Skip to content

Economic Evaluation of the Use of Plerixafor for Autologous HSC Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Economic Evaluation of the Use of Plerixafor for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02861287
Acronym
PLERIXAFOR
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-08-10
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

This study aims to realize an economic evaluation of the introduction of Plerixafor in addition to G-CSF and alternative options, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who failed or insufficiently mobilize peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells in response to G-CSF alone.

Interventions

OTHEREconomic evaluation

Sponsors

Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma who were eligible for high-dose melphalan supported with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as part of their treatment plan * First mobilization attempt * rhG-CSF alone mobilization regimen * Failed mobilization as documented by an increase in CD34+ cell mobilization deemed insufficient to initiate apheresis (below 15/µL), after the 4 first injections of rhG-CSF that are administered in the evening

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years; * Primary diagnosis other than MM * 2nd or subsequent mobilization attempt * Patients who previously received HDCT + autologous HSCT * Chemotherapy-based mobilization regimen * Efficient mobilization, allowing for apheresis and collection of the target cell number (5x106 CD34+ cells/kg for every planned autologous transplantation as per institutional SOPs).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost-effectiveness analysis1 yearThe cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using the collection of a transplantable graft as effectiveness criteria; the suitability of collected cell products for transplantation will be judged as per institutional criteria. Direct medical costs will be estimated by micro-costing, i.e. by measuring physical quantities (capital and labor) consumed for each patient and attributing corresponding monetary costs on the basis of average French prices. Costs (including room - inpatient and outpatient, drugs and laboratory tests) will be estimated on the basis of patients' medical records.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026