Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of BCX7353 to Prevent Angioedema Attacks in Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BCX7353 as a Preventative Treatment to Reduce the Frequency of Attacks in Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02870972
Acronym
APeX-1
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-08-18
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

Brief summary

This 3-part study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oral treatment, BCX7353, in preventing angioedema attacks in subjects with hereditary angioedema (HAE). In Part 1 of the study, eligible subjects will be randomized to receive oral BCX7353 or placebo for 4 weeks. Assuming successful completion of Part 1, additional subjects will be randomized in Part 2 to one of 2 lower doses of BCX7353 or placebo. Part 3 will enroll additional subjects into one of three doses of BCX7353 or placebo. The study will compare the number of acute attacks in each treatment group, as well as a number of other clinical and pharmacologic outcomes, and the safety and tolerability of each dose of BCX7353 compared to placebo.

Interventions

Plasma kallikrein inhibitor

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * A clinical diagnosis of HAE type I or II * Documented HAE attacks within a defined calendar period * Access to acute attack medications * Sexually active women of child-bearing potential and sexually active men must utilize effective contraception Key

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Any clinical condition or medical history that would interfere with the subject's safety or ability to participate in the study * Use of C1INH, androgens or tranexamic acid for prophylaxis of HAE attacks * History of or current alcohol or drug abuse * Infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV * Participation in any other investigational drug study currently or within the last 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Confirmed HAE AttacksInvestigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).Efficacy was evaluated by the number of acute angioedema attacks. To ensure that consistent, objective assessments were used in accepting subject-reported attack data, a panel of expert physicians in the treatment of HAE patients adjudicated all subject-reported attacks prior to their inclusion in primary efficacy analyses.
Proportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodInvestigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).Assessment of the proportion of subjects who had no HAE attacks during the entire dosing period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HAE Attacks Requiring TreatmentInvestigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed the number of attacks requiring treatment with acute HAE medication (Berinert, Firazyr, Cinryze or Ruconest)
HAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score28-day treatment period + 1 dayActivity of disease (i.e. disease severity) was assessed using a modified Angioedema Activity Score (AAS). The relevant endpoint for this study was the total modified AAS score, defined as the sum of the individual scores for 4 AAS domains (daily activities, appearance, physical discomfort, and overall severity) for all subject-reported attacks reported during the treatment period. Individual domain scores were based on answers to questions each of which had 4 possible responses scored 0-3 (0 - no impact; 1-3 - increasing levels of impact). The total modified AAS score per attack could range from 0 to 12; lower scores & higher scores represent lower & higher disease activities, respectively. However, the overall total modified AAS score reported for this study included the total scores for all subject-reported attacks, therefore the upper limit of the range was subject-specific. The statistical analysis of the total modified AAS scores for the treatment period is presented below.
Number of Confirmed Abdominal HAE AttacksInvestigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed confirmed attacks by anatomical location; abdominal HAE attacks included any abdominal symptoms (i.e. swelling in the stomach/gut, or any symptoms of nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain)
DASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)The DASS was administered at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, and Day 29.The Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale (DASS) was used to measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety & stress. This assessment was based on a DASS questionnaire administered at baseline, Day 14 & Day 29. The questionnaire consisted of 3 DASS scales (depression, anxiety & stress) containing 14 items each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0, did not apply to me at all; 1, applied to me to some degree/some of the time; 2, applied to me to a considerable degree/a good part of the time; 3, applied to me very much or most of the time). Per-subject scores for the depression, anxiety & stress scales were obtained by summing the scores for the appropriate questionnaire items for the respective category. Total DASS scores were then derived as the sum of the 3 individual scales & ranged from 0 to 126. Higher & lower total scores are associated with more & less adverse impact, respectively. The statistical analysis of the total DASS score change from baseline to Day 29 is presented below.
Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)The subject-completed AE-QoL was administered at baseline (Day 1) and at Day 29Quality of Life (QoL) specific to hereditary angioedema (HAE) was assessed at baseline and Day 29 by a questionnaire (i.e. AE-QoL) consisting of 17 questions that spanned 4 domains (functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, and nutrition). Each AE-QoL question had 5 answer options (scored 1-5), with lower and higher scores indicting less and more adverse impact, respectively. Per-subject scores for each domain were computed using the appropriate scoring algorithm applied to the question response scores for each domain. Per-subject total scores (including all 4 domains) were similarly computed using the question response scores for all 17 questions. The outputs from the scoring algorithm were normalized on a scale ranging from 0 (less adverse impact) to 100 (most adverse impact). The statistical analysis of the AE-QoL total score change from baseline to Day 29 is presented below.
Number of Confirmed Peripheral HAE AttacksInvestigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed confirmed attacks by anatomical location; peripheral attacks included any with peripheral symptoms only (i.e. peripheral swelling or erythema marginatum).

