Skip to content

Comparison of Response and Recurrence Rates Following Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy Versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Response and Recurrence Rates Following Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy (MCT) Versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02859753
Acronym
Thermoablation
Enrollment
35
Registered
2016-08-09
Start date
2014-01-15
Completion date
2020-03-18
Last updated
2024-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Liver Disease, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Thermoablation

Brief summary

To date, the majority of studies that have evaluated the efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions in cirrhotic patients and compared its efficacy with that of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local recurrence and survival have been retrospective. There have been no prospective randomized studies comparing percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) with RFA for ablated tumour volume, the response after one session, local recurrence rates in the first year, complication rates and survival at 3 and 5 years for HCC lesions \> 2 cm in patients with Child-Pugh A and B cirrhosis. The hypothesis the investigators wish to explore is that though the 2 methods are equivalent for lesions ≤ 2 cm, MWA could show better efficacy with a similar risk for lesions \> 2 cm and for lesions close to vessels ≥ 3 mm in diameter, as shown in retrospective studies.

Interventions

OTHERPercutaneous Microwave Ablation

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient who have been informed about the research and given their oral consent * Patients with national health insurance cover * Patients ≥ 18 years * ≤ 3 CHC lesions ≤ 4 cm, with a maximum of 3 lesions with a diagnosis of HCC based on histology, or according to European Society for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria * Chronic liver disease or cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score between 5 and 8 points * Contra-indication for surgical resection at the time of the therapeutic decision made during a multidisciplinary meeting

Exclusion criteria

* Informed consent not obtained (refusal of patient or patient lacking discernment) * Kidney failure with creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min thus preventing the injection of contrast for the initial or follow-up radiological imaging * Presence of a malignant tumour other than the HCC at the time of the diagnosis, unless a basocellular carcinoma * Cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score \> 8 * Contra-indication for percutaneous treatment according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria * Patients without national health insurance cover

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to disease progression according to American Society of Interventional Radiology criteriaThrough study completion up to 5 years

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026