Skip to content

Fractional Microplasma Radiofrequency Technology for Non-hypertrophic Post-burn Scars in Asians: A Prospective Study of 95 Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02861248
Enrollment
95
Registered
2016-08-10
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2016-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix

Keywords

Burn Scar, Micro-plasma Radiofrequency Therapy

Brief summary

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMRT for treating non-hypertrophic post-burn scars in an Asian population.

Detailed description

Background: Laser therapy is an emerging, minimally invasive treatment for scars. Among the various techniques, fractional microplasma radiofrequency technology (FMRT) has proved to be effective for various types of scars and skin conditions such as rhytids, striae distensae, and hyperpigmentation. Method: A prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMRT for treating non-hypertrophic post-burn scars in an Asian population. All patients underwent three to five treatment sessions at intervals of 8-16 weeks. The patient and observer scar assessment scales (POSAS) were use to evaluate changes in the burn scars before and after treatment. Intermediate and long-term adverse events were recorded for outcome analysis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFractional micro-plasma radiofrequency treatment

After the patient's scars were subjected to a mild cleanser and 70% alcohol, a topical cream of 5% lidocaine hydrochloric acid (Beijing Ziguang Medication Manufacture Corporation Ltd, Beijing, China) was applied to the entire scar surface under occlusion for 60-90 min before treatment to achieve local anesthesia. Fractional micro-plasma radiofrequency treatment (Pixel RF, Accent XL; Alma Lasers, Caesarea, Israel) was applied using a roller tip at 50-80 watts. Three or four passes were made in different directions over each affected area. A high rolling speed of roughly 5 cm/s was manually controlled. This treatment was accompanied by an air cooler (Cryo 5; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) for pain control. All patients attended three to five treatment sessions at intervals of 8-16 weeks.

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with ≥1-year-old non-hypertrophic burn scars

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy or breastfeeding * history of hypertrophic scars or keloids * abnormal medical examination including routine blood count, liver and kidney functions and immune function * history of treatment including surgery, dermabrasion, laser treatment within the past 6 months * the presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other metallic implant near the treatment site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
POSAS scoreFrom baseline to 6 months after final treatmentThe patient component of the POSAS contains six parameters that the patient scores: pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, relief. The physician (observer) component contains five parameters: vascularization, pigmentation, pliability, thickness, relief. Each parameter is scored from 1 to 10, with 1 indicating that the scar similar to normal skin and 10 indicating the worst situation imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComplicationsFrom baseline to 6 months after final treatmentComplication including edema, erythema, infection, dyschromia, hypertrophic scar formation or any other complications reported

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026