Countries

Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, North Macedonia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

HAE subjects attended a Screening Visit up to 21 days before the baseline visit, for assessment of eligibility to participate in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1: Berotralstat 350 mg
Berotralstat capsules, 350 mg dose administered once per day for 28 days
18
Parts 2 & 3: Berotralstat 250 mg
Berotralstat capsules, 250 mg dose administered once per day for 28 days
14
Parts 2 & 3: Berotralstat 125 mg
Berotralstat capsules, 125 mg dose administered once per day for 28 days
14
Part 3: Berotralstat 62.5 mg
Berotralstat capsules, 62.5 mg dose administered once per day for 28 days
7
Parts 1, 2 & 3: Placebo
Placebo capsules, administered once per day for 28 days
22
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event10000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1: Berotralstat 350 mgTotalParts 1, 2 & 3: PlaceboPart 3: Berotralstat 62.5 mgParts 2 & 3: Berotralstat 125 mgParts 2 & 3: Berotralstat 250 mg
Adjusted qualifying HAE attack rate0.84 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35
0.90 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
0.87 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
1.05 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
0.94 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
0.91 HAE attacks/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
Age, Continuous43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants68 Participants20 Participants7 Participants14 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
0 participants3 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 participants6 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 participants8 participants3 participants1 participants3 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
0 participants5 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
2 participants12 participants5 participants0 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
1 participants3 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
2 participants7 participants2 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
North Macedonia
2 participants9 participants2 participants0 participants5 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 participants6 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
2 participants5 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 participants11 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants46 Participants13 Participants6 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants29 Participants9 Participants1 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 140 / 140 / 70 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 1811 / 147 / 144 / 715 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 181 / 140 / 140 / 70 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Confirmed HAE Attacks

Efficacy was evaluated by the number of acute angioedema attacks. To ensure that consistent, objective assessments were used in accepting subject-reported attack data, a panel of expert physicians in the treatment of HAE patients adjudicated all subject-reported attacks prior to their inclusion in primary efficacy analyses.

Time frame: Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.519 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.115
Berotralstat 250 mgNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.527 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.13
Berotralstat 125 mgNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.249 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.13
Berotralstat 62.5 mgNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.852 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.185
BerotralstatNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.494 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.067
PlaceboNumber of Confirmed HAE Attacks0.952 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.104
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.74, -0.127]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-0.755, -0.095]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.033, 0.373]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.63995% CI: [-0.52, 0.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.703, -0.214]ANCOVA
Primary

Proportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing Period

Assessment of the proportion of subjects who had no HAE attacks during the entire dosing period

Time frame: Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post-baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Berotralstat 350 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)2 participants
Berotralstat 350 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)2 participants
Berotralstat 350 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free4 participants
Berotralstat 250 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free3 participants
Berotralstat 250 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)3 participants
Berotralstat 250 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)3 participants
Berotralstat 125 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)4 participants
Berotralstat 125 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free4 participants
Berotralstat 125 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)4 participants
Berotralstat 62.5 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)0 participants
Berotralstat 62.5 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free0 participants
Berotralstat 62.5 mgProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)0 participants
BerotralstatProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free11 participants
BerotralstatProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)9 participants
BerotralstatProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)9 participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free1 participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = exclude)1 participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Were HAE Attack-free During the Entire Dosing PeriodHAE Attack Free (missing diary = attack)1 participants
p-value: 0.27795% CI: [-6.3, 40.1]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.06495% CI: [-1.2, 49.2]Fisher Exact
p-value: 195% CI: [-13.2, 4.2]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.09795% CI: [-30.2, -2.2]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.15595% CI: [-3.4, 38.8]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)

Quality of Life (QoL) specific to hereditary angioedema (HAE) was assessed at baseline and Day 29 by a questionnaire (i.e. AE-QoL) consisting of 17 questions that spanned 4 domains (functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, and nutrition). Each AE-QoL question had 5 answer options (scored 1-5), with lower and higher scores indicting less and more adverse impact, respectively. Per-subject scores for each domain were computed using the appropriate scoring algorithm applied to the question response scores for each domain. Per-subject total scores (including all 4 domains) were similarly computed using the question response scores for all 17 questions. The outputs from the scoring algorithm were normalized on a scale ranging from 0 (less adverse impact) to 100 (most adverse impact). The statistical analysis of the AE-QoL total score change from baseline to Day 29 is presented below.

Time frame: The subject-completed AE-QoL was administered at baseline (Day 1) and at Day 29

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgAngioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)-12.59 AE-QoL score - change from baselineStandard Error 4.04
Berotralstat 250 mgAngioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)-13.39 AE-QoL score - change from baselineStandard Error 4.44
Berotralstat 125 mgAngioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)-28.95 AE-QoL score - change from baselineStandard Error 4.44
Berotralstat 62.5 mgAngioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)-12.30 AE-QoL score - change from baselineStandard Error 6.32
BerotralstatAngioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)-4.47 AE-QoL score - change from baselineStandard Error 3.54
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.13595% CI: [-18.826, 2.584]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.12195% CI: [-20.26, 2.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-35.834, -13.137]ANOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.28495% CI: [-22.316, 6.64]ANCOVA
Secondary

DASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)

The Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale (DASS) was used to measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety & stress. This assessment was based on a DASS questionnaire administered at baseline, Day 14 & Day 29. The questionnaire consisted of 3 DASS scales (depression, anxiety & stress) containing 14 items each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0, did not apply to me at all; 1, applied to me to some degree/some of the time; 2, applied to me to a considerable degree/a good part of the time; 3, applied to me very much or most of the time). Per-subject scores for the depression, anxiety & stress scales were obtained by summing the scores for the appropriate questionnaire items for the respective category. Total DASS scores were then derived as the sum of the 3 individual scales & ranged from 0 to 126. Higher & lower total scores are associated with more & less adverse impact, respectively. The statistical analysis of the total DASS score change from baseline to Day 29 is presented below.

