Skip to content

Safety of Nasal Influenza Immunisation in Children With Asthma

Safety of Nasal Influenza Immunisation in Children With Asthma - The SNIFFLE-4 Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02866942
Acronym
SNIFFLE-4
Enrollment
479
Registered
2016-08-15
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2019-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

A new influenza vaccine, known as LAIV (Live Attenuated Intranasal Vaccine) has recently been approved by a number of licensing boards and is given by a spray into the nose. In the United Kingdom (UK), the vaccine has been demonstrated to be highly effective against influenza infection. Further, despite concerns that LAIV can cause wheezing in children under age 2 years, the previous SNIFFLE studies have demonstrated it to be safe in children over 2 years with mild-moderate asthma. The objective of this multicentre study is to further assess the safety of intranasal LAIV in children with asthma and recurrent wheeze, including those with severe symptoms.

Interventions

Sponsors

Public Health England
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 2 - 18 years old (inclusive) * Physician diagnosis of asthma or recurrent wheezing (by the hospital specialist) AND (i) in children age 2-4 years: ≥2 exacerbations in the past year requiring oral steroids or observation in-hospital beyond 4 hours duration, OR (ii) in children ≥ 5 years of age, receiving treatment equivalent to at least BTS/SIGN step 2 therapy. * Written informed consent from parent/guardian (or the patient themselves from age 16 years), with assent from children aged 8 years and above wherever possible.

Exclusion criteria

1. Admission to Paediatric Intensive Care for invasive ventilation due to a respiratory illness in the preceding 2 years. 2. Contraindications to LAIV (notwithstanding allergy to egg protein), which include: 1. Hypersensitivity to the active ingredients, gelatin or gentamicin (a possible trace residue) 2. Previous systemic allergic reaction to LAIV 3. Previous allergic reaction to an influenza vaccine (not LAIV) is a relative contra-indication, which must be discussed with the site PI to confirm patient suitability 4. Children/adolescents who are clinically immunodeficient due to conditions or immunosuppressive therapy such as: acute and chronic leukaemias; lymphoma; symptomatic HIV infection; cellular immune deficiencies; and high-dose corticosteroids\*\*. \*\*High-dose steroids is defined as a treatment course for at least one month, equivalent to a dose greater than 20mg prednisolone per day (any age), or for children under 20kg, a dose greater than 1mg/kg/day. NB: LAIV is not contraindicated for use in individuals with asymptomatic HIV infection; or individuals who are receiving topical/inhaled/low-dose oral systemic corticosteroids or those receiving corticosteroids as replacement therapy, e.g. for adrenal insufficiency. 5. Children and adolescents younger than 18 years of age receiving salicylate therapy because of the association of Reye's syndrome with salicylates and wild-type influenza infection. 6. pregnancy 3. Contraindications to vaccination on that occasion, e.g. due to child being acutely unwell: 1. Febrile ≥38.0 degrees C in last 72 hours 2. \*Acute wheeze in last 72 hours requiring treatment beyond that normally prescribed for regular use by the child's treating healthcare professional 3. \*Recent admission to hospital in last 2 weeks for acute asthma 4. \*Current oral steroid for asthma exacerbation or course completed within last 2 weeks 5. Any other significant condition or circumstance which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study. * Items 3b-3d are relative contra-indications: Many children with difficult-to-control symptoms may meet fail to meet these criteria on a routine basis. Where these are present, the study centre PIs are able to authorise participation on a case-by-case basis, after assessing the child and their lung function at the time of enrolment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated Questionnaire4 weeks post LAIVThe validated questionnaire to be used will depend on the age of the enrolled child: * Age 2-4 years: TRACK questionnaire * Age 5-11 years: Children's Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) score * Age 12+ years: Asthma Control Test (ACT) score The change in score (using the appropriate questionnaire for age) between pre- and 4 weeks post LAIV will be used to assess the primary outcome across all participants. a change in (c-)ACT of at least 3 points, or 10 points for TRACK will be determined a significant change. For TRACK, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 100 respectively, the higher the score, the better is symptom control. For c-ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 27 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms. For ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 5 and 25 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIVUp to 4 weeks post LAIV administrationIncidence of a 'significant exacerbation' in asthma, defined as: i. At least 3 day course of oral steroids following an unscheduled contact with a healthcare professional; OR ii. Unscheduled visit to an Emergency department or admission to hospital for treatment of asthma symptoms, requiring systemic corticosteroids

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Asthma
LAIV administration in children with asthma receiving treatment according to British Thoracic Society step 2+ Administration of Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV)
478
Total478

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyInvalid consent1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAsthma
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
476 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous9.3 years
British Thoracic Society (BTS) Treatment Step 4+229 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
478 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
190 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
288 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 478
other
Total, other adverse events
150 / 478
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 478

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated Questionnaire

The validated questionnaire to be used will depend on the age of the enrolled child: * Age 2-4 years: TRACK questionnaire * Age 5-11 years: Children's Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) score * Age 12+ years: Asthma Control Test (ACT) score The change in score (using the appropriate questionnaire for age) between pre- and 4 weeks post LAIV will be used to assess the primary outcome across all participants. a change in (c-)ACT of at least 3 points, or 10 points for TRACK will be determined a significant change. For TRACK, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 100 respectively, the higher the score, the better is symptom control. For c-ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 27 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms. For ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 5 and 25 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms.

Time frame: 4 weeks post LAIV

Population: 4 week follow-up data available in 319/478 participants

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AsthmaChange in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated QuestionnaireImprovement >= MID28 Participants
AsthmaChange in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated QuestionnaireNo change254 Participants
AsthmaChange in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated QuestionnaireDeterioration >= MID37 Participants
p-value: 0.26McNemar
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV

Incidence of a 'significant exacerbation' in asthma, defined as: i. At least 3 day course of oral steroids following an unscheduled contact with a healthcare professional; OR ii. Unscheduled visit to an Emergency department or admission to hospital for treatment of asthma symptoms, requiring systemic corticosteroids

Time frame: Up to 4 weeks post LAIV administration

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AsthmaIncidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV47 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026