Low Back Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Low back pain, stabilization exercises, neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the lumbar spine, to report how tolerable the intervention is, and whether the electrical stimulation improve pain, function and muscle strength.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Between 18 years of age and 60. * Body Mass Index (BMI) of less than 34. * Low Back Pain duration of 3 months or greater (chronic). * Minimum pain level on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is 3 or greater. * Minimum score of Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) is 20 or greater. * Understands English
Exclusion criteria
* Positive nerve root tension signs * Progressive neurological deficit * Positive Babinski sign. * Sensory loss that is not in correspondence with dermatomal distribution or peripheral nerves. * History of spinal surgery * History of inflammatory joint disease * Contraindications to physical exercise including history of cardiac disease or being told by a physician not to engage in physical exercise. * Contraindications to NMES including cardiac pacemaker or skin allergy to adhesives * History of metastatic cancer in previous 5 years or present treatment for cancer * Women who indicate that they are pregnant or plan to become pregnant
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Participants were followed from baseline to 6 weeks | NMES tolerability was performed by asking each subject in the stab + NMES group to describe their subjective perception of both the intensity and discomfort of the NMES current using the descriptors listed in a table. The descriptors represent two distinct domains of adjectives: the sensory aspect of the perceived intensity of stimulation and the affective aspect of the perceived discomfort. Each aspect has 15 adjectives. Each subject was asked to describe the current using the descriptors listed for each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks. To analyze the the subjects description of the current, the 15 descriptors of each aspect were divided into 3 zones (high, medium, low). The top 5 descriptors in each aspect were considered high, the middle 5 descriptors were considered medium, and the bottom descriptors were considered low. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the subjects description of each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks follow-up. |
| Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow up). | The MODQ is a self-reported measure of disability consisting of 10 domains of functional activities related to low back pain. The domains include pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, standing, sitting, traveling, social life, employment/homemaking, and sleeping. Each domain is rated from 0 - 5. The total of all the domains range from 0 - 50. The scores can be multiplied by 2 to get a percentage of functional disability. The higher the percentage the higher the disability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow-up) | The NPRS measures pain intensity on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The higher the score the worst the pain intensity |
| Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) | The Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ) measure avoidant behavior to physical activity or work due to fear of pain. The has two sub scales: physical activity and work. This FABQ consists of 16 items; 5 items for the physical activity sub scale and 11 items for the work subscale. Each item is scored from 0-6. Higher scores on the FABQ are indicative of greater fear and avoidance beliefs. The total score on the FABQ is 66, however, this score is considered separately. The FABQ-physical activity sub scale ranges from 0 - 24 points and the FABQ-work activity ranges from 0 - 42 points. |
| Paraspinal Muscle Strength | Baseline - 6 weeks (post-treatment) | The paraspinal muscle strength was assessed using the Biodex 3 Pro dynamometer (20 Ramsey Rd, Shirley, NY 11967). Active extension of the trunk was performed with the subject in a semi-standing position; the subject's hips were flexed at 60 degrees with the feet resting on an adjustable footrest. The thighs were secured to the seat with two Velcro straps. The scapulae rested against a roll that is attached to the chair arms. The trunk was secured with two Velcro straps that crossed the front trunk forming the shape of an X. The subject was asked to extend the trunk by exerting maximal isometric contraction for 5 seconds against the scapular roll. The average of three 5-second trials was recorded. All subjects received the same verbal instruction: Push your trunk against the scapular roll as strong as you can. The higher the score the stronger the muscles. The range starts from 0 without a limit to the amount of force that could be exerted. |
| Patient Satisfaction Survey | only post-treatment at 6 weeks | Satisfaction level with the interventions. Subjects were asked rate their satisfaction with the treatment by choosing one of the following statements: Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Unsatisfied Very unsatisfied |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises The stabilization exercises program will consist of exercises for the lower back and abdomen. These exercises include various types of abdominal bracing and bridging and side bridging. The exercises will be performed in supine, sidelying, and quadruped. It involves activation of muscles, dissociation of lumbar spine movement from extremities movement and endurance.
Rehabilitation exercises | 15 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation The neuromuscular electrical stimulation is a hand-size unit that has four plastic adhesive electrical conductors known as electrodes. These electrodes are going to be placed on the skin covering the lower back muscles. They will deliver an electric current that will generate muscle contraction that resembles normal muscle contraction. This treatment will be given in addition to the stabilization exercise program.
