Skip to content

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Oral Versus Intravenous Hydration as a Preventive Measure of Contrast-induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Patients With Renal Insufficiency (RI) Grade III Under Study Conducting Computed Tomography (CT)

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Oral Versus Intravenous Hydration as a Preventive Measure of Contrast-induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02872155
Acronym
NICIR
Enrollment
264
Registered
2016-08-19
Start date
2017-07-04
Completion date
2019-07-15
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency

Keywords

contrast-induced nephropathy, renal insufficiency, computed tomography

Brief summary

This study evaluates if oral hydratation is as effective as endovenous hydratation in the prophylaxis of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients renal insufficiency grade III under study conducting contrasted computed tomography.

Interventions

OTHEROral hydratation

500 mL of water two hours before computed tomography and 2000 milliliters 24 hours after performing computed tomography

DRUGBicarbonate endovenous hydratation

Intravenous hydration: sodium (1.6 molar) Bicarbonate 3 mL / kg / h starting one hour before the computed tomography and sodium bicarbonate (1/6 M) 1 mL / kg / h during the hour after computed tomography.

DRUGSaline endovenous hydratation

If there is contraindication for administration of bicarbonate the pattern of intravenous hydration is performed with saline solution: 3 ml / kg / h for 1 hour before the procedure and normal saline 1 mL / kg / hour for hour after computed tomography.

Sponsors

Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
CollaboratorOTHER
David Garcia Cinca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of both sexes over 18 years * Candidates for a study with computed tomography and intravenous contrast * A glomerular filtration rate between 30 and 45 mL / min including both determinations * They have signed the written informed consent after being informed of the objectives and the nature of the case or be unable to have the authorization or agreement of its

Exclusion criteria

* refuse to participate in the study * pregnancy or lactation * Other risk factors for Contrast Induced Nephropathy: diabetes mellitus type I, have an age of 75 years or above, heart failure (defined by a scale New York Heart Association 3 or 4), hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure \<100), being treated with nephrotoxic medications. * Any disease or a history that, in the investigator's opinion, could confound the results of the study or pose an additional risk to patient treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of contrast induced nephropathy48-72 hours after the completion of the computed tomographyContrast induced nephropathy defined as a creatinine increase\> 0.5 mg / dl comparing the initial blood test to the blood test performed after 48-72 hours to the completion of the computed tomography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for hemodialysis15 daysNeed for hemodialysis for one month after completion of the computed tomography, among patients who have undergone oral or intravenous hydration
Reversibility of contrast induced nephropathy15 daysDefined as no increase in creatinine\> 0.5 mg / dl compared to the initial analysis performed
Proportion of adverse events15 daysPresence of adverse events, grade 3 adverse events and serious adverse events related to the investigational products during the study follow-up

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026