Rectal Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
sentinel lymph node, lymphatic mapping, rectal tumor, rectal cancer, early stage
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to develop a technique that allows physicians to identify the first lymph nodes draining from a rectal tumor (the sentinel lymph nodes). Currently, there is no technique used to find these lymph nodes in the rectum during surgery and therefore many patients with rectal cancer need to undergo a total rectal resection. Dyes, tracers, imaging and a gamma probe will be used in this study during a standard minimally invasive transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) to try to locate these lymph nodes. If surgeons are able to locate these lymph nodes they will be removed during surgery. If the technique is successfully developed as a result of this research, it could help patients in the future with early stage rectal cancer by allowing doctors to see if their cancer has spread to the lymph nodes of the rectum without having to undergo a total rectal resection. These patients would then be able to undergo a TES combined with a lymph node dissection to gain more knowledge about the stage of their disease. This knowledge would then be used to determine if and what further treatment is necessary for the patient's rectal cancer.
Interventions
Radiotracer injection around the rectal tumor for SLN mapping with gamma probe
OTHEREndoscopic injection of ICG
Dye injection around the rectal tumor for SLN mapping with NIR imaging.
OTHEREndoscopic injection of Spot
Dye injection for tattooing rectal tumor prior to surgical resection.
PROCEDUREFlexible sigmoidoscopy
Flexible sigmoidoscopy prior to surgery to facilitate endoscopic injections of radiotracer and dyes.
PROCEDUREEndoscopic NIR imaging and gamma probe
Endoscopic near infrared (NIR) imaging of ICG and detection of radiotracer with gamma probe after standard removal of rectal neoplasm.
PROCEDUREDissection of sentinel lymph node(s)
Surgical removal of identified lymph nodes in the rectum.
Sponsors
University of Virginia
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients undergoing elective transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) at the University of Virginia for rectal neoplasm (polyp with high grade dysplasia, T1N0 tumors \< 3cm in the absence of poor pathologic features, patients that refuse radical resection) * Willing and able to give written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients less than 18 years of age * Women who are pregnant and/or breastfeeding * Prisoners * Unable to give written informed consent * Patients with any of the following: * Allergy to technetium, Spot and/or ICG * Allergy to iodides * Severe cardiac disease (hospitalization for cardiac disease in the last year, congestive heart failure, abnormal EKG) or renal disease (Creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL) * Patients with medical contradictions or have potential problems complying with the requirements of the protocol, in the opinion of the investigator
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Phase: Detection rate of sentinel lymph node in first 6 patients | Throughout first phase of study, an average of 1 year. | Data from the first 6 eligible patients will be used to verify feasibility. For this phase, the data need to support a detection rate of at least 50% for the procedure to be considered feasible to move forward with the 2nd phase. The proposed SLNm technique will be declared 'feasible' if at least one SLN is identified per patient. Identification of the SLN in three consecutive patients would provide 80% confidence of successful identification more than 50% of the time. A total sample of size of 6 patients would allow for three refinements in technique if necessary to establish feasibility. |
| 2nd Phase: Detection rate of refined protocol in identifying SLN | Throughout first phase of study, an average of 1.5 years. | 2nd Phase: Sample size is set at 16 eligible patients. For this study, continued investigation of the proposed technique would be of interest if 70-100% of the SLNs are detected. If at least on SLN is detected in 14 of 16 patients, an observed rate of 87.5%, then the lower limit of a one-sided 90% confidence interval is 70%. Thus, detection of at least one SLN in 14 or more patients out of 16 assessed would provide strong preliminary data for the technique (i.e. SLN is detected in at least 70% of patients). If it's assumed, on average, 1.5 SLN could be identified and excised per patient, then with 24 possible SLN, the estimated rate of SLN positive for disease would have an expected half width (or precision of the estimate) of 12-14%. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Time required for completion of the protocol | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years. |
| Number of protocol modifications for procedural and/or technical issues | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years |
| Size of the SLN according to pathologic analysis | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years |
| Ergonomic optimization of the protocol as measured by surgeon satisfaction | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years |
| Ergonomic optimization of the protocol as measured by operative time | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years |
| Location of the SLN according to pathologic analysis | Throughout study, an average of 2.5 years. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactAmy Harrigan, BS, CCRC
Outcome results
None listed