Rehabilitation exercises
Electrical Stimulation | 15 |
| Total | 30 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Stabilization Exercises | Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 38.33 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 33.40 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 35.87 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15 |
| BMI | 25.89 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 | 26.47 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 | 26.18 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 9 Participants | 13 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 8 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 11 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ)
The MODQ is a self-reported measure of disability consisting of 10 domains of functional activities related to low back pain. The domains include pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, standing, sitting, traveling, social life, employment/homemaking, and sleeping. Each domain is rated from 0 - 5. The total of all the domains range from 0 - 50. The scores can be multiplied by 2 to get a percentage of functional disability. The higher the percentage the higher the disability.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow up).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | Baseline | 30.80 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | 6 weeks | 12.81 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | 10 weeks | 10.00 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | 6 weeks | 14.49 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | Baseline | 30.52 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) | 10 weeks | 13.24 percentage of functional disability | Standard Deviation 8 |
Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
NMES tolerability was performed by asking each subject in the stab + NMES group to describe their subjective perception of both the intensity and discomfort of the NMES current using the descriptors listed in a table. The descriptors represent two distinct domains of adjectives: the sensory aspect of the perceived intensity of stimulation and the affective aspect of the perceived discomfort. Each aspect has 15 adjectives. Each subject was asked to describe the current using the descriptors listed for each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks. To analyze the the subjects description of the current, the 15 descriptors of each aspect were divided into 3 zones (high, medium, low). The top 5 descriptors in each aspect were considered high, the middle 5 descriptors were considered medium, and the bottom descriptors were considered low. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the subjects description of each aspect at baseline and at 6 weeks follow-up.
Time frame: Participants were followed from baseline to 6 weeks
Population: This outcome measure was only used with the Stabilization plus Electrical Stimulation
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week discomfort medium | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week sensory high | 10 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline discomfort low | 13 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline discomfort medium | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline discomfort high | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week discomfort low | 13 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week discomfort high | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline sensory low | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline sensory medium | 5 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | Baseline sensory high | 8 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week sensory low | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Tolerability of Electrical Stimulation (NMES) | 6 week sensory medium | 3 Participants |
Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire
The Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ) measure avoidant behavior to physical activity or work due to fear of pain. The has two sub scales: physical activity and work. This FABQ consists of 16 items; 5 items for the physical activity sub scale and 11 items for the work subscale. Each item is scored from 0-6. Higher scores on the FABQ are indicative of greater fear and avoidance beliefs. The total score on the FABQ is 66, however, this score is considered separately. The FABQ-physical activity sub scale ranges from 0 - 24 points and the FABQ-work activity ranges from 0 - 42 points.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-PA Baseline | 12.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-W Baseline | 12.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-W 6 weeks | 8.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-PA 6 weeks | 8.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-W 6 weeks | 10.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-PA Baseline | 14.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-PA 6 weeks | 10.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire | FABQ-W Baseline | 11.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The NPRS measures pain intensity on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The higher the score the worst the pain intensity
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks (post-treatment) to 10 weeks (follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Baseline | 4.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | 6 weeks | 2.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | 10 weeks | 1.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Baseline | 4.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | 6 weeks | 2.34 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | 10 weeks | 2.34 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
Paraspinal Muscle Strength
The paraspinal muscle strength was assessed using the Biodex 3 Pro dynamometer (20 Ramsey Rd, Shirley, NY 11967). Active extension of the trunk was performed with the subject in a semi-standing position; the subject's hips were flexed at 60 degrees with the feet resting on an adjustable footrest. The thighs were secured to the seat with two Velcro straps. The scapulae rested against a roll that is attached to the chair arms. The trunk was secured with two Velcro straps that crossed the front trunk forming the shape of an X. The subject was asked to extend the trunk by exerting maximal isometric contraction for 5 seconds against the scapular roll. The average of three 5-second trials was recorded. All subjects received the same verbal instruction: Push your trunk against the scapular roll as strong as you can. The higher the score the stronger the muscles. The range starts from 0 without a limit to the amount of force that could be exerted.
Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Paraspinal Muscle Strength | Baseline | 117.29 Nm | Standard Deviation 57.7 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Paraspinal Muscle Strength | 6 weeks | 162.30 Nm | Standard Deviation 55.2 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Paraspinal Muscle Strength | Baseline | 154.49 Nm | Standard Deviation 59.1 |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Paraspinal Muscle Strength | 6 weeks | 175.80 Nm | Standard Deviation 58.4 |
Patient Satisfaction Survey
Satisfaction level with the interventions. Subjects were asked rate their satisfaction with the treatment by choosing one of the following statements: Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Unsatisfied Very unsatisfied
Time frame: only post-treatment at 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Satisfied | 3 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Unsatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Neutral | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Very Unsatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Very satisfied | 10 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Very Unsatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Very satisfied | 8 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Satisfied | 5 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Neutral | 0 Participants |
| Stabilization Exercises Plus Electrical Stimulation | Patient Satisfaction Survey | Unsatisfied | 0 Participants |