Skip to content

Effectiveness of Echogenic and Nonechogenic Needles in Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Role of Echogenic Versus Nonechogenic Needles in Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success Rate: A Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02862041
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-08-10
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Extremity Injury Trauma

Brief summary

In this prospective, randomized, double blinded study, the needle tip and needle shaft visibility of echogenic and nonechogenic needle were compared in ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sixty patients scheduled for upper extremity surgery were included in the study. Patients were randomised into two groups, group E (Echogenic) and group NE (Nonechogenic) with 30 subjects in each group. Under ultrasound guidance infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed. In Group E, Pajunk Sonoplex echogenic needle was used and in Group NE, Stimuplex Braun nonechogenic needle was used. The subjective assessment for needle tip/shaft visibility as scored by the performer and the objective assessment from the recorded block procedure video were noted.

Detailed description

The aim of the investigators study was to find out the better among the echogenic and nonechogenic needle in needle tip/shaft visibility and the block success rate in ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sixty patients were randomized into two groups, Group E (echogenic group) and Group NE (nonechogenic group) with thirty patients in each group. The ultrasound imaging of each nerve block was video recorded for later analysis. Recording commenced from skin puncture and stopped at the time of final needle removal (total block time). After each block the performer was asked to subjectively score the percentage time he had visualized the needle tip and needle shaft on a 5 point scale (1 = 0%-20%, 2 = 20%-40%, 3 = 40%- 60%, 4 = 60%-80%, 5 = 80%-100%). The recorded video was later analysed by an investigator. An objective measurement of percentage needle tip visibility and needle shaft visibility was calculated for each nerve block using the formula, Time in view (needle tip) / total block time x 100 Time in view (needle shaft) / total block time x 100 The subjective assessment for needle tip/shaft visibility as scored by the performer and the objective assessment from the recorded block procedure video were noted. Other block parameters were also compared.

Interventions

DEVICEEchogenic needle - Pajunk sonoplex echogenic needle

Ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgeries

DEVICENon Echogenic needle - Stimuplex Braun Nonechogenic needle

Ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgeries

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-60 years, both male and female scheduled for upper extremity surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant coagulopathy * Local anesthetic allergy * Preexisting motor or sensory deficit in the operative limb * Uncontrolled hypertension and unstable Ischemic Heart disease * Body mass index \> 35 * Patients who needs general anaesthesia for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Needle tip and shaft visibilityDuration of Block procedurePercentage Needle Tip & shaft visibility calculated using the formula - Time in view (needle tip or shaft) / total block time\*100

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to onset of sensory blockade0- 15minutes. Time (Minutes) between finishing injection of Local anaesthetic and to no response to pin prick test.
Time to onset of motor blockade0- 20 minutes. Time (Minutes) between finishing injection of Local anaesthetic and onset of full paralysis.
Duration of block procedure5- 15 minutes. Start of skin puncture till the final needle removal
Duration of motor blockade0- 5 hours. Time (Hours) between the full paralysis and recovery of motor functions.
Block success rate of echogenic and Nonechogenic group.Duration of surgery
Duration of sensory blockade0- 6 hours. Time (Hours) between the block completion and the first pain postoperatively.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026