Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Microprocessor Controlled and Carbon Fiber Prosthetic Feet in Transtibial Amputees

Comparative Effectiveness of Microprocessor Controlled and Carbon Fiber Energy Storing and Returning Prosthetic Feet in Persons With Unilateral Transtibial Amputation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02864693
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-08-12
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2018-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation

Keywords

Microprocessor Controlled Ankle, Transtibial Amputee, Pacifica LP, Kinnex

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to evaluate benefits of a microprocessor controlled prosthetic ankle-foot device compared to a non-microprocessor controlled or passive carbon fiber prosthetic ankle-foot device.

Detailed description

Recent advancements in microprocessor controlled prosthetic ankle-foot systems have allowed additional functionality for the lower limb amputee, but research into the effectiveness of microprocessor controlled ankle-foot systems has been limited. In this research study, differences in perceived mobility, functional capabilities and gait parameters between energy storing and returning and microprocessor controlled ankle-foot mechanisms will be identified where they exist. Also a comparison of the initial function with a new system compared to the function after a four week accommodation period will provide insight into the time it takes for the prosthesis user to experience a benefit from a microprocessor ankle-foot.

Interventions

DEVICEKinnex

The Kinnex is a microprocessor controlled hydraulic ankle foot device (Freedom Innovations, Irvine, CA).

DEVICEPacifica LP

The Pacifica LP is a carbon-fiber ankle foot device (Freedom Innovations, Irvine, CA)

Sponsors

Ability Prosthetics and Orthotics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral transtibial amputation * Age 18-99 years old * Body weight below 275 lbs * Non-pregnant * English speaking * Current user of prosthesis for at least one year * Wear time 8 hrs/day or more * MFCL ≥ K-3 * Well-fitting and functioning prosthesis * No use of ambulatory aide * Able to tolerate testing protocol * Able to walk on slopes * Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be willing and able to complete all aspects of the study, adhere to the study visit schedule and comply with the assessments

Exclusion criteria

* Amputation level other than unilateral transtibial * Age \<18 or \>99 years old * Body weight above 275 lbs * Pregnant * Non-English speaking * Not current user of prosthesis * Less than one year use of prosthesis * Wear time less than 8 hr/day * MFCL \<K3 * Poor fitting and functioning prosthesis * Indicating that the socket fit is painful, or unacceptable * Use of ambulatory aide * Unable to tolerate testing protocol * Unable to walk on slopes * Presence or history of any condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study * Any neurologic impairments known to cause gait and/or balance dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2 Dimensional Video Motion Analysis (2D Video Analysis) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeks2D Video Analysis will be used to measure knee and ankle angles at mid-stance of gait while walking up and down the sloped ramp and also while standing still on level ground.
L-Functional Test (L-Test) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeksThe L-test is a timed functional test that involves standing from a chair, walking 3 meters, turning around and sitting back into the chair.
5 times Sit-to-Stand (5 times STS) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeksThe 5 times STS is a timed functional test that measures how long it takes to stand and sit five times in a row from a chair.
6 minute Timed Walk Test (6m TWT) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeksThe 6m TWT involves walking as far as possible along a straight path between two cones in under 6 minutes.
Physiological Cost Index (PCI) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeksThe PCI is calculated by subtracting resting heart rate from active heart rate following a walking test, and dividing the difference by the walking speed.
Hill Assessment Index (HAI) after 4 weeksCollection after 4 weeksThe HAI is a functional test that measures quality of walking up and down a sloped ramp.
Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPPRO)Collection at baselineThe AMPPRO is a functional test consisting of 21 tasks that are similar to everyday function to test balance, strength and walking ability
L-Functional Test (L-Test) BaselineCollection at baselineThe L-test is a timed functional test that involves standing from a chair, walking 3 meters, turning around and sitting back into the chair.
5 times Sit-to-Stand (5 times STS) BaselineCollection at baselineThe 5 times STS is a timed functional test that measures how long it takes to stand and sit five times in a row from a chair.
6 minute Timed Walk Test (6m TWT) BaselineCollection at baselineThe 6m TWT involves walking as far as possible along a straight path between two cones in under 6 minutes.
Physiological Cost Index (PCI) BaselineCollection at baselineThe PCI is calculated by subtracting resting heart rate from active heart rate following a walking test, and dividing the difference by the walking speed.
Hill Assessment Index (HAI) BaselineCollection at baselineThe HAI is a functional test that measures quality of walking up and down a sloped ramp.
2 Dimensional Video Motion Analysis (2D Video Analysis) BaselineCollection at baseline2D Video Analysis will be used to measure knee and ankle angles at mid-stance of gait while walking up and down the sloped ramp and also while standing still on level ground.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire - Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS)Collection after 4 weeksThe PEQ-MS is a self-reported questionnaire that measures perceived difficulty ambulating on a variety of environmental barriers
Prosthesis Limb User Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)Collection after 4 weeksThe PLUS-M is a self-reported questionnaire that measures perceived mobility with a prosthesis in different environments.
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)Collection after 4 weeksThe ABC is a self-reported questionnaire that measures confidence in balance while performing various activities in different environments.
Socket Comfort Score (SCS)Collection at baseline and after 4 weeksThe SCS is a self-reported questionnaire that asks the participant to rate their current socket comfort from 0-10, with 10 points representing the most comfortable socket they can imagine.
Orthotic Prosthetic User Survey (OPUS)Collection after 4 weeksThe OPUS is a self-reported questionnaire that asks about satisfaction with device

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026