Skip to content

The Use of Micro Vibratory Stimulation Technique to Control the Pain of Digit Block Anesthesia

The Use of Micro Vibratory Stimulation Technique to Control the Pain of Digit Block Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02870595
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-08-17
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Analgesia

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive 1% lidocaine injections for digit blocks of the finger will experience less pain when the injection is accompanied by the use of a micro-vibratory stimulator (MVS) compared with patients who receive injections without the MVS.

Detailed description

Research Question/Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive 1% lidocaine injections for digit blocks of the finger will experience less pain when the injection is accompanied by the use of a micro-vibratory stimulator (MVS) compared with patients who receive injections without the MVS. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to compare the pain rating scale from an exposure group (digit block injection with the aid MVS) and the control group (traditional injection).

Interventions

DEVICEMicrovibratory Stimulator

Informed consent will be obtained from patients undergoing finger local anesthesia digit blocks. Subjects will be randomly assigned (using GraphPAD Randomization Software Tool) to receive the first of their two digit block injections with either the traditional technique (control) or while using the DVICS/ Microvibratory Stimulator. All injections will utilize a 27-gauge needle. The subjects will be given a standard dose of 2mls of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine delivered over 30 seconds. Injections will be timed and performed by a single clinician to avoid large variations in technique and expertise.

DEVICEMicrovibratory Stimulator'

As above, Microvibratory Stimulator will be used as a sham device in parallel group.

Sponsors

Christus Spohn Memorial Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65 who are willing and able to consent and who require the use of local anesthetic digit block to both sides of a finger for the treatment of wounds, injuries, infections, or laceration of the fingers.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to any type of local anesthetic. * Inability to Consent. * Inability to complete a numeric pain scale. * Clinical appearance or clinical evidence of intoxication. * Significant compromising conditions such as major trauma and severe respiratory distress.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain associated with injection of lidocaine30 secondsSubjects will rate pain of injection using a 0-10 VAS

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026