Skip to content

To Test for Photo Allergy Reaction of Sunscreens

A Randomized Study to Assess the Potential for Photoallergy of SPF 50 Y65 110, SPF 50 Y51 002 and SPF 15 V27 104 in Human Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02872220
Enrollment
56
Registered
2016-08-19
Start date
2015-03-23
Completion date
2015-05-08
Last updated
2018-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Photoallergy

Brief summary

The primary objective of this tudy was to evaluate the potential of photoallergy of of sun care products Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 50 Y65 110, SPF 50 Y51 002, and SPF 15 V27 104 application compared to that of a negative control (0.9% sodium chloride, NaCl) and followed by irradiation with UV A and UVB. The secondary objective aims for evaluation of the safety of SPF 50 Y65 110, SPF 50 Y51 002, and SPF 15 V27 104 combined with ultraviolet (UV) A/B irradiation by monitoring adverse events (AEs) throughout the study.

Interventions

Application of 200 µL in an occlusive patch of Webril (0.150 ± 0.010 mg) compared to that of a negative control (0.9% sodium chloride, NaCl) and followed by irradiation with UV A and UVB.

Application of 200 µL in an occlusive patch of Webril compared to that of a negative control (0.9% sodium chloride, NaCl) and followed by irradiation with UV A and UVB.

Application of 200 µL in an occlusive patch of Webril compared to that of a negative control (0.9% sodium chloride, NaCl) and followed by irradiation with UV A and UVB.

Negative control (200 µL, 0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]) after a single 24 h application of test materials followed by irradiation with ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB).

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women, aged 18 to 65 with good general health * Fitzpatrick skin type I IV * Females (of childbearing potential) on acceptable measure of contraception * Willing to follow study rules, which include: no sun exposure (for example, no swimming, sunbathing, or tanning beds), avoidance of activities that would cause excessive sweating, no use of lotions, creams, or oils on the back area * Willing to not change the current brand of personal care products such as soaps, body washes, laundry detergent, body sprays, body spritzes, etc. while participating in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of inflammatory responsesup to 3 weeksInflammatory responses (Based on scores): 0 = No visible reaction + = Slight, confluent, or patchy erythema 1 = Mild erythema (pink) 2 = Moderate erythema (definite redness) 3 = Strong erythema (very intense redness)
Evaluation of superficial effectsup to 3 weeksSuperficial effects: g = Glazing y = Peeling c = Scab, dried film of serous exudate of vesicular or bulla reaction d = Hyperpigmentation (reddish brown discoloration of test site) h = Hypopigmentation (loss of visible pigmentation at test site) f = Fissuring grooves in the superficial layers of the skin

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adverse event collection as a measure of safety and tolerabilityup to 3 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026