Skip to content

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Assessing Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02867072
Enrollment
593
Registered
2016-08-15
Start date
2004-01-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2016-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Appendicitis

Brief summary

Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Because of lack of consensus about the most appropriate technique, appendectomy is still being performed by both open (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) methods. In this retrospective analysis, the investigators aimed to compare the laparoscopic approach and the conventional technique in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic appendectomy

Sponsors

University of Catania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute appendicitis

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women and patients with severe medical disease (hemodynamic instability, chronic medical or psychiatric illness, cirrhosis, coagulation disorders) requiring intensive care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital cost3 daysMean hospital cost (in Euro) for patients that underwent appendectomy
Wound infection1 weekNumber of patients with wound infection after appendectomy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026