Time frame: The DASS was administered at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, and Day 29.

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded. Only data from subjects who completed the DASS-42 questionnaire (i.e. 3 DASS scales each containing 14 items) were included in this analyses. Data collected on the DASS-21 questionnaire were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgDASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)-7.627 DASS score - D29 change from baselineStandard Error 3.275
Berotralstat 250 mgDASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)-6.429 DASS score - D29 change from baselineStandard Error 3.609
Berotralstat 125 mgDASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)-10.840 DASS score - D29 change from baselineStandard Error 3.477
Berotralstat 62.5 mgDASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)-9.141 DASS score - D29 change from baselineStandard Error 5.336
BerotralstatDASS (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales)0.643 DASS score - D29 change from baselineStandard Error 2.984
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [-17.132, 0.592]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.13695% CI: [-16.432, 2.287]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-20.642, -2.325]ANOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.11495% CI: [-22.001, 2.431]ANCOVA
Secondary

HAE Attacks Requiring Treatment

A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed the number of attacks requiring treatment with acute HAE medication (Berinert, Firazyr, Cinryze or Ruconest)

Time frame: Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.483 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.109
Berotralstat 250 mgHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.449 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.123
Berotralstat 125 mgHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.218 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.1231
Berotralstat 62.5 mgHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.833 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.174
BerotralstatHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.450 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.063
PlaceboHAE Attacks Requiring Treatment0.776 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.098
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.557, -0.095]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.04795% CI: [-0.582, 0.004]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.638, -0.016]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.87, -0.247]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.77595% CI: [-0.339, 0.454]ANCOVA
Secondary

HAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score

Activity of disease (i.e. disease severity) was assessed using a modified Angioedema Activity Score (AAS). The relevant endpoint for this study was the total modified AAS score, defined as the sum of the individual scores for 4 AAS domains (daily activities, appearance, physical discomfort, and overall severity) for all subject-reported attacks reported during the treatment period. Individual domain scores were based on answers to questions each of which had 4 possible responses scored 0-3 (0 - no impact; 1-3 - increasing levels of impact). The total modified AAS score per attack could range from 0 to 12; lower scores & higher scores represent lower & higher disease activities, respectively. However, the overall total modified AAS score reported for this study included the total scores for all subject-reported attacks, therefore the upper limit of the range was subject-specific. The statistical analysis of the total modified AAS scores for the treatment period is presented below.

Time frame: 28-day treatment period + 1 day

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgHAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score14.070 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.61
Berotralstat 250 mgHAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score9.416 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.952
Berotralstat 125 mgHAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score7.256 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.954
Berotralstat 62.5 mgHAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score22.559 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
BerotralstatHAE Disease Activity - Modified Angioedema Activity Score18.519 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.356
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.20995% CI: [-11.453, 2.555]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-16.639, -1.567]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-18.808, -3.718]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the terms of treatment and adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.40595% CI: [-5.586, 13.665]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks

A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed confirmed attacks by anatomical location; abdominal HAE attacks included any abdominal symptoms (i.e. swelling in the stomach/gut, or any symptoms of nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain)

Time frame: Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.366 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.073
Berotralstat 250 mgNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.324 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.082
Berotralstat 125 mgNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.173 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.083
Berotralstat 62.5 mgNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.404 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.117
BerotralstatNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.309 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.042
PlaceboNumber of Confirmed Abdominal HAE Attacks0.370 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.066
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.43995% CI: [-0.216, 0.094]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.96895% CI: [-0.198, 0.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.66795% CI: [-0.254, 0.164]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.06595% CI: [-0.406, 0.012]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.79795% CI: [-0.232, 0.301]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks

A prespecified secondary endpoint analyzed confirmed attacks by anatomical location; peripheral attacks included any with peripheral symptoms only (i.e. peripheral swelling or erythema marginatum).

Time frame: Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 29 or last day of dosing +24 hrs (the effective dosing period).

Population: The Full Analysis Set population included all subjects who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had post baseline HAE diary data recorded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Berotralstat 350 mgNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.160 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.086
Berotralstat 250 mgNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.143 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.097
Berotralstat 125 mgNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.098 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.097
Berotralstat 62.5 mgNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.463 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.138
BerotralstatNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.179 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboNumber of Confirmed Peripheral HAE Attacks0.543 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.078
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.547, -0.181]ANOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.613, -0.154]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.647, -0.154]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.692, -0.198]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary analysis of treatment-effect was performed using an ANCOVA with the adjusted qualifying attack rate as the covariate.p-value: 0.61495% CI: [-0.394, 0.234]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026