Skip to content

A Study of Ocrelizumab in Participants With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Who Have Had a Suboptimal Response to an Adequate Course of Disease-Modifying Treatment (DMT)

An Open-Label Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Who Have A Suboptimal Response to an Adequate Course of Disease-Modifying Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02861014
Enrollment
681
Registered
2016-08-10
Start date
2016-09-09
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2022-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Brief summary

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, open-label, efficacy, and safety study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in participants with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who have had a suboptimal response to an adequate course of a Disease-Modifying Treatment (DMT). The study will consist of a Screening period (up to 4 weeks), an Open-label treatment period (96 weeks; with last dose administered at Week 72), and a Follow-up period of at least 2 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALOcrelizumab

Ocrelizumab will be administered as two 300 mg IV infusions on Days 1 and 15 followed by one 600 mg IV infusions administered at Weeks 24, 48, and 72.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a definite diagnosis of RRMS, confirmed as per the revised McDonald 2010 criteria * Have a length of disease duration, from first symptom, of less than (\<) 10 years * Have received no more than two prior DMTs, and the discontinuation of the most recent DMT was due to lack of efficacy * Suboptimal disease control while on a DMT * Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 0.0 to 4.0, inclusive, at Screening * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to use an acceptable birth control method during the treatment period and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) or history of primary progressive or progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) * Inability to complete an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) procedure * Known presence of other neurological disorders * Any concomitant disease that may require chronic treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants during the course of the study * History or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies * History of opportunistic infections * History or known presence of recurrent or chronic infection * History of malignancy * Congestive heart failure * Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial infection or other infection, excluding fungal infection of nail beds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as Per Protocol Defined Events During a 96-Week PeriodWeek 96A protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 48 Weeks PeriodBaseline up to 48 weeksA protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan
Time to First Protocol-Defined Event of Disease ActivityBaseline up to 96 WeeksThe definition of a protocol-defined event of disease activity is the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse defined as: Symptoms must persist for \>24 hours and should not be attributable to confounding clinical factors; Symptoms should be preceded by neurological stability for at least 30 days; Symptoms should be accompanied by new objective neurological worsening determined with a timely EDSS/ Functional Systems Score (FSS) assessment * 24 weeks confirmed disability progression based on increases in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan.
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Baseline, Weeks: 24, 48, 72, 96The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.
Absolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96Up to Week 96The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline EDSS Score ≥2 With CDI at Week 96Week 96The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.
Annualized Protocol-defined Relapse Rate at Week 96Week 96
Time to Onset of 24-week Confirmed Disability ProgressionBaseline up to 96 Weeks
Time to Onset of First Protocol-Defined RelapseBaseline up to 96 WeeksA protocol-defined multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is an occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS that meets the following criteria: * Symptoms must persist for \>24 hours and should not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, adverse reactions to medications) * Symptoms should be preceded by neurological stability for at least 30 days * Symptoms should be accompanied by new objective neurological worsening determined with a timely EDSS/ Functional Systems Score (FSS) assessment, consistent with an increase of at least: * ≥ 0.5 points on EDSS scale * or ≥ 2 points on one of the following FSS scales: pyramidal, ambulation, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, or visual * or ≥ 1 point on two or more of the following FSS scales: pyramidal, ambulation, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, or visual
Time to Onset of First New and/or Enlarging T2 LesionBaseline up to 96 Weeks
Mean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Weeks: 24, 48, 96Mean number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions per MRI scan: Total number of T1 Gd-enhanced lesions divided by the total number of interpretable MRI scans
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI FromBaseline, Week 96
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRIBaseline, Week 96
Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 24 Weeks PeriodBaseline up to 24 weeksA protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI ScanWeeks 24, 48, 96Mean number of new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per MRI scan: Total number of new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions divided by the total number of interpretable MRI scans
Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeeks 48, 96
Percentage Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeeks 48, 96
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeeks 48, 96
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain VolumeWeeks 24, 48, 96
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Cortical Grey Matter VolumeWeeks 48, 96
Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in White Matter VolumeWeeks 48, 96
Mean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreBaseline, Weeks: 48, 96Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT) is assessing processing speed/working memory. The SDMT presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a standard sheet of paper. Participants are asked to voice the digit associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible for 90 sec. There is a single outcome measure - the number correct over the 90 sec time span. The higher the results, the better processing speed/working memory.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 48, 96Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is assessing visuospatial memory. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. There are three learning trials, and the outcome measure is the total number of points earned over the three learning trials, thus the scale range is 0-36. The higher the result, the better visual/spatial memory.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 48, 96Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT) is assessing processing speed/working memory. The SDMT presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a standard sheet of paper. Participants are asked to voice the digit associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible for 90 sec. There is a single outcome measure - the number correct over the 90 sec time span.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreBaseline, Weeks: 48, 96Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is assessing visuospatial memory. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. There are three learning trials, and the outcome measure is the total number of points earned over the three learning trials, thus the scale range is 0-36. The higher the result, the better visual/spatial memory.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to to 96 weeks after the end of the Treatment Period
Volume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96Weeks 24, 48, 96The number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions at week 24, 48 and 96 is calculated as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging lesions at each visit. Data from other unscheduled assessments is included in this summary or analysis.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

