Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation

Dex vs Dazzle: Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02878837
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-08-25
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2017-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failed Moderate Sedation During Procedure, Minimally Conscious State

Brief summary

This randomized, open clinical trial sought to compare the use of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine during surgery in patients under regional anesthesia. The primary objective was to determine the superiority of either drug during the intraoperative period regarding: 1- Depth of sedation and 2- incidence of complications. Secondary objectives included the determination of superiority regarding the postoperative period. For that, patients were randomized into two groups and sedated with either Midazolam or Dexmedetomidine.

Detailed description

This study was a randomized, open clinical trial. Patients undergoing surgery under regional (neuraxial or brachial plexus block) anesthesia were randomly assigned into one of two groups. Patients in one of the groups (called MDZ) were initially sedated with a 0.05mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam. The ones in the other group (called DEX) were initially sedated with a loading dose of 1 µg/Kg of Dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at 0.2 to 0.8 µg/Kg/h. In order to achieve a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and -1, the following breakthrough doses were used as necessary: MDZ: 0.02 mg/Kg bolus dose of Midazolam plus 0.5µg/Kg bolus dose of Fentanyl DEX: 0.5µg/Kg bolus dose of Fentanyl Depth of sedation and incidence of complications were recorded during surgery, in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and in the Ward for two days following surgery,

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine
DRUGMidazolam

Sponsors

Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of any Bradyarrhythmia; * New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classes III and IV Heart Failure and/or Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction under 30%; * Respiratory Failure, Glasgow Coma Scale score 8 or under, and Liver Failure - due to the increased risk of sedation in patients with these conditions (d) refusal to participate in the study or withdrawal of consent at any moment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depth of SedationIntraoperativeNumber of breakthrough doses necessary to achieve RASS score between -3 and -1
Respiratory depressionIntraoperativeUse of supplemental oxygen flow greater than 2L/min or endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation
BradycardiaIntraoperativeHeart Rate \< 50 heartbeats per minute
HypotensionIntraoperativeMean Arterial Pressure \< 55mmHg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual SedationUp to 2 hours after surgeryRASS score \< -1 in Post Anesthesia Care Unit
Delirium2 daysIncidence of Delirium according to CAM-ICU algorithm
ShiveringUp to 2 hours after end of surgerySelf-described by the patient
Length of Hospital StayUntil Discharge, up to 30 daysLength of time between surgery and discharge from Hospital, in days
Pain2 daysPain, described by the patient, according to the Analog Scale. Necessity of breakthrough doses of analgesics.
Quality of Sleep2 daysSelf-described.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026