Skip to content

Fast Versus Slow Application of Vulsellum During Intrauterine Device Insertion

the Effect of Slow Versus Fast Application of Vulsellum on Pain Perception During Intrauterine Device Insertion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02878135
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-08-25
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Improving Quality of Life

Brief summary

intrauterine device insertion requires use a vulsellum to stabilize the cervix. Patient's often complain that its placement is one of the most uncomfortable parts of this procedure

Interventions

PROCEDUREfast application
PROCEDUREslow application

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women not taken analgesics or anxiolytics in the 24 hours prior insertion * Women not taken misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion * Women who will accept to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Any contraindication to intrauterine device placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mean Pain score with vulsellum placement5 minutes

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026