Skip to content

SCHEDULE Follow Up Visit 5-7 yr

5, 6 or 7 Year Follow-up Control After the SCHEDULE Study (SCANDINAVIAN HEART TRANSPLANT EVEROLIMUS DE NOVO STUDY WITH EARLY CNI AVOIDANCE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02864706
Acronym
CRAD001ANO05
Enrollment
95
Registered
2016-08-12
Start date
2016-01-18
Completion date
2017-09-25
Last updated
2019-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Transplantation

Keywords

allograft rejection, xenograft rejection, host vs graft disease, transplant

Brief summary

The major aim of this extension study was to evaluate the long-term effect (i.e. 5 to 7 years) of early initiation of everolimus and early elimination of CsA compared to standard immunosuppressive regimen including CsA on primary and secondary endpoints investigated in the SCHEDULE (NCT01266148) main study.

Detailed description

This protocol was written to describe the procedures for a single 5, 6 or 7 year follow-up control visit of patients who participated in the 12-month SCHEDULE (NCT01266148) study and the following 3-year follow-up examination/visit. The aim of this 5 to 7-year follow-up visit was to examine the effect of long term treatment, i.e. 5, 6 or 7 years, with early initiation of everolimus (Certican®) and early elimination of cyclosporine (CsA), compared to standard immunosuppressive regimen including CsA, on renal and heart function. During the time period of this follow-up examinations, this visit was performed as part of a routine annual visit 5, 6 or 7 years since transplantation (and inclusion in the original SCHEDULE study). Study code of SCHEDULE, the core study: CRAD001ANO02 (EudraCT No.: 2009-013074-41)

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

All patients, independent of their initial randomization in the core study, were followed up as in one single group Commercially available everolimus (Certican®), oral route, was used.

DRUGCyclosporine

Cyclosporine (CsA) control group target blood level: 150-350 ng/mL (month 1-3); 100-250 ng/mL (month 4-6); 60-200 ng/mL (month 7-12); everolimus group target blood level: 75-175 ng/mL (month 1-3)

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) target dose for control group: 2000-3000 mg/day everolimus group target dose: 1500-2000 mg/day and 75-175 ng/mL after week 11

DRUGCorticosteroids

Corticosteroids (CS) initiated at 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/day. Tapered to no less than 0.1 mg/kg at Month 3 for control and everolimus groups.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who participated in the SCHEDULE 12-month main study, and who completed the 3 year follow-up visit * Patients who are coming for a regular annual clinic visit 5 to 7 years after randomization in the main study * Obtaining of a separate signed patient informed consent will be required for participation in this follow-up examination.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a retransplanted heart since the original SCHEDULE study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)at the 5-7 year follow-up visitRenal function as assessed by measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) (Cr-EDTA or iohexol clearance). Baseline Visit 1 and Patient 4252 excluded from the intent treat analysis set.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With Incidence of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)at the 5-7 year follow-upCardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) was defined as mean maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥0.5 mm, measured for the entire matched pullback recording by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The incidence of CAV at 5-7 years was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification according to baseline distribution of CAV incidence.
Myocardial Structure and Functionwithin 5-7 yearsMyocardial structure and function by echocardiography assessment measured by ventricular end systolic diameter.
Quality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upat the 5-7 year visitThis Quality of life Short Form Survey with 36 items (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire)was administered to patients pre-transplantation and after transplantation at the 5-7 year visit. This data represents the change. The survey consist of scores on a scale. Each form is scaled from 0 t 100. 0 = maximum disability and 100 equals no disability.
Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) Recorded by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)within 5-7 yearsCardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) was defined as mean maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥0.5 mm, measured for the entire matched pullback recording by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The incidence of CAV at 5-7 years was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification according to baseline distribution of CAV incidence.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)baseline, at the 5-7 year visitChange in visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to the 5 to 7 Year follow up visit. 0 is no pain; and 10 is the worst possible pain
Number of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)at the 5-7 year visitBeck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score has the following categories of depression. Normal, Mild, Moderate Severe and Missing.
Change From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5DBaseline, 5-7 year visitChange from baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5D from 3 Year Follow-Up to 5 to 7 Year Follow-Up Baseline Visit 1 (ITT Set) Euro Quality of Life 5D (EQ-5D): is a descriptive system of healthrelated quality of life states consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) each of which can be assessed as one of three levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems). A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-scale is also included in the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D index is calculated based on the United Kingdom Time Trade-Off (TTO) N3 value set which converts the five dimensions scores into a single measure with a possible range from -0.163 (worst possible health state) to +1 (perfect health). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in Quality of Life.

