Skip to content

High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus VNI in Acute Hypercapnic Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus VNI for Emergency Department Treatment of Acute Hypercapnic Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema With Respiratory Failure: a Multicenter Randomized Non Inferiority Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02874339
Acronym
OPTICAP
Enrollment
250
Registered
2016-08-22
Start date
2016-10-26
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2018-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema, Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

Acute cardiogenic pulmonary, Respiratory failure, Hypercapnia, High flow nasal oxygen, Non invasive ventilation, Emergency department

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is non inferior to non invasive ventilation (NIV) in the immediate treatment of patients with acute hypercapnic cardiogenic pulmonary edema associated with respiratory failure in the emergency department.

Detailed description

Prospective multicenter study including ED patients with a suspected diagnosis of acute hypercapnic pulmonary edema with respiratory failure who require NIV according to the joint recommendations from the French society of anaesthesia and intensive care and the French society for intensive care. Patients will be randomly assigned to NIV or high flow nasal oxygen therapy, with stratification on center and severity of hypercania. Assigned Treatment will be administered during at least one session of 1hr and resumed as needed based on the patient's signs of respiratory distress and blood gas results Repeat evaluation of arterial blood gases, clinical parameters and dyspnea will be performed before and after the first and second hour of treatment according to current recommendation from the French society of anesthesia and intensive care medicine (SFAR).

Interventions

In the optiflow group, oxygen will be administered through a heated humidifier (Airvo 2, Fisher and Paykel healthcare) and applied through large bore binasal prongs. Initial gas flow rate will be set at of 60 l/min and adjusted to 40-50 l/min based on patient's tolerance. FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain an SpO2 ≥ 92%. Initial temperature will be set at 37° and reduced according to patient's tolerance.

DEVICENon invasive ventilation

In the NIV group, NIV will be delivered through a face mask connected to a ventilator with pressure support applied in a noninvasive ventilation mode. The Pressure-support level will be adjusted to obtain an expired tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight and a respiratory rate of 25-30 b/min. PEEP (range 5-10 cm of water) and FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain an SpO2 ≥92% and to patient's comfort.

Sponsors

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Asuspected diagnosis of acute pulmonary edema presenting with any of the following criteria: * Dyspnea (orthopnea or a worsening of dyspnea according to NYHA criteria)-Respiratory rate \>20 b/min * Bilateral crepitant rales at pulmonary auscultation * Pulmonary infiltrate on chest X-ray * Signs of respiratory failure or any of the following clinical, laboratory or or radiology signs: * Use of accessory respiratory muscles * Paradoxical abdominal movement * Cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio \>0.5) * Hypertensive crisis * PaO2/FiO2 \<= 300 mmHg breathing O2\> 8L/min or PaO2 \<= 63mmHg breathing room air. * Hypercapnia (PaCO2\>45)

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic respiratory disease or associated dyspnea from non cardiac origin, * Fever (\>38,5°), sepsis or ongoing infection, * Contra-indication to NIV, * Treatment with NIV or CPAP prior to inclusion, including prehospital treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with a normalized PaCO21hr of treatment(PaCO2 equal or lower than 45 mmHg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient's dypnea1hrDyspnea will be assessed by the emergency physician based on patient's use of accessory respiratory muscles, and measured using a 5-point likert scale. Dyspnea score will be recorded by the patient using a Modified Borg scale for dyspnea
Patient's comfort1hrComfort score will be recorded by the patient using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 for comfort
Endotracheal intubation7 day and 1 month follow up
Mortality7 day and 1 month follow up
Blood gas parameters1hrBlood gas parameters will be measured from standard laboratory arterial blood gas analysis

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactMustapha Sebbane, MD, PhD
m-sebbane@chu-montpellier.fr0033(4)67337974

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026