Skip to content

Segmental Epidural Anesthesia (SEA) V/S General Anesthesia for PCNL

Comparative Evaluation of General Anesthesia (SEA) Using 0.5% Bupivacaine and Segmental Epidural Anesthesia (GA) for Percutaneous Nephro Lithotomy - A Retrospective Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02878512
Acronym
AnesthesiaPCNL
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-08-25
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2016-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain, Success Rate Under Segmental Epidural

Keywords

Segmental Epidural, Regional Anesthesia for PCNL

Brief summary

Management of nephrolithiasis has been revolutionized by the advent of shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique and is used for the fragmentation and removal of stones of size more than 20 to 30 mm, staghorn stones or multiple stones resistant to ESWL. Anaesthesia for PCNL is a challenge because of the disease, surgical procedure, positioning, hypothermia,and the possibility of fluid absorption, dilutional anaemia and blood loss. General anaesthesia is the gold standard for this surgery.The advent of new drugs has refined the technique of general anaesthesia. However there are several issues related to prone position still to be addressed like accidental extubation and difficult reintubation, nerve injuries and post operative respiratory complications. Combined spinal epidural(CSE) and only epidural anaesthesia (EA) is a well established technique of anaesthesia for upper abdomen and lower thoracic surgeries. It use has also been reported in PCNL surgeries.Segmental epidural can selectively blocks pain fibres from the surgical site. This not only allows to limit the dose of the local anaesthetics, but also limit motor and sympathetic blockade. Selective sympathetic block is associated with respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and metabolic benefits. This formed the basis of our current study. In the present study the investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of segmental epidural for PCNL and compared it with standard technique i.e. GA.

Detailed description

To evaluate efficacy the investigators compared intraoperative haemodynamics, surgical clearance of stones, post operative pain, surgeon's and Patient's satisfaction scores and postoperative complications and side effects in 60 ASA I and II patients undergoing PCNL surgery who received either General anesthesia or Segmental epidural Anesthesia.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPCNL under General Anesthesia

Patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy received General anesthesia.

PROCEDURESegmental Epidural Anesthesia

Patients undergoing PCNL surgery received Segmental epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine.

Sponsors

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I/II * Age - 18 years to 60 years * Either sex * BMI \< 30

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling for consent * ASA 3 * Obesity with BMI \> 30. * Contraindications for Epidural Anaesthesia * Undilated pelvicalyceal system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemodynamic parameters: Change in heart rate per minute from baselineEvery 15 minutes for 2 hours and then every hourly till 24 hoursChange in heart rate per minute from baseline
Postoperative Pain using VASPostoperatively every hourly for 24 hoursPost operative pain was studied using VAS
Hemodynamic parameters; change in Mean arterial pressures in mm Hg from baselineHemodynamic parameters Change in Mean Arterial Pressure in mm Hg Every 15 minutes for 2 hours and then every hourly till 24 hourschange in mean arterial pressure from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgeon satisfaction score10 minutes Postoperative(0-extremely poor, 1-poor, 2-fair, 3-good, 4-excellent).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026