia * Signs or symptoms of infection within 2 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1 * Received oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1; patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics (e.g., for prevention of a urinary tract infection or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are eligible * Major surgical procedure within 28 days prior to cycle 1, day 1 or anticipation of need for a major surgical procedure during the course of the study with the exception of the planned breast cancer surgery that is part of the trial design * Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before cycle 1, day 1 or anticipation that such a live, attenuated vaccine will be required during the study and up to 5 months after the last dose of atezolizumab * Influenza vaccination should be given during influenza season only (approximately October to March); patients must not receive live, attenuated influenza vaccine within 4 weeks prior to cycle 1, day 1 or at any time during the study * Patients requiring treatment with a RANKL inhibitor (e.g. denosumab) who cannot discontinue it before treatment with atezolizumab * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia (including symptomatic sinus bradycardia), or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are NOT excluded from this study, but HIV-positive patients must have: * A stable regimen of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) * No requirement for concurrent antibiotics or antifungal agents for the prevention of opportunistic infections * A CD4 count above 250 cells/mcL and an undetectable HIV viral load on standard PCR-based tests * Pregnant women are excluded from this study because atezolizumab is an agent with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects; because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with atezolizumab, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with atezolizumab; these potential risks may also apply to other agents used in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) PercentageBaseline and between days 18-22 following completion of cycle 1 (each cycle is 3 weeks)Will be measured by histopathologic assay. The TIL percentage after initiation of therapy will be compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (Arm A), and patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab (Arm B). The post-treatment TIL percentages between two arms will be summarized using descriptive statistics at each time point.
Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) RateAt the time of surgery (3-6 weeks after last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be up to 12 weeks in length)* Pathologic complete response rates will be summarized using contingency tables and compared using Fisher's exact test between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (Arm A), and patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab (Arm B). * A pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as no histology evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and sentinel or axillary lymph nodes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantFrom start of treatment of through completion of AE follow-up (median length of follow-up 2.98 months, full range 0.26-6.56 months)Adverse events were classified and graded using CTCAE version 5.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neoantigen-specific T Cell ResponseUp to 1 yearThe frequency and function of neoantigen-specific T cell across the two arms in the peripheral blood at each time point will be summarized using tools for high throughput analysis. The differences of temporal changes in neoantigen-specific T cell between treatment groups (Arm A versus Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed using mixed models, followed by ad-hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Incidence of Potential Biomarkers of ResponseUp to the time of surgeryPotential biomarkers include baseline TIL percentage, baseline PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor infiltrating immune cells, baseline immune signature, and baseline neoantigen load. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models will be used to evaluate predictive ability of these baseline biomarkers on the response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab therapy. To take full advantage of such a randomized design, each model will also include the interaction term between treatment assignment and the baseline biomarker. This allows not only to answer the question whether the biomarker is predictive of pCR, but also whether the predictive ability is the same across two arms. The predictive ability will also be summarized using the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), and the 95% confidence intervals of AUC will be obtained using bootstrap resampling methods.
Disease Free Survival (DFS)Time from randomization to disease recurrence or death due to any causes, assessed up to 1 yearThe distribution of DFS in the two treatment arms will be described using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods and compared by log-rank tests.
Overall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death due to any causes, assessed up to 1 yearThe distribution of OS in the two treatment arms will be described using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods and compared by log-rank tests.
Change in Immune Response by Immune SignatureUp to the time of surgeryThe immune signature and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells will be evaluated at baseline, after initiation of therapy (day 18-22), and at the time of surgery. The temporal changes of immune signature and PD-L1 expression in each arm will be summarized using contingency tables or descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, medians, etc.) as appropriate. The differences of temporal change between treatment groups (Arm A versus \[vs.\] Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed musing mixed model (PD-L1 expression) or generalized linear mixed model (immune signatures).
Change in Immune Response PD-L1 ExpressionUp to the time of surgeryThe immune signature and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells will be evaluated at baseline, after initiation of therapy (day 18-22), and at the time of surgery. The temporal changes of immune signature and PD-L1 expression in each arm will be summarized using contingency tables or descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, medians, etc.) as appropriate. The differences of temporal change between treatment groups (Arm A vs. Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed musing mixed model (PD-L1 expression) or generalized linear mixed model (immune signatures).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)
Patients receive carboplatin IV over 30 minutes Q3W and paclitaxel IV over 1 hour QW. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo the collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
22
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)
Patients receive atezolizumab IV over 30-60 minutes and carboplatin IV over 30 minutes Q3W, and paclitaxel IV over 1 hour QW. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo the collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
45
Total67

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Total
Age, Continuous54 years49 years52 years
Baseline PD-L1 status
Negative
5 Participants19 Participants24 Participants
Baseline PD-L1 status
Positive
4 Participants16 Participants20 Participants
Baseline PD-L1 status
Unknown
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Clinical Stage
Clinical Stage II
14 Participants31 Participants45 Participants
Clinical Stage
Clinical Stage III
8 Participants14 Participants22 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0
21 Participants41 Participants62 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants42 Participants64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Germline BRCA status
Mutant
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Germline BRCA status
Unknown
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Germline BRCA status
Wild type
13 Participants34 Participants47 Participants
Menopausal status
Postmenopausal
14 Participants24 Participants38 Participants
Menopausal status
Premenopausal
5 Participants20 Participants25 Participants
Menopausal status
Unknown
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Nodal Involvement
Negative
9 Participants24 Participants33 Participants
Nodal Involvement
Positive
11 Participants21 Participants32 Participants
Nodal Involvement
Unknown
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants11 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants27 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants45 participants67 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants45 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 221 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 1845 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1810 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) Percentage

