Skip to content

Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02865889
Enrollment
343
Registered
2016-08-15
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS, UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS

Keywords

laparoscopic surgery, Uterine Neoplasms

Brief summary

Laparoscopic surgery is gaining currency in the field of oncologic care, particularly for colorectal and gynecologic cancers. This innovation could be used either for staging purpose and therefore could steer global therapeutic options or for surgical management only. Increase knowledge and skills lead to an increase in the number and rate of the women this innovation could be offered. The project team observed a shift from traditional surgical management (abdominal radical surgery) towards laparoscopic with a focus on lymphadenectomy. This innovation however increases some costs (the surgical stage) but decrease some others (the post surgical stage). Foreseeing the pace of the dissemination needs to have objective and reliable data about who had access to laparoscopic surgery and who didn't (and why) and accurate assessment of related costs. This program will focus on uterine cancer (both cervix and corpus).

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
PROCEDUREConventional surgery (abdominal radical surgery)

Sponsors

Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>18 years * Endometrial or cervical cancer

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy2 yearsThe following costs were included:Equipment costs,Instrument costs,Operating room costs,Hospital stay
Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures (Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy)2 yearsComparison of the effectiveness of procedures will take into account conversion rate, complications rate, metastatic and pelvic relapse

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026