Skip to content

Local Heat-Stress as a Mechanism of Hearing Preservation

Local Heat-Stress as a Mechanism of Hearing Preservation in Adults Treated With Cisplatin: A Pilot Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02872844
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-08-19
Start date
2016-11-03
Completion date
2018-12-13
Last updated
2023-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

This pilot study plans to determine whether or not local heat-stress as a mechanism can help to preserve hearing in adults treated with Cisplatin.

Detailed description

Evidence from the laboratory over the past 10-15 years has demonstrated that heat stress to the ear is otoprotectant against a variety of insults. The strongest evidence supports heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70) as a key facilitator in this protection. Hsp70 is well established as a cell stabilizer, especially for cells undergoing significant stress. Hsp70 has been shown to protect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Induction of Hsp70 may be accomplished pharmacologically, by whole-body heat stress, or by local heat stress. A form of local heat-stress is already employed in the common clinical setting of the warm caloric. This vestibular test has been in place since the early 20th century with a variety of studies evaluating the patient vestibular response to a variety of times and temperatures. Current clinical practice recommends either water or air calorics of 45°C or 50°C (respectively) at 45-60 seconds. Several studies have described administering prolonged caloric stimulation to individual subjects without ill effect. Patients are able to tolerate stimulation up to 60 minutes without intolerable nystagmus or vertiginous symptoms or significant injury. Thus, it is feasible to provide warm stimulus to the ear for the recommended time of 30 minutes at the recommended temperature of 50°C (air) without significant risk to the patient. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of heat stress to the inner ear as an otoprotectant intervention against cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Patients that meet inclusion criteria will be offered audiometric evaluation before each cisplatin treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following their chemotherapy. Patients will undergo their heat-stress 5-7 hours prior to their cisplatin treatment. Patients will serve as their own controls with one ear randomly receiving treatment and the other not. The primary outcome will be audiometric testing. Blood samples will be collected for serum levels of Hsp70 as a secondary outcome. A sample size of 12 achieves 80% power to detect a 0.9 standard deviation difference between ears using a two-sided paired t-test at 0.05 significance level.

Interventions

DEVICEICS AirCal3

Each patient will undergo a 30-minute heat stress to one ear. For randomization, the left ear will be treated in patients with a registration number ending with an odd number and the right for even numbers. An ICS AirCal3 Research Strategy (Otometrics) system attached to an Intel Core 15vPro Thinkpad (IBM) laptop is used within the audiometry department of a separate outpatient clinic. The patients will be reclined and the hot air caloric at 50°C applied by a licensed, unblinded audiologist for 30 minutes. The patients will be allowed to fixate and use whatever means they prefer for entertainment during the intervention.

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient undergoing total cisplatin in total doses \> 100mg/m2. * Written consent. * Age \> 19 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to tolerate the intervention * Exposure to cisplatin treatment without intervention. * Head and neck carcinoma * Baseline asymmetric hearing loss. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Audiometric EffectOne yearAudiometric evaluation will serve as the primary measure of outcome.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026