Skip to content

Increased Physical Activity Through Mindfulness

Increased Adherence to Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP) Through Mindfulness- A Pilot Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02869854
Acronym
FAR-MIND
Enrollment
88
Registered
2016-08-17
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2018-12-18
Last updated
2025-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Life Style, Mindfulness, Physical Activity

Brief summary

In a pilot study, 90 physically inactive patients will be opportunistically and consecutively recruited and randomized to three intervention groups: mindfulness training, Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP) or only PAP. Follow-up will be done at baseline, three and six months with questionnaires, accelerometers and analysis of traditional risk factors to evaluate whether mindfulness may increase physical activity and decrease physical inactivity.

Detailed description

All patients between 40 and 65 years of age who fulfil the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate in the study. Posters with information about the study will be put in the waiting room and in other strategic places. Patients who accept to participate will get written and oral information; they will sign an informed consent after the information. The patients will estimate their level of physical activity in minutes per week to control inclusion criteria. The patients will return in the morning for fasting blood samples and get an accelerometer attached to them to wear for 7 days. During this time, randomization will be performed. They will also get to answer a couple of different surveys. The results from the surveys and blood samples will be the study baseline. All patients with abnormal test results will follow a specific flow diagram for the usual care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindfulness

Mindfulness course during 8 weeks with 20 minutes mindfulness exercise each day

BEHAVIORALPAP

Physical Activity on Prescription, after 3 months a new prescription

Sponsors

Lund University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals between 40-65 years of age, with insufficient physical activity ( \<150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity throughout the week, or \< 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity throughout the week, or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity.)

Exclusion criteria

* Dementia, severe mental disorder,newly diagnosed untreated unstable angina pectoris,myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to study entry. Individuals who do not master the Swedish language in speech and writing will be excluded.The patients who have abnormal values according to guidelines that require contact with a physician on the same day or week will also be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline ,6 months.Each individual will wear an activity monitor for 7 days. This will be done at baseline and after 6 months. The difference in the time of physical activity level was measured in minutes of activity during a week and then divided into percentages of sedentary time, light physical activity time and moderate to vigourous physical activity time, measured by activity monitor Actigraph (GT3X). In the analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsInsomnia Severity Index(ISI); is a self-report questionnaire measuring insomnia symptoms to evaluate the degree of insomnia. The scale consists of seven questions that evaluate Sleep mode, sleep during the night, waking up early, the feeling of being rested, how sleeping problems affect daily life, and how sleep patterns concern the individual. The higher the score, the better the outcome. Minimun score = 0, Maximum score = 28
Difference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Healthbase-line ,3 months, 6 monthsassessment based on terms of perceived health with five alternative answers, a higher score incdicates a better outcome 1. very poor 2. poor 3. fair 4. good 5. very good

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PAP Only
This group will follow the referral scheme for three months, and after this period they will leave new blood samples and answer surveys. They will get a new PAP with follow up after another 3 months. PAP: Physical Activity on Prescription, after 3 months a new prescription
29
Mindfulness Only
Mindfulness. This group will receive a group course in mindfulness during 8 weeks once a week, and with 20 minutes of daily personal training. Three and six months after inclusion they will answer a new set of surveys and fasting blood samples. Mindfulness: Mindfulness course during 8 weeks with 20 minutes mindfulness exercise each day
30
Combination of the Two Groups
Mindfulness and physical activity prescription. This group will get a combination of the two other groups. PAP will be prescribed during the first meeting and another one after 3 months. During the first 8 weeks once a week they will participate in a mindfulness training group and also preform 20 minutes of daily training. The same surveys as the other groups and fasting blood samples Mindfulness: Mindfulness course during 8 weeks with 20 minutes mindfulness exercise each day PAP: Physical Activity on Prescription, after 3 months a new prescription
29
Total88

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPAP OnlyMindfulness OnlyCombination of the Two GroupsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants30 Participants29 Participants88 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years53 years54 years54 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
29 Participants30 Participants29 Participants88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants22 Participants20 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 290 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 290 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 290 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)

Each individual will wear an activity monitor for 7 days. This will be done at baseline and after 6 months. The difference in the time of physical activity level was measured in minutes of activity during a week and then divided into percentages of sedentary time, light physical activity time and moderate to vigourous physical activity time, measured by activity monitor Actigraph (GT3X). In the analysis

Time frame: Baseline ,6 months.

Population: Baseline and 6 months follow-up after inclusion. Change in percentage of sedentary time and time in different intensity of physical activity per valid day and averaged over the number of valid days, activity monitor measured

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in sedentary time66.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 6.7
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in LIPA30.9 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 6.2
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in MVPA2.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.18
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months:Percent of time in sedentary time65.0 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 6.8
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months Percent of LIPA32.0 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 5.8
PAP OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months: Percent of MVPA2.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.02
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months: Percent of MVPA1.9 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.02
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in sedentary time65.5 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 9.2
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months:Percent of time in sedentary time65.9 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 9.4
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months Percent of LIPA31.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 9
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in LIPA31.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.2
Mindfulness OnlyDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in MVPA2.3 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.02
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in LIPA30.3 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in MVPA2.4 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.02
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months: Percent of MVPA2.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 0.02
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months:Percent of time in sedentary time64.0 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 9.1
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)Baseline:Percent of time in sedentary time66.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.8
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference in Percentage of Time Spent Per Physical Activity Level Per Week of Time, Between the Three Different Groups Measured by Activity Monitor Actigraph (GT3X)6 months Percent of LIPA32.8 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Difference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep Problems

Insomnia Severity Index(ISI); is a self-report questionnaire measuring insomnia symptoms to evaluate the degree of insomnia. The scale consists of seven questions that evaluate Sleep mode, sleep during the night, waking up early, the feeling of being rested, how sleeping problems affect daily life, and how sleep patterns concern the individual. The higher the score, the better the outcome. Minimun score = 0, Maximum score = 28

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: decreasing numbers due to drop-out

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PAP OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 3 months7 score on a scale
PAP OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index baseline8 score on a scale
PAP OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 6 months6 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 3 months11 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index baseline11 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 6 months13 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index baseline10 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 6 months9 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between Groups in the Amount of Self-perceived Sleep ProblemsInsomnia Severity Index 3 months9 score on a scale
Secondary

Difference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health

assessment based on terms of perceived health with five alternative answers, a higher score incdicates a better outcome 1. very poor 2. poor 3. fair 4. good 5. very good

Time frame: base-line ,3 months, 6 months

Population: The number decreases during the study due to dropout, lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PAP OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health3 months3 score on a scale
PAP OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated HealthBaseline3 score on a scale
PAP OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health6 months4 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health3 months3 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated HealthBaseline3 score on a scale
Mindfulness OnlyDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health6 months4 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated HealthBaseline3 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health6 months4 score on a scale
Combination of the Two GroupsDifference Between the Three Groups in Revised Assessment of Their Self-rated Health3 months4 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026