Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide in the Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity After Craniopharyngioma Therapy

Multicentre Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide in the Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity After Craniopharyngioma Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02860923
Acronym
CRANIOEXE
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-08-09
Start date
2017-01-11
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Craniopharyngiomas, Hypothalamic Obesity

Keywords

glucagon-like peptide-1, exenatide, placebo, multicenter trial

Brief summary

This hypothalamic obesity is associated with serious metabolic and psychosocial consequences. The purpose of the study is to compare the change of body weight after 6 months treatment with a lifestyle intervention + exenatide compare to the one after the same lifestyle intervention+ placebo in adults patients suffering from a hypothalamic obesity due to treatment of craniopharyngioma.

Detailed description

The development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues might be a solution since native GLP-1 suppresses appetite and energy intake in both normal weight and obese individuals as well as in people with type 2 diabetes and delays gastric emptying. The underlying mechanisms that mediate the effects of weight involve not only central regions like the hypothalamus and the solitary tractus nucleus and area postrema but also peripheral regions as the gastrointestinal tract. These extra hypothalamic effects are of particular interest in the cases of obesity due to hypothalamic lesions. Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue with a high structural homology to human GLP-1, a gut derived incretin hormone. Since exenatide causes a dose-dependent weight loss, decreasing concentration of glycosylated haemoglobin as well as improving ß-cell function and systolic blood pressure, it could be an attractive treatment for both type 2 diabetes and obesity. In a double-blind placebo-controlled 24-week trial, it has been recently shown that non diabetic obese patients maintained on exenatide 10µg x 2/j lost significantly more weight than did those on placebo (5.1 kg versus 1.6).

Interventions

DRUGExenatide
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* They are between 18 and 75 yrs. * They had been diagnosed with a craniopharyngioma treated by surgery and/or irradiation without sign of recurrence. * They have a BMI upper than 30kg/m² with intractable weight gain following therapy for craniopharyngioma. * They demonstrate at least one other endocrinopathy, as a marker of hypothalamic damage. * All pituitary deficiencies are correctly treated. * They gave their written, informed consent before the beginning of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* They have type 1 diabetes. * They have type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. * Acidocetosis. * Bariatric surgery * Previous personal history of thyroid or pancreatic cancer. * Hypercalcitoninemia. * They have been previously treated by GLP1 analogs. * Hypertriglyceridemia upper than 5g/l * They had previously demonstrated voluntary weight loss during the three previous months. * They are under the age of 18 years or over the age of 65 yrs. * They are maintained on medical treatment against obesity. * They are receiving supraphysiologic hydrocortisone therapy (upper than 30 mg/jour). * Their GH status change during the course of the study. * Exenatide is contraindicated. * Psychological and/or medical problems that would create difficulties for the patient to comply with the study protocol are present.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare body weight change thanks to weighing machinebaseline and 6 monthsThe primary outcome will be assessed by a weighing machine that measure until 200 kg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment tolerance thanks to digestive parameters6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of: \- Nauseas, vomiting.
Treatment tolerance thanks to dermatologic parameter6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of: \- Injection-site symptoms.
Treatment tolerance thanks to pulse rate6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of : \- Increasing of pulse rate.
Treatment tolerance thanks to Beck scale6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of : \- Anxiety by Beck scale.
Treatment tolerance thanks to HAD scale6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of : \- depression evaluated by HAD scale.
Treatment tolerance thanks to enzymatic parameters6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of : \- Increasing of pancreatic enzymes.
Treatment tolerance thanks to glycemia parameter6 monthsTolerance will be assessed by the presence of : \- Hypoglycaemia
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to glucose profil6 monthsLevels of blood glucose and insulin, oral glucose tolerance testing, haemoglobin A1C
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to lipid profil6 monthsLevels of HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol.
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to metabolic parameters6 monthsThe metabolic parameters considered: \- Body composition (Dual energy-ray absorptiometry) and abdominal obesity (waist circumference).
Assess eating behaviour thanks to physiological parameters6 monthsThe eating behaviour will be evaluated by: \- Plasma level of ghrelin measured after an overnight fast.
Assess eating behaviour thanks to energy intake6 months
Assess eating behaviour thanks to Three factor eating6 monthsThe eating behaviour will be evaluated by: \- Scores of restriction, hunger and disinhibition (French version of the Three factor Eating Questionnaire).
Assess eating behaviour thanks to visual analogic scales6 monthsThe eating behaviour will be evaluated by: \- Scores of desire to eat, hunger and fullness at visual analogic scales.
Assess quality of life thanks to Beck questionnaire6 monthsThe quality of life will be assessed by: \- Scores of depression (short questionnaire of Beck).
Assess quality of life thanks to ORWELL questionnaire6 monthsThe quality of life will be assessed by: \- Scores of quality of life (ORWELL questionnaire).
Assess energy expenditure thanks to physical activity6 monthsThe energy expenditure will be estimated thanks to pedometer. \- Resting metabolic rate (indirect calorimetry).
Assess energy expenditure thanks to indirect calorimetry6 monthsThe energy expenditure will be estimated thanks to: \- Resting metabolic rate

Countries

France

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRPaul Perez, Dr

University Hospital, Bordeaux

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBlandine Gatta-Cherifi, Pr

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026