One additional participant was initially enrolled in error and the information provided is based on the ITT population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ocrelizumab
Participants received Ocrelizumab as two 300 mg IV infusions on Days 1 and 15 followed by one 600 mg IV infusions administered at Weeks 24, 48, and 72.
680
Total680

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Primary AnalysisAdverse Event7
Primary AnalysisCommercial ocrelizumab3
Primary AnalysisDeath1
Primary AnalysisLack of Efficacy3
Primary AnalysisPhysician Decision2
Primary AnalysisPregnancy4
Primary AnalysisProtocol Violation2
Primary AnalysisStudy Terminated By Sponsor3
Primary AnalysisWithdrawal by Subject14
Safety Follow-upAdverse Event1
Safety Follow-upCommercial ocrelizumab36
Safety Follow-upPhysician Decision1
Safety Follow-upPregnancy1
Safety Follow-upRoll-over to a long term extension study1
Safety Follow-upStudy terminated by sponsor1
Safety Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOcrelizumab
Age, Continuous34.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
579 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
74 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
625 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
436 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
244 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 6800 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
531 / 68014 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 6806 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as Per Protocol Defined Events During a 96-Week Period

A protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan

Time frame: Week 96

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as Per Protocol Defined Events During a 96-Week Period74.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96

The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.

Time frame: Up to Week 96

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96Worsened (>0.5)13.4 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96Stable (Change <= 0.5 and >= -0.5)72.2 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in EDSS Category at Week 96Improved (<-0.5)14.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 48-461.8 mL
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 96-576.5 mL
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain Volume

Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain VolumeWeek 24-0.153 Mean percentage change from baseline
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain VolumeWeek 48-0.445 Mean percentage change from baseline
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Brain VolumeWeek 96-0.805 Mean percentage change from baseline
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Cortical Grey Matter Volume

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Cortical Grey Matter VolumeWeek 48-0.312 Mean percentage change from baseline
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Cortical Grey Matter VolumeWeek 96-0.618 Mean percentage change from baseline
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in White Matter Volume

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in White Matter VolumeWeek 48-0.382 Mean percentage change from baseline
OcrelizumabAdjusted Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in White Matter VolumeWeek 96-0.745 Mean percentage change from baseline
Secondary

Annualized Protocol-defined Relapse Rate at Week 96

Time frame: Week 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabAnnualized Protocol-defined Relapse Rate at Week 960.030 Relapses per participant per year
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 48-416.5 mLStandard Deviation 1224.3
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 96-528.5 mLStandard Deviation 1144.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Score

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is assessing visuospatial memory. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. There are three learning trials, and the outcome measure is the total number of points earned over the three learning trials, thus the scale range is 0-36. The higher the result, the better visual/spatial memory.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreWeek 96-1.5 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreBaseline25.0 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreWeek 48-1.9 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks: 24, 48, 72, 96

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 72-0.03 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 96-0.01 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Baseline2.09 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 24-0.02 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Week 480.01 Points on scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI From

Time frame: Baseline, Week 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabChange From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI From-558.6 mLStandard Deviation 1194.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Score

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT) is assessing processing speed/working memory. The SDMT presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a standard sheet of paper. Participants are asked to voice the digit associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible for 90 sec. There is a single outcome measure - the number correct over the 90 sec time span. The higher the results, the better processing speed/working memory.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks: 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabMean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreBaseline53.8 Correct responses over 90 secondsStandard Deviation 13
OcrelizumabMean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreWeek 482.5 Correct responses over 90 secondsStandard Deviation 9.8
OcrelizumabMean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreWeek 961.3 Correct responses over 90 secondsStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI Scan

Mean number of new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per MRI scan: Total number of new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions divided by the total number of interpretable MRI scans

Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI ScanWeek 240.053 Lesions per scan
OcrelizumabMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI ScanWeek 480.009 Lesions per scan
OcrelizumabMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Per MRI ScanWeek 960.011 Lesions per scan
Secondary

Mean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96

Mean number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions per MRI scan: Total number of T1 Gd-enhanced lesions divided by the total number of interpretable MRI scans

Time frame: Weeks: 24, 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
OcrelizumabMean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Week 240.004 Lesions per scan
OcrelizumabMean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Week 480.004 Lesions per scan
OcrelizumabMean Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Week 96NA Lesions per scan
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion Volume

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 48-4.0 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 149.7
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline at Week 48 and 96 in T1 Hypointense Lesion VolumeWeek 96-12.5 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 21.1
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Score

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT) is assessing processing speed/working memory. The SDMT presents a series of nine symbols, each paired with a single digit in a key at the top of a standard sheet of paper. Participants are asked to voice the digit associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible for 90 sec. There is a single outcome measure - the number correct over the 90 sec time span.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreWeek 964.8 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 30.6
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Processing Speed/Working Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) ScoreWeek 487.2 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 30.8
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Score

