Skip to content

Efficacy of Heat-shock Protein (HSP) Inhibitors in Myeloproliferative Syndromes (MPS)

Efficacy of Heat-shock Protein (HSP) Inhibitors in Myeloproliferative Syndromes (MPS): Fundamental Observational in Vitro Study Using Samples From a Collection

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02873832
Acronym
HSP-SMP
Enrollment
37
Registered
2016-08-22
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myeloproliferative Syndrome

Brief summary

Heat-shock proteins (HSP) have been very highly conserved throughout the evolution of species and are characterized by their chaperone function, thanks to their ability to prevent aggregation and to promote the renaturation/break down of damaged proteins. Among other targets, they also chaperone JAK2, a key step that is deregulated in signalling in myeloproliferative syndromes (MPS) because of the JAK2V617F mutation. These HSP also have a potent cytoprotective action through their multiples inhibiting effects on apoptotic processes. Little is known about levels of HSP expression, in particular for HSP70 and HSP27, in MPS cells. However, in vitro studies of different cell models have shown the interest of HSP90 inhibitors in slowing cell proliferation in MPS. These results have been confirmed in animal models with results in terms of blood counts and overall survival. In addition, it seems that the V617F mutated form of JAK2 is more sensitive than the wild-type to HSP90 inhibitors. Finally, inhibitors of HSP90 remain efficacious with regard to the inhibition of cell growth, even in cases of resistance to JAK2 inhibitors. Nonetheless, HSP90 inhibitors are known to stimulate the expression of other HSP, notably HSP27 and HSP70, which are, through their properties, tumorigenic and could lead to an escape phenomenon. Thus the combined use of several HSP inhibitors could be beneficial, and eventually present synergistic effects on the inhibition of tumour processes.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBlood sample
OTHERFlow cytometry

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

MPS Patients: * Patients with MPS * Patients who have been informed and not objected to the tests * Patients over 18 years old * Patients whose samples have been preserved at the CRB in the Haemopathies collection Control patients: * Patients over 18 years old * Pregnant patients * Patients who have been informed and not objected to the collection of their cord blood after the delivery

Exclusion criteria

* Adults under guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the level of expression of HSP (HSP90, HSP70, HSP27) between cells from a collection of samples of patients with myeloproliferative disease and healthy controls .through study completion, an average of 1 yearLevel of protein expression using flow cytometry and western blot

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cell death after in vitro treatment with different HSP inhibitorsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026