Skip to content

Stress Index to Individualize Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS

Right-Sizing Tidal Volume in ARDS: Using the Stress Index to Optimize Mechanical Ventilation to Individual Respiratory Mechanics

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02871102
Enrollment
4
Registered
2016-08-18
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

mechanical ventilation, respiratory mechanics, acute respiratory distress syndrome, positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume

Brief summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a widely prevalent and morbid disease for which the current standard treatment is supportive care and avoidance of complications with lung-protective ventilation. Lower-tidal volume ventilation has been largely accepted as a means of lung protective ventilation, but the mechanism for its effectiveness is not yet clear, and debate remains as to how best to choose positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Reduction in driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP) has been suggested as a possible means to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. This protocol aims to identify the range of safe paired-settings of PEEP and tidal volume, with selection guided by driving pressure and the stress index, a tool to recognize potential lung hyperinflation during mechanical ventilation.

Interventions

PROCEDURERecruitment Maneuver with PEEP and Tidal Volume Optimization

A staircase recruitment maneuver will be performed on pressure control ventilation followed by a decremental PEEP trial. During the decremental PEEP trial inspiratory tidal volumes will be varied at each step between 3 ml/kg and 10 ml/kg predicted body weight while recording the continuous pressure and flow tracings from the mechanical ventilator. With each PEEP and tidal volume combination, end expiratory and end-inspiratory plateau pressure and stress index will be assessed. At the completion of the decremental PEEP trial, the patient will be returned to ARDSnet-recommended ventilator settings.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit * Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal or tracheostomy tube * Presence of ARDS by Berlin Criteria (acute onset bilateral pulmonary infiltrates incompletely explained by left heart failure together with a PaO2/FiO2 of \<300 or SpO2/FiO2 \<315)

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to obtain surrogate consent * Presence of specified comorbidities: 1. pregnancy 2. pre-existing severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, defined as FEV1 documented \< 1L or baseline hypercapnia 3. cerebral edema 4. known intra-cranial abnormality 5. acute coronary syndrome * Endotracheal or tracheostomy cuff leak * Chest tube with persistent air leak * Severe hemodynamic instability (defined as attending judgment that the patient is unable to safely tolerate ventilator manipulations) * Presence of spontaneous respiratory activity as evidenced by examination of the ventilator waveform tracing * Intrinsic PEEP of \> 5 cmH2O * Assessment of study staff or patient's attending physician that the patient would not be a good study participant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized tidal volumeCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean absolute difference between tidal volume in cc/kg PBW prescribed by ARDSnet settings on ARDSnet PEEP versus maximal protective tidal volume defined by stress index \<1.05 at the ARDSnet PEEP on experimental protocol.
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized driving pressureCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean difference in driving pressure prescribed by ARDSnet settings versus at lowest measured possible driving pressure that achieves equivalent minute ventilation as ARDSnet table with respiratory rate \< or = 35 per minute and SI \<1.05.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized PEEPCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean absolute difference between safest PEEP as determined by experimental protocol with tidal volume of 6 mL/kg PBW (defined as the PEEP at which 6 mL/kg PBW yields the lowest driving pressure with a SI \<1.05) versus the PEEP established by ARDSnet table.
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized elastanceCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean difference in elastance prescribed by ARDSnet settings versus at lowest measured possible elastance achieving equivalent minute ventilation as ARDSnet table with respiratory rate \< or = 35 per minute.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-varying elastanceCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayAssessment of the stability of a model-imputed estimate of time-varying elastance for a given insufflation volume independent of total tidal volume per breath.
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and time-varying elastance-optimized tidal volumeCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean absolute difference between tidal volume in cc/kg PBW prescribed by ARDSnet settings on ARDSnet PEEP versus maximal protective tidal volume defined by the point of rise of model-imputed time-varying elastance at ARDSnet PEEP on experimental protocol.
ICU-free days to 14 days after enrollment14 days post-enrollmentComparison of ICU-free days to 14 days after enrollment between groups of those patients who are ventilated with settings that coincide with those determined to be most protective by the experimental protocol (within 0.5 cc/kg PBW tidal volume and 1 cmH2O of PEEP) versus those not.
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and time-varying elastance-optimized PEEPCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean absolute difference between safest PEEP as determined by experimental protocol with tidal volume of 6 mL/kg PBW (defined as the PEEP at which 6 mL/kg PBW yields the lowest driving pressure without a rising time-varying elastance) versus the PEEP established by ARDSnet table.
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and time-varying elastance-optimized driving pressureCompletion of the study intervention, less than 1 dayMean difference in driving pressure prescribed by ARDSnet settings versus at lowest measured possible driving pressure that achieves equivalent minute ventilation as ARDSnet table with respiratory rate \< or = 35 per minute and time-varying elastance not rising.
Ventilator-free days to 14 days after enrollment14 days post-enrollmentComparison of ventilator-free days to 14 days after enrollment between groups of those patients who are ventilated with settings that coincide with those determined to be most protective by the experimental protocol (within 0.5 cc/kg PBW tidal volume and 1 cmH2O of PEEP) versus those not.
ICU mortality at 28 days28 days post-enrollmentComparison of 28-day ICU mortality post-enrollment between groups of those patients who are ventilated with settings that coincide with those determined to be most protective by the experimental protocol (within 0.5 cc/kg PBW tidal volume and 1 cmH2O of PEEP) versus those not.
In-hospital mortality at 28 days28 days post-enrollmentComparison of 28-day in-hospital mortality post-enrollment between groups of those patients who are ventilated with settings that coincide with those determined to be most protective by the experimental protocol (within 0.5 cc/kg PBW tidal volume and 1 cmH2O of PEEP) versus those not.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026