Skip to content

Magnetic Resonance Flow Measurements of Mesenteric Arteries and Veins and Portal Vein

Magnetic Resonance Flow Measurements of Mesenteric Arteries and Veins and Portal Vein With Food Stimulation in Patients Suspected of Chronic Gastro-intestinal Ischemia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02875600
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-08-23
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemia, Oxygen Deficiency

Keywords

chronic gastro-intestinal ischemia, oxygen deficiency of the gastro-intestinal tract

Brief summary

To determine the difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post-prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI.

Detailed description

The diagnosis of chronic gastro-intestinal ischemia (CGI) remains a clinical challenge because this diagnosis is difficult to distinguish by the frequent incidence of chronic abdominal pain and asymptomatic stenosis of the mesenteric arteries1. The standard diagnostic work up includes medical history, anamnesis and physical examination, radiological imaging and a functional test as visible light spectroscopy (VLS)2-4 or tonometry5-7. A multidisciplinary team consisting of a gastroenterologist, a vascular surgeon and an interventional radiologist, all specialized in CGI, discusses all patients which results in an expert based consensus diagnosis. Currently, there is no specific test to diagnose CGI. In literature, Magnetic Resonance (MR) techniques are described by which the flow in the mesenteric vessels is measured pre- and post-prandial in healthy volunteers and CGI patients8-12. The flow in the mesenteric vessels increases post-prandial (hyperemia). However, this increase in post-prandial flow compared to pre-prandial appeared less in CGI patients compared to the healthy volunteers. In some CGI patients, even a decrease of the post-prandial compared to pre-prandial flow was seen. We might be able to distinguish patients with CGI from patients without CGI with MR flow measurements with food stimulation.

Interventions

To determine the difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients suspected of CGI referred to our hospital for further analysis 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Patients who gave informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \< 18 years 2. Unable to give informed consent 3. Pregnancy 4. Contra-indications for MRI: a. Metal implants which cannot be removed. E.g. cardiac pacemakers/ICD, aneurysm clips, metal stents, artificial heart valve, cochlea/retinal implants, hearing aids, dentures with magnetic click system or with other metal accessories, tattoos with metallic dye, metal plates/pins/screws of bones, piercings b. Claustrophobia c. Inability to lie still for 1 hour to 1,5 hours 5. Other criteria the physician considers are not compatible with this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow2.5 yearsThe difference in baseline MR flow measurements and post prandial MR flow measurements between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI (mL/min/kg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wich vessel or combination of vessels differentiate best2.5 yearsWhich vessel or which combination of vessels best differentiates between patients diagnosed with CGI and patients not diagnosed with CGI by MR flow measurement by computing sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and negative predictive value.
The severity of abdominal pain20/30/40 minutesThe severity of abdominal pain in course of time after stimulation with nutritional drink, using the Numeric Pain Intensity scale at baseline and 20, 30 and 40 minutes after nutritional drink
Determination of difference in MR flow measurements before and after treatment for CGI2.5 yearsThe difference in MR flow measurements of the mesenteric vessels prior to and after treatment in patients diagnosed with CGI with persistent relief of symptoms after treatment (in (mL/min/kg)

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactLaurens Groenendijk
l.groenendijk@erasmusmc.nl31 10 7033612
Backup ContactLouisa Van Dijk, md

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026