Ischemia, Oxygen Deficiency
Conditions
Keywords
chronic gastro-intestinal ischemia, oxygen deficiency of the gastro-intestinal tract
Brief summary
To determine the difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post-prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI.
Detailed description
The diagnosis of chronic gastro-intestinal ischemia (CGI) remains a clinical challenge because this diagnosis is difficult to distinguish by the frequent incidence of chronic abdominal pain and asymptomatic stenosis of the mesenteric arteries1. The standard diagnostic work up includes medical history, anamnesis and physical examination, radiological imaging and a functional test as visible light spectroscopy (VLS)2-4 or tonometry5-7. A multidisciplinary team consisting of a gastroenterologist, a vascular surgeon and an interventional radiologist, all specialized in CGI, discusses all patients which results in an expert based consensus diagnosis. Currently, there is no specific test to diagnose CGI. In literature, Magnetic Resonance (MR) techniques are described by which the flow in the mesenteric vessels is measured pre- and post-prandial in healthy volunteers and CGI patients8-12. The flow in the mesenteric vessels increases post-prandial (hyperemia). However, this increase in post-prandial flow compared to pre-prandial appeared less in CGI patients compared to the healthy volunteers. In some CGI patients, even a decrease of the post-prandial compared to pre-prandial flow was seen. We might be able to distinguish patients with CGI from patients without CGI with MR flow measurements with food stimulation.
Interventions
To determine the difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients suspected of CGI referred to our hospital for further analysis 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Patients who gave informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Age \< 18 years 2. Unable to give informed consent 3. Pregnancy 4. Contra-indications for MRI: a. Metal implants which cannot be removed. E.g. cardiac pacemakers/ICD, aneurysm clips, metal stents, artificial heart valve, cochlea/retinal implants, hearing aids, dentures with magnetic click system or with other metal accessories, tattoos with metallic dye, metal plates/pins/screws of bones, piercings b. Claustrophobia c. Inability to lie still for 1 hour to 1,5 hours 5. Other criteria the physician considers are not compatible with this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determination of difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow | 2.5 years | The difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI (mL/min/kg) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wich vessel or combination of vessels differentiate best | 2.5 years | Which vessel or which combination of vessels best differentiates between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI by MR flow measurement by computing sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and negative predictive value. |
| The severity of abdominal pain | 20/30/40 minutes | The severity of abdominal pain in course of time after stimulation with nutritional drink, using the Numeric Pain Intensity scale at baseline and 20, 30 and 40 minutes after nutritional drink |
| Determination of difference in MR flow measurements before and after treatment for CGI | 2.5 years | The difference in MR flow measurements of the mesenteric vessels prior to and after treatment in patients diagnosed with CGI with persistent relief of symptoms after treatment (in (mL/min/kg) |
Countries
Netherlands