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is assessing cognitive processing speed and verbal and visual memory. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is assessing visuospatial memory. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. There are three learning trials, and the outcome measure is the total number of points earned over the three learning trials, thus the scale range is 0-36. The higher the result, the better visual/spatial memory.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks: 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreWeek 48-4.4 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 31.1
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance (Visuospatial Memory) at Week 48 and Week 96 as Measured by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS - Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) ScoreWeek 96-2.0 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 33.7
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI

Time frame: Baseline, Week 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabPercentage Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total T2 Lesion Volume Detected by Brain MRI-8.5 Percentage Change From BaselineStandard Deviation 18.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 24 Weeks Period

A protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 24 Weeks Period87.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 48 Weeks Period

A protocol-defined event of disease activity was defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse (PDR) * 24-week CDP based on increase in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan

Time frame: Baseline up to 48 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants Free From a Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity During 48 Weeks Period82.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Baseline EDSS Score ≥2 With CDI at Week 96

The EDSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurologic examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With a Baseline EDSS Score ≥2 With CDI at Week 9617.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Time frame: Baseline up to to 96 weeks after the end of the Treatment Period

Population: Safety analyses were done on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Malignancies0.4 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs leading to study drug discontinuation0.7 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Pregnancies0.7 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Infusion-related reactions (IRRs)43.2 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE89.1 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs leading to study drug discontinuation1.0 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE7.2 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious IRRs0.1 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Deaths0.1 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious infections1.6 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Infections66.9 Percentage of Participants
OcrelizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs leading to dose modification/interruptionb15.0 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Infections28.1 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs leading to study drug discontinuationNA Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs leading to study drug discontinuationNA Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs leading to dose modification/interruptionbNA Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Infusion-related reactions (IRRs)0 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious infections0 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Malignancies0 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Pregnancies1.5 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE57.8 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE9.4 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious IRRs0 Percentage of Participants
Ocrelizumab Safety Follow-upPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Deaths0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Time to First Protocol-Defined Event of Disease Activity

The definition of a protocol-defined event of disease activity is the occurrence of at least one of the following while on treatment with ocrelizumab: * A protocol-defined relapse defined as: Symptoms must persist for \>24 hours and should not be attributable to confounding clinical factors; Symptoms should be preceded by neurological stability for at least 30 days; Symptoms should be accompanied by new objective neurological worsening determined with a timely EDSS/ Functional Systems Score (FSS) assessment * 24 weeks confirmed disability progression based on increases in EDSS while on treatment with ocrelizumab * A T1 Gd-enhanced lesion after Week 8 * A new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI after Week 8 compared to the Week 8 MRI scan.

Time frame: Baseline up to 96 Weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OcrelizumabTime to First Protocol-Defined Event of Disease ActivityNA Weeks
Secondary

Time to Onset of 24-week Confirmed Disability Progression

Time frame: Baseline up to 96 Weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OcrelizumabTime to Onset of 24-week Confirmed Disability ProgressionNA Weeks
Secondary

Time to Onset of First New and/or Enlarging T2 Lesion

Time frame: Baseline up to 96 Weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OcrelizumabTime to Onset of First New and/or Enlarging T2 LesionNA Weeks
Secondary

Time to Onset of First Protocol-Defined Relapse

A protocol-defined multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse is an occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS that meets the following criteria: * Symptoms must persist for \>24 hours and should not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, adverse reactions to medications) * Symptoms should be preceded by neurological stability for at least 30 days * Symptoms should be accompanied by new objective neurological worsening determined with a timely EDSS/ Functional Systems Score (FSS) assessment, consistent with an increase of at least: * ≥ 0.5 points on EDSS scale * or ≥ 2 points on one of the following FSS scales: pyramidal, ambulation, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, or visual * or ≥ 1 point on two or more of the following FSS scales: pyramidal, ambulation, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, or visual

Time frame: Baseline up to 96 Weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all participants from the ITT population excluding participants with both screening and the baseline EDSS scores missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
OcrelizumabTime to Onset of First Protocol-Defined RelapseNA Weeks
Secondary

Volume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96

The number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions at week 24, 48 and 96 is calculated as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging lesions at each visit. Data from other unscheduled assessments is included in this summary or analysis.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 48, 96

Population: All enrolled participants who received any dose of ocrelizumab were included in the ITT population. Participants who prematurely withdrew from the study for any reason and who did not perform any assessment for any reason were also included in the ITT population. Here number of analyzed participants represents participants with data available at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcrelizumabVolume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96Week 2421.4 uLStandard Deviation 241.7
OcrelizumabVolume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96Week 4823.1 uLStandard Deviation 510.2
OcrelizumabVolume of New and/or Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Volume of Lesions Per MRI Scan at Weeks 24, 48, 96Week 963.7 uLStandard Deviation 41.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026