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In total, 95 patients (48 everolimus, 47 controls), attended the follow-up visit at 5-7 years post-transplant and were included in the safety population The PP population (27 everolimus, 35 controls) excluded 7 patients in the everolimus group and 11 in the control group who discontinued study drug prematurely

Pre-assignment details

Two patients randomized to everolimus did not provide a month 12 measured GFR (mGFR) value and were excluded from the ITT population, which thus comprised 93 patients (46 everolimus, 47 controls).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus
patients received everolimus (Certican), low-exposure CsA (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids with CsA withdrawal after 7-11 weeks
48
Control
patients received standard CsA, MMF and corticosteroids
47
Total95

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalEverolimus
Age, Continuous52.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61
51.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.53
50.13 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.43
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants91 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants25 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants70 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 484 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 4818 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)

Renal function as assessed by measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) (Cr-EDTA or iohexol clearance). Baseline Visit 1 and Patient 4252 excluded from the intent treat analysis set.

Time frame: at the 5-7 year follow-up visit

Population: intent to treat. 1 patient was excluded from ITT due to missing mGFR.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusMeasured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)74.7 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 23.3
ControlMeasured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)62.4 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 16.5
p-value: 0.0043ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5D

Change from baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5D from 3 Year Follow-Up to 5 to 7 Year Follow-Up Baseline Visit 1 (ITT Set) Euro Quality of Life 5D (EQ-5D): is a descriptive system of healthrelated quality of life states consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) each of which can be assessed as one of three levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems). A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-scale is also included in the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D index is calculated based on the United Kingdom Time Trade-Off (TTO) N3 value set which converts the five dimensions scores into a single measure with a possible range from -0.163 (worst possible health state) to +1 (perfect health). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in Quality of Life.

Time frame: Baseline, 5-7 year visit

Population: intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusChange From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5D0.2323 scores on the scaleStandard Deviation 0.3849
ControlChange From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5D0.2982 scores on the scaleStandard Deviation 0.3274
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Change in visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to the 5 to 7 Year follow up visit. 0 is no pain; and 10 is the worst possible pain

Time frame: baseline, at the 5-7 year visit

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)35.6 mmStandard Deviation 26.9
ControlChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS)34.0 mmStandard Deviation 32
Secondary

Myocardial Structure and Function

Myocardial structure and function by echocardiography assessment measured by ventricular end systolic diameter.

Time frame: within 5-7 years

Population: intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusMyocardial Structure and FunctionLVESD (left ventricular end systolic diameter)3.1 cmStandard Deviation 0.8
EverolimusMyocardial Structure and FunctionLVEDD (left ventricular end diastolic diameter)4.7 cmStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlMyocardial Structure and FunctionLVESD (left ventricular end systolic diameter)3.1 cmStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlMyocardial Structure and FunctionLVEDD (left ventricular end diastolic diameter)4.9 cmStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Number of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score has the following categories of depression. Normal, Mild, Moderate Severe and Missing.

Time frame: at the 5-7 year visit

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Mild6 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Severe1 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Moderate2 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Missing3 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Normal15 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Missing5 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Normal13 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Mild4 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Moderate5 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Severe0 Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Incidence of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) was defined as mean maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥0.5 mm, measured for the entire matched pullback recording by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The incidence of CAV at 5-7 years was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification according to baseline distribution of CAV incidence.

Time frame: at the 5-7 year follow-up

Population: Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusPercent of Participants With Incidence of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)53 percent of participants
ControlPercent of Participants With Incidence of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)74 percent of participants
Secondary

Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) Recorded by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) was defined as mean maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥0.5 mm, measured for the entire matched pullback recording by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The incidence of CAV at 5-7 years was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification according to baseline distribution of CAV incidence.

Time frame: within 5-7 years

Population: Intent to Treat.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusProgression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) Recorded by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)0.13 mmStandard Deviation 0.15
ControlProgression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) Recorded by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)0.23 mmStandard Deviation 0.24
p-value: 0.037Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Quality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-up

This Quality of life Short Form Survey with 36 items (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire)was administered to patients pre-transplantation and after transplantation at the 5-7 year visit. This data represents the change. The survey consist of scores on a scale. Each form is scaled from 0 t 100. 0 = maximum disability and 100 equals no disability.

Time frame: at the 5-7 year visit

Population: intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upPhysical Health Summary16.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upMental Health Summary10.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upPhysical Functioning36.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.4
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upRole Physical50.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.3
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upBodily Pain10.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.8
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upGeneral Health25.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upVitality30.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upSocial Functioning39.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.5
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upRole Emotional23.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.7
EverolimusQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upMental Health8.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upSocial Functioning43.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.4
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upPhysical Health Summary13.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upGeneral Health23.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upMental Health Summary15.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upMental Health14.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upPhysical Functioning40.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.4
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upVitality28.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upRole Physical55.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.4
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upRole Emotional42.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.5
ControlQuality of Life by SF-36 Change From Pre-transplantation to 5-7 Year Follow-upBodily Pain7.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026