Skip to content

High Dose Flu Vaccine in Treating Children Who Have Undergone Donor Stem Cell Transplant

Comparison of High vs. Standard Dose Flu Vaccine in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02860039
Enrollment
170
Registered
2016-08-09
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipient, Influenza, Malignant Neoplasm

Brief summary

This phase II randomized trial studies how well high dose flu vaccine works in treating children who have undergone done stem cell transplant. Higher dose flu vaccine may build a better immune response and may provide better protection against the flu than the standard vaccine.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) compared with standard dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will increase the probability of achieving a \>= 4-fold rise in hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers, \>= 1:40 HAI titer, or higher geometric mean titer (GMT) to influenza A antigens in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether HD-TIV compared with standard dose QIV will increase the probability of achieving a \>= 4-fold rise in HAI titers, \>= 1:40 HAI titer, or higher GMT titers to influenza B antigens in pediatric HSCT recipients. II. To determine the frequency and severity of solicited local injection site adverse events (e.g. pain/ tenderness, redness, and swelling at injection site) with HD-TIV compared to standard QIV in pediatric HSCT recipients. III. To determine the frequency and severity of solicited systemic adverse events (e.g. fevers, headache, fatigue/malaise, nausea, body ache/myalgia, general activity level, and vomiting) with HD-TIV compared to standard dose QIV in pediatric HSCT recipients. IV. To define the relationship between HAI titers, in vivo T and B cell phenotype, and in vitro influenza-specific T and B cell response in pediatric HSCT recipients receiving either HD-TIV or standard dose QIV. V. To correlate HAI responses to microneutralization responses. VI. To compare the persistent HAI and microneutralization (MN) titers for all four antigen seven months after the last vaccine dose to assess for persistence of antibody titers. VII. To compare influenza detection by PCR during influenza season in pediatric HSCT recipients receiving either HD-TIV or standard dose QIV. VIII. To assess HAI and MN response in children vaccinated during year 1 and revaccinated during year 2 using the same antigen dose. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. GROUP I (Experimental): Patients receive HD-TIV intramuscularly (IM) on day 0 and day 28. GROUP II (Standard): Patients receive standard dose QIV IM on day 0 and day 28. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 28-42 days, and at 7 months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTrivalent Influenza Vaccine

High dose Trivalent Influenza Vaccine given intramuscular

Standard dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine given intramuscular