Will be measured by histopathologic assay. The TIL percentage after initiation of therapy will be compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (Arm A), and patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab (Arm B). The post-treatment TIL percentages between two arms will be summarized using descriptive statistics at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline and between days 18-22 following completion of cycle 1 (each cycle is 3 weeks)

Population: 6 participants in Arm A were excluded. 4 of those participants withdrew consent and did not receive treatment. 2 patients did receive treatment but withdrew consent during treatment. This outcome measure is based on a modified intent-to-treat analysis (mITT). The remaining 3 participants in Arm A and 21 participants in Arm B were not evaluable because their tissue could not be evaluated or because they did not have paired samples.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) PercentageBaseline16.7 percentage of TIL
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) PercentageDays 18-22 following completion of cycle 118.3 percentage of TIL
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) PercentageDays 18-22 following completion of cycle 121.7 percentage of TIL
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Change in Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) PercentageBaseline17.5 percentage of TIL
p-value: 0.36Generalized estimating equation (GEE)
Primary

Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate

* Pathologic complete response rates will be summarized using contingency tables and compared using Fisher's exact test between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (Arm A), and patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab (Arm B). * A pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as no histology evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and sentinel or axillary lymph nodes.

Time frame: At the time of surgery (3-6 weeks after last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be up to 12 weeks in length)

Population: 6 participants in Arm A were excluded. 4 of those participants withdrew consent and did not receive treatment. 2 patients did receive treatment but withdrew consent during treatment. This outcome measure is based on a modified intent-to-treat analysis (mITT).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate3 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate25 Participants
p-value: 0.018Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by Participant

Adverse events were classified and graded using CTCAE version 5.

Time frame: From start of treatment of through completion of AE follow-up (median length of follow-up 2.98 months, full range 0.26-6.56 months)

Population: 4 participants in Arm A were excluded. 4 of those participants withdrew consent and did not receive treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAnemia2 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantRash2 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAnorectal infection0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantArthralgia1 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantScleral disorder0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantGastroesophageal reflux disease0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantGlucose intolerance0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSepsis0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantEye inflammation1 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSkin abscess0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypocalcemia1 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypokalemia0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSyncope1 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantNausea0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAST increase0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantNeutropenia7 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypertension0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantThrombocytopenia1 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantALT increase0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantVomiting0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantDiarrhea0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantLeukopenia0 Participants
Arm A (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAdrenal insufficiency0 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantLeukopenia1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantArthralgia0 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantDiarrhea1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypokalemia1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantThrombocytopenia0 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantRash1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantScleral disorder1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSkin abscess2 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSyncope1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAdrenal insufficiency1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantALT increase2 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAnemia8 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAnorectal infection1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantAST increase1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantGastroesophageal reflux disease1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantGlucose intolerance1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantEye inflammation0 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypocalcemia0 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantHypertension1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantNausea1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantNeutropenia15 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantSepsis1 Participants
Arm B (Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Breast Surgery)Safety of the Treatment Regimen as Measured by the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events Experienced by ParticipantVomiting1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change in Immune Response by Immune Signature

The immune signature and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells will be evaluated at baseline, after initiation of therapy (day 18-22), and at the time of surgery. The temporal changes of immune signature and PD-L1 expression in each arm will be summarized using contingency tables or descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, medians, etc.) as appropriate. The differences of temporal change between treatment groups (Arm A versus \[vs.\] Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed musing mixed model (PD-L1 expression) or generalized linear mixed model (immune signatures).

Time frame: Up to the time of surgery

Other Pre-specified

Change in Immune Response PD-L1 Expression

The immune signature and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells will be evaluated at baseline, after initiation of therapy (day 18-22), and at the time of surgery. The temporal changes of immune signature and PD-L1 expression in each arm will be summarized using contingency tables or descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, medians, etc.) as appropriate. The differences of temporal change between treatment groups (Arm A vs. Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed musing mixed model (PD-L1 expression) or generalized linear mixed model (immune signatures).

Time frame: Up to the time of surgery

Other Pre-specified

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

The distribution of DFS in the two treatment arms will be described using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods and compared by log-rank tests.

Time frame: Time from randomization to disease recurrence or death due to any causes, assessed up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Potential Biomarkers of Response

Potential biomarkers include baseline TIL percentage, baseline PD-L1 expression in the tumor and tumor infiltrating immune cells, baseline immune signature, and baseline neoantigen load. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models will be used to evaluate predictive ability of these baseline biomarkers on the response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab therapy. To take full advantage of such a randomized design, each model will also include the interaction term between treatment assignment and the baseline biomarker. This allows not only to answer the question whether the biomarker is predictive of pCR, but also whether the predictive ability is the same across two arms. The predictive ability will also be summarized using the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), and the 95% confidence intervals of AUC will be obtained using bootstrap resampling methods.

Time frame: Up to the time of surgery

Other Pre-specified

Neoantigen-specific T Cell Response

The frequency and function of neoantigen-specific T cell across the two arms in the peripheral blood at each time point will be summarized using tools for high throughput analysis. The differences of temporal changes in neoantigen-specific T cell between treatment groups (Arm A versus Arm B) or their association with clinical outcome (pCR vs. non-pCR) will also be assessed using mixed models, followed by ad-hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Overall Survival (OS)

The distribution of OS in the two treatment arms will be described using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods and compared by log-rank tests.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death due to any causes, assessed up to 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026