Skip to content

Durvalumab and Tremelimumab and Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

A Phase II Randomized Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab and Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Refractory to Standard Therapies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02870920
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-08-17
Start date
2016-10-12
Completion date
2022-06-07
Last updated
2023-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

The standard or usual treatment for this disease is treatment with drugs and other treatments that may help to make a patient better or may improve their quality of life. This treatment is known as best supportive care (BSC). Although patients with best supportive care can feel better for some months, the cancer usually continues to grow.

Detailed description

Durvalumab is a new type of drug for many types of cancer. Laboratory tests show that it works by allowing the immune system to detect cancer and reactivate the immune response. This may help to slow down the growth of cancer or may cause cancer cells to die. Durvalumab has been shown to shrink tumours in animals and has been studied in a few people and seems promising but it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment alone. Tremelimumab is a new type of drug for various types of cancers. It works in a similar way to durvalumab and may improve the effect of durvalumab. This may also help slow the growth of the cancer cells or may cause cancer cells to die. Tremelimumab has been shown to shrink tumours in animals and has been studied in a few people and seems promising but it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment alone when used with durvalumab. Combinations of durvalumab and tremelimumab have also been studied and when combined have been shown to increase tumour shrinkage in animals compared to either drug alone and while the combination has been studied in a few people, it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment.

Interventions

DRUGTremelimumab
DRUGDurvalumab
OTHERBest Supportive Care

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have histologically or pathologically confirmed advanced (metastatic or locally advanced) colorectal cancer that is unresectable. * Received a prior thymidylate synthase inhibitor (e.g. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine, raltitrexed, UFT) for metastatic disease or as adjuvant therapy. A thymidylate synthase inhibitor may have been given in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. * Received and failed an irinotecan -containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease, OR relapsed within 6 months of completion of an irinotecan-containing adjuvant therapy, OR have documented unsuitability for an irinotecan-containing regimen. * Received and failed an oxaliplatin-containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease, OR relapsed within 6 months of completion of an oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy OR have documented unsuitability for an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. * For patients with colorectal cancer that is RAS-wild type: Received and failed a cetuximab or panitumumab-containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease OR have documented unsuitability for a cetuximab or panitumumab-containing regimen * Patient prior treatment with VEGF targeting therapy, such as bevacizumab, aflibercept, ramucirumab, or regorafenib, is permitted but not mandatory. Reasons not used are to be documented. * Patient prior treatment with TAS-102 (an agent composed of a combination of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI)), is permitted but not mandatory. * The only remaining standard available therapy as recommended by the Investigator, in consultation with the patient, is best supportive care. * Must have presence of measurable or evaluable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1). * Imaging investigations including CT/MRI of chest/abdomen/pelvis or other scans as necessary to document all sites of disease done within 28 days prior to randomization. * Must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. * Life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks at the time of study entry. * Must be ≥ 18 years of age. * Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. * Patient must consent to provision of, and investigator(s) must confirm adequacy of tissue, and confirm access to and agree to submit within 4 weeks of randomization to the CCTG Central Tumour Bank, a representative formalin fixed paraffin block of tumour tissue in order that the specific correlative marker assays may be conducted. * Patient must consent to provision of samples of blood in order that the specific correlative marker assays * Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaires in either English or French. Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up. * In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 2 working days of patient randomization. * The patient is not receiving therapy in a concurrent clinical study and the patient agrees not to participate in other clinical studies during their participation in this trial while on study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival24 monthsTime from randomization to death from any cause with patients who were alive at the time of the final analysis or who became lost to follow-up censored at their last date known to be alive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival24 monthsDefined as the time from randomization to the first objective documentation of disease progression, defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, or death due to any cause with patients who had not progressed or died at the time of final analysis censored on the date of the last tumour assessment.
Objective Response Rate24 monthsDefined as percentage of participants with objective response over all participants randomized. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From August 10, 2016 to June 29, 2017 in 27 cancer centres in Canada

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Best Supportive Care
Best supportive care available Best Supportive Care
61
Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive Care
Tremelimumab 75mg IV 60 minutes Day 1, cycles 1-4 Durvalumab 1500mg IV 60 minutes Day 1 every 28 days. Plus best supportive care Tremelimumab Durvalumab Best Supportive Care
119
Total180

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBest Supportive CareDurvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive CareTotal
Age, Customized
65 years or older
30 Participants63 Participants93 Participants
Age, Customized
Younger than 65 years
31 Participants56 Participants87 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0
17 Participants33 Participants50 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1
44 Participants86 Participants130 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants16 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
54 Participants97 Participants151 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
61 participants119 participants180 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants45 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants74 Participants121 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
54 / 61100 / 118
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 61116 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6155 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Time from randomization to death from any cause with patients who were alive at the time of the final analysis or who became lost to follow-up censored at their last date known to be alive.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: All randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Best Supportive CareOverall Survival4.1 months
Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive CareOverall Survival6.6 months
p-value: 0.0790% CI: [0.54, 0.97]Log Rank
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Defined as percentage of participants with objective response over all participants randomized. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: All randomized patients

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Supportive CareObjective Response RateNot responded61 Participants
Best Supportive CareObjective Response RateResponded0 Participants
Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive CareObjective Response RateResponded1 Participants
Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive CareObjective Response RateNot responded118 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Defined as the time from randomization to the first objective documentation of disease progression, defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, or death due to any cause with patients who had not progressed or died at the time of final analysis censored on the date of the last tumour assessment.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: All randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Best Supportive CareProgression-free Survival1.9 Months
Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive CareProgression-free Survival1.8 Months
p-value: 0.9790% CI: [0.76, 1.34]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026