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Inclusion criteria 1. Allogeneic HSCT recipients who are 3-35 months post-transplant; 2. 3-17 years of age, inclusive; 3. Available for duration of study; 4. Patients with stable GVHD for at least 4 weeks will be eligible (stable is defined as having no major increases in systemic immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD; adjustments of established medications to obtain a stable target level are acceptable and do not impact eligibility). Parent/legal guardian willing and capable of signing written informed consent; 5. Parent/legal guardian expected to be available for entire study; 6. Parent/legal guardian can be reached by telephone and/or electronic communication. 7. Subjects must have a platelet count of ≥30,000 to receive the immunizations. Patients requiring platelet transfusions are eligible to enroll and must have a platelet count ≥30,000 within 72 hours prior to their immunization, or platelet count ≥75,000 without transfusion documented within 30 days for subjects \<12 months post-transplant and within 90 days for subjects 12-35 months post-transplant. 2.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of hypersensitivity to previous influenza vaccination or severe hypersensitivity to eggs/egg protein; 2. History of Guillain-Barre syndrome; 3. Evidence of hematologic malignancy or disease relapse post-transplant (stable mixed chimerism is permitted); 4. History of receiving current year seasonal influenza vaccine post-transplant; 5. Pregnant female; 6. History of proven influenza disease after September 1, 2018 prior to enrollment 7. Non-allogeneic (e.g. autologous) or syngeneic hematopoietic SCT recipients; 8. History of known active infection with HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C; 9. History of known severe latex hypersensitivity; 10. Subjects who have received stem cell boost or delayed donor lymphocyte infusion within 90 days prior to enrollment, including day of enrollment; 11. Receipt of IVIG/SCIG \<27 days prior to calendar day of vaccination; 12. Subjects who have participated in year 1 and/or 2 of the study, and received study vaccine Criteria for temporarily delaying vaccine administration: The following conditions are temporary or self-limiting, and a subject may be included in the study once the condition has resolved, provided that the subject is otherwise eligible: 1). Fever ≥100.4ºF/38.0ºC (oral measurement), or an acute illness within 48 hours of enrollment 2). Receipt of any live vaccines within four weeks or any inactivated vaccines within two weeks prior to potential study vaccination. Note: if patients were eligible for vaccine 1, they will be eligible to receive vaccine 2 regardless of any changes on their GVHD status, unless it is deemed not medically safe to receive influenza vaccine. For subjects who were enrolled and vaccinated in 2016-17, 2017-18, or 2018-19, the goal is to enroll individuals who participated in the previous influenza season year and administer the same vaccination as the previous year. These subjects are referred to as repeaters. For example, subjects enrolled in 2016-17 could re-enroll in 2017-18, subjects enrolled in 2017-18 could re-enroll in 2018-19, and subjects in 2018-19 are deemed eligible to re-enroll in 2019-20 as repeaters. Subjects may only enroll as a repeater one time and must enroll the year after their original enrollment. Subjects must receive at least one vaccine to be eligible as a repeater in the subsequent year. Enrollment Criteria for Subjects who Participated in the previous influenza season * Repeaters will retain their original study ID and their randomization number * Previous screen failures will not be enrolled. * If visit 4 from the previous influenza season and visit 1 from the current influenza season year occur on the same day, lab results from visit 4 (prior to consent) can be part of visit 1. 1. Inclusion criteria 1. Available for duration of study; 2. Patients with stable GVHD for at least 4 weeks will be eligible (stable is defined as no major change in systemic immunosuppressive therapy for worsening GVHD; adjustment of actual dose to obtain a stable target level is acceptable). 3. Subjects must have a platelet count of ≥30,000 to receive the immunizations. Patients requiring platelet transfusions are eligible to enroll and must have a platelet count ≥30,000 within 72 hours prior to their immunization, or platelet count ≥75,000 without transfusion documented within 30 days for subjects \<12 months post-transplant and within 90 days for subjects 12-35 months post-transplant. 4. Parent/legal guardian willing and capable of signing written informed consent; 5. Parent/legal guardian expected to be available for entire study; 6. Parent/legal guardian can be reached by telephone and/or electronic communication. 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersVisit 1 (baseline) was day 0; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals for proportion of subjects achieving seroconversion (4-fold or greater rise in HAI titers from visit 1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsUp to 7 days following each vaccination: up to day 7 for vaccine 1 and up to day 35-49 for vaccine 2The proportion of subjects in each group experiencing at least one solicited AE with 95% posterior credible intervals, separated by vaccine number and adverse event type. AEs were assessed by clinicians using Tables 4 and 5 within section C16 of the protocol. Solicited injection site AEs included: pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and swelling/induration. The diameter of any erythema/redness and swelling/induration was measured to evaluate redness size and swelling size. Solicited systemic AEs included: fevers, fatigue/malaise, headache, nausea, body ache/myalgia, generally activity, and vomiting.
T and B Cell Phenotype Assessed by Mass CytometryVisit 1 (baseline) was day 0; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.T and B cell response was assessed at visit 1,visit 2, visit 3, and visit 4. Results are incomplete due to pending grant funding for laboratory testing. This outcome will be updated once the funding has been obtained and results are available.
T and B Cell Response Assessed by Mass Cytometry and In-vitro Functionality AssaysVisit 1 (baseline) was day 0; optional visit 1 was 5-10 days after visit 1; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; optional visit 2 was 5-10 days after visit 2; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.T and B cell response was assessed at visit 1, an optional visit 5-10 days after visit 1, visit 2, an optional visit 5-10 days after visit 2, visit 3, and visit 4. Results are pending due to pending grant funding for laboratory testing. This outcome will be updated once the funding has been obtained and results are available.
Percentage of Individuals in Each Group Who Test Positive for InfluenzaDuring the influenza season, up to 6 monthsThe percentage of breakthrough flu in vaccinated participants, separated by treatment group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 200 children were targeted with the expectation of a 20% drop out rate, as described in Section C17 in the protocol. We were able to enroll 170 subjects with an 8% dropout rate between Visit 1 and Visit 4.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 - High Dose TIV
Patients receive HD-TIV intramuscularly (IM) on day 0 and day 28. Trivalent Influenza Vaccine: High dose Trivalent Influenza Vaccine given intramuscular Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
85
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIV
Patients receive standard dose QIV IM on day 0 and day 28. Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine: Standard dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine given intramuscular Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
85
Total170

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath40
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyNot otherwise eligible11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 - High Dose TIVGroup 2 - Standard Dose QIVTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
85 Participants85 Participants170 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous11.7811 years10.6476 years10.8694 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants17 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants68 Participants134 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants12 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants62 Participants117 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
85 participants85 participants170 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants36 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants49 Participants94 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 850 / 85
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 852 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 859 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Immunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI Titers

Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals for proportion of subjects achieving seroconversion (4-fold or greater rise in HAI titers from visit 1).

Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline) was day 0; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.

Population: The number analyzed for each row represents the number of participants that completed the indicated visit and had a recorded HAI titer for the indicated antigen and visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 20.20 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 30.42 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 40.31 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 20.22 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 30.41 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 40.36 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 20.24 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 30.46 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 40.34 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 20.12 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 30.20 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 40.19 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 30.41 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 20.20 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 20.23 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 30.31 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 20.25 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H1N1 Visit 40.29 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 30.46 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 20.14 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Yamagata Visit 40.42 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 30.31 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersB/Victoria Visit 40.38 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVImmunogenicity as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Achieve a 4-fold (or Greater) Rise in Post-vaccination HAI TitersA/H3N2 Visit 40.35 proportion of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Individuals in Each Group Who Test Positive for Influenza

The percentage of breakthrough flu in vaccinated participants, separated by treatment group.

Time frame: During the influenza season, up to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 - High Dose TIVPercentage of Individuals in Each Group Who Test Positive for Influenza11 Participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVPercentage of Individuals in Each Group Who Test Positive for Influenza13 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events

The proportion of subjects in each group experiencing at least one solicited AE with 95% posterior credible intervals, separated by vaccine number and adverse event type. AEs were assessed by clinicians using Tables 4 and 5 within section C16 of the protocol. Solicited injection site AEs included: pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and swelling/induration. The diameter of any erythema/redness and swelling/induration was measured to evaluate redness size and swelling size. Solicited systemic AEs included: fevers, fatigue/malaise, headache, nausea, body ache/myalgia, generally activity, and vomiting.

Time frame: Up to 7 days following each vaccination: up to day 7 for vaccine 1 and up to day 35-49 for vaccine 2

Population: The number of subjects analyzed for Vaccine 1 represents the number of subjects who attended Visit 1 and received the first vaccine. The number of subjects analyzed for Vaccine 2 represents the number of subjects who attended Visit 2 and received the second vaccine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Swelling0.167 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Pain0.341 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Headache0.165 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Tenderness0.435 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Pain0.345 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Redness size0.035 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Nausea0.129 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Swelling0.106 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Swelling size0.047 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Fever0.024 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Fever0.071 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Myalgia0.188 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Fatigue0.179 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Swelling size0.060 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Headache0.143 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - General activity0.129 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Nausea0.131 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Vomiting0.048 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Myalgia0.060 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Fatigue0.188 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - General activity0.107 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Vomiting0.071 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Tenderness0.429 proportion of participants
Group 1 - High Dose TIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Redness size0.083 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Nausea0.133 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Vomiting0.048 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Pain0.253 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Tenderness0.265 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Redness size0.048 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Swelling0.072 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Swelling size0.048 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Swelling0.082 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Fever0.012 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Fatigue0.235 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Headache0.153 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Nausea0.141 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Myalgia0.153 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - General activity0.188 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Vomiting0.071 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Pain0.341 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Tenderness0.424 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Redness size0.035 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 1 - Swelling size0.024 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Fever0.072 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Fatigue0.1181 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Headache0.157 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - Myalgia0.157 proportion of participants
Group 2 - Standard Dose QIVProportion of Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse EventsVaccine 2 - General activity0.169 proportion of participants
Secondary

T and B Cell Phenotype Assessed by Mass Cytometry

T and B cell response was assessed at visit 1,visit 2, visit 3, and visit 4. Results are incomplete due to pending grant funding for laboratory testing. This outcome will be updated once the funding has been obtained and results are available.

Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline) was day 0; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.

Secondary

T and B Cell Response Assessed by Mass Cytometry and In-vitro Functionality Assays

T and B cell response was assessed at visit 1, an optional visit 5-10 days after visit 1, visit 2, an optional visit 5-10 days after visit 2, visit 3, and visit 4. Results are pending due to pending grant funding for laboratory testing. This outcome will be updated once the funding has been obtained and results are available.

Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline) was day 0; optional visit 1 was 5-10 days after visit 1; visit 2 was 28-42 days after visit 1; optional visit 2 was 5-10 days after visit 2; visit 3 was 28-42 days after visit 2; and visit 4 was 138-222 days after